Pete Robbins wrote:
I prefer the SCA style rather than the ones in SDO. The full path is
better
as well so
#ifndef commonj_sdo_changeddataobjectlist_h
is what I would use.
However, I don't think this affects the readabillity of the code so I
don't
propose we change them all. We need to update
I prefer the SCA style rather than the ones in SDO. The full path is better
as well so
#ifndef commonj_sdo_changeddataobjectlist_h
is what I would use.
However, I don't think this affects the readabillity of the code so I don't
propose we change them all. We need to update the licence header in e
Can you please update C++ development website to include conventions that
are agreed to?
On 8/23/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I see two different coding conventions for the usual
#ifndef/#define/#endif in our include files:
#ifndef tuscany_sca_model_binding_h in tuscany
I see two different coding conventions for the usual
#ifndef/#define/#endif in our include files:
#ifndef tuscany_sca_model_binding_h in tuscany::sca::model::Binding.h
#ifndef _CHANGEDDATAOBJECTLIST_H_ in commonj::sdo::ChangedDataObjectList.h
Can we decide on a common convention? I have used bot
