So, does anyone have any objection if I check in the updates to typedef
SDOString as std::string?
--
Pete
Not me! On a releated note - is there any particular functionality or
big fixes that would be good to get into M2 for SDO? We have a good
list for SCA, but not much for SDO.
Cheers
Andy
On 10/2/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, does anyone have any objection if I check in the
There are certainly some fixes already in SDO that are required by SCA so we
will need to cut an SDO release as well. We may as wqell try to do this at
the same time as SCA. We need to go through the SDO Jiras and prioritise
them.
Cheers,
On 02/10/06, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No objection from me.
Geoff.
On 02/10/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, does anyone have any objection if I check in the updates to typedef
SDOString as std::string?
--
Pete
I'd like to get support for stdcxx in the Linux build as it already is in
the XP one.
I'm planning to review the JIRA list this week to see what's urgent or
blocking other people.
Geoff.
On 02/10/06, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not me! On a releated note - is there any particular
On 02/10/06, Geoffrey Winn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to get support for stdcxx in the Linux build as it already is in
the XP one.
I'm planning to review the JIRA list this week to see what's urgent or
blocking other people.
Thanks Geoff, that would be great!
Cheers,
--
Pete
++][SDO] Use of std::string
No objection from me.
Geoff.
On 02/10/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, does anyone have any objection if I check in the updates to
typedef
SDOString as std::string?
--
Pete
I've been playing around tidying up some of the SDO code where we have
methods implemented that take parameters as char* and SDOString (See latest
DataObjectImpl changes).
I'd like to propose we get rid of SDOString and just use std::string.
SDOString inherits from std::string but does not add
I've opened Jira 764 and have attached a patch that typedefs SDOString to
std::string
Cheers,
On 29/09/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been playing around tidying up some of the SDO code where we have
methods implemented that take parameters as char* and SDOString (See latest
On 29/09/06, Geoffrey Winn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29/09/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to propose we get rid of SDOString and just use std::string.
SDOString inherits from std::string but does not add any additional
function. The initial idea of having SDOString
10 matches
Mail list logo