I think allowing changes to PK columns would be a mistake.
Brent Daniel wrote:
Amita,
I think we intended to not allow any updates to the primary key
field. If we do want to allow this, I would suggest that the fix is to
have the UpdateGenerator use the old value of the PK field for the
where
Amita,
I think we intended to not allow any updates to the primary key
field. If we do want to allow this, I would suggest that the fix is to
have the UpdateGenerator use the old value of the PK field for the
where clause rather than the current value. That way you would get
something like "upda
Hi All,
In addition to the problem mentioned in below link,
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg16304.html
Found one more issue when tried to have a PK on the same table
OrderDetails{ORDER_ID, PRODUCT_ID, PRICE} , PK - ORDER_ID
And update is attempted to update ORDER_ID to
