Re: [C++][SDO] Use of std::string

2006-10-02 Thread Pete Robbins
So, does anyone have any objection if I check in the updates to typedef SDOString as std::string? -- Pete

Re: [C++][SDO] Use of std::string

2006-10-02 Thread Andrew Borley
Not me! On a releated note - is there any particular functionality or big fixes that would be good to get into M2 for SDO? We have a good list for SCA, but not much for SDO. Cheers Andy On 10/2/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, does anyone have any objection if I check in the

Re: [C++][SDO] Use of std::string

2006-10-02 Thread Pete Robbins
There are certainly some fixes already in SDO that are required by SCA so we will need to cut an SDO release as well. We may as wqell try to do this at the same time as SCA. We need to go through the SDO Jiras and prioritise them. Cheers, On 02/10/06, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [C++][SDO] Use of std::string

2006-10-02 Thread Geoffrey Winn
No objection from me. Geoff. On 02/10/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, does anyone have any objection if I check in the updates to typedef SDOString as std::string? -- Pete

Re: [C++][SDO] Use of std::string

2006-10-02 Thread Geoffrey Winn
I'd like to get support for stdcxx in the Linux build as it already is in the XP one. I'm planning to review the JIRA list this week to see what's urgent or blocking other people. Geoff. On 02/10/06, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not me! On a releated note - is there any particular

Re: [C++][SDO] Use of std::string

2006-10-02 Thread Pete Robbins
On 02/10/06, Geoffrey Winn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to get support for stdcxx in the Linux build as it already is in the XP one. I'm planning to review the JIRA list this week to see what's urgent or blocking other people. Thanks Geoff, that would be great! Cheers, -- Pete

RE: [C++][SDO] Use of std::string

2006-10-02 Thread Andy Grove \(Contractor\)
++][SDO] Use of std::string No objection from me. Geoff. On 02/10/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, does anyone have any objection if I check in the updates to typedef SDOString as std::string? -- Pete

[C++][SDO] Use of std::string

2006-09-29 Thread Pete Robbins
I've been playing around tidying up some of the SDO code where we have methods implemented that take parameters as char* and SDOString (See latest DataObjectImpl changes). I'd like to propose we get rid of SDOString and just use std::string. SDOString inherits from std::string but does not add

Re: [C++][SDO] Use of std::string

2006-09-29 Thread Pete Robbins
I've opened Jira 764 and have attached a patch that typedefs SDOString to std::string Cheers, On 29/09/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been playing around tidying up some of the SDO code where we have methods implemented that take parameters as char* and SDOString (See latest

Re: [C++][SDO] Use of std::string

2006-09-29 Thread Pete Robbins
On 29/09/06, Geoffrey Winn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 29/09/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to propose we get rid of SDOString and just use std::string. SDOString inherits from std::string but does not add any additional function. The initial idea of having SDOString