I have opened Tuscany-1241 to provide the changes my team has made to the
CTS. As is mentioned in the Jira, the patch is not entirely complete in and
of itself and further may not reflect some of the changes that have gone in
recently. However, I'm aware that changes are being made to the CTS an
I added a few comments in-line.
Thanks,
Frank.
"kelvin goodson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/02/2007 06:38:28
AM:
> I'm inclined to agree that a blanket approach to this kind of testing is
not
> best. The more directed the tests are the better we can understand how
> comprehensive the CTS
I'm inclined to agree that a blanket approach to this kind of testing is not
best. The more directed the tests are the better we can understand how
comprehensive the CTS is.
However, it's not clear to me whether we can now confirm the types are as
they should be through the metadata API alone, o
I think this approach sounds a little too brute force. Regardless of how
the metadata is defined, once instances are created in memory, they will
be exactly the same. Verifying this by repeating every possible test on
the exact same DataObjects, just created differently, sounds a little
ineffic
I agree that the tests should be structured in a way that is spec and
functionaly orientated. I have never really liked the split between
paramatized and non paramatized tests so getting rid of this is just
fine.
Other than that I think that the test cases are more or less organized
by API thoug
Having spent some time getting to grips with the CTS there are some things I
think I'd like to improve.
First amongst them is to get some structure that allows us to get a feel for
how well the spec is covered by the tests. One thing that concerns me is
that one of the most apparent things in th
