Hi,
Please review and vote on the 1.0.1-incubating release artifacts of Tuscany SCA
for Java.
The RC3 contains a few fixes to issues discovered in RC2 (build.xml for web
apps, distributed calculator and excesssive jars). Thank you for reporting and
fixing the issues promptly.
SVN Tag:
http:
On 11/1/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Please review and vote on the 1.0.1-incubating release artifacts of
> Tuscany SCA for Java.
>
> The RC3 contains a few fixes to issues discovered in RC2 (build.xml for
> web apps, distributed calculator and excesssive jars). Thank you
On 11/1/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 11/1/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Please review and vote on the 1.0.1-incubating release artifacts of
> > Tuscany SCA for Java.
> >
> > The RC3 contains a few fixes to issues discovered in RC2 (build.xml for
Hi,
Thanks for pulling this thro.
I've run thro all the samples and seems like we still have some work to do
with the build.xml files.
- Distributed Calculator : none of the consoles other than the DomainNode
one.
- sample-helloworld-dojo-webapp and helloworld-jsonrpc-webapp refer to
SNAPSHOT ve
While looking through the latest RC I started looking at the LICENSE/NOTICE.
I find it very difficult to do this as it feels like there is missing
information. Some people seem to be able to home in on issues with uncanny
speed and I would like to know how they are doing it. Does someone have a
ma
Hi,
I am not an expert with this. But what I do is list all the jars we are
distributing and ensure that we are including each one of them in the
LICENSE and Notice files. Rather crude isn't it ;-). I did raise the issue
of specific version numbers being left out in the License files for the ja
From: "Venkata Krishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 4:52 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 2nd try: Release Tuscany SCA Java 1.0.1-incubating (RC3)
Hi,
Thanks for pulling this thro.
I've run thro all the samples and seems like we still have some work
ssues and looking into how to sign maven
> artifacts.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Venkata Krishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 4:52 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 2nd try: Release Tuscany SCA Jav
g the issues found in RC3, was: Re: [VOTE] 2nd try:
Release Tuscany SCA Java 1.0.1-incubating (RC3)
On 11/1/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Most likely we have to respin a new RC with all the issues reported so
far.
Would you please volunteer and let others know what yo
eported so
> >> far.
> >> Would you please volunteer and let others know what you're workin on?
> >>
> >> I'm fixing the LICENSE/NOTICE issues and looking into how to sign maven
> >> artifacts.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Ra
0% mature yet, so I'm OK
> removing it and just leaving in trunk.
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Raymond
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To:
> > Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 9:57 AM
> >
ta Krishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 4:52 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 2nd try: Release Tuscany SCA Java 1.0.1-incubating(RC3)
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for pulling this thro.
> >
> > I've run thro all t
gt; > > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To:
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 9:57 AM
> > > Subject: Re: Fixing the issues found in RC3, was: Re: [VOTE] 2nd try:
> > > R
remental changes
> > > on 1.0.1 and looks like these are not 100% mature yet, so I'm OK
> > > removing it and just leaving in trunk.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Raymond
> > > >
> > > > ---
nges
> > > > on 1.0.1 and looks like these are not 100% mature yet, so I'm OK
> > > > removing it and just leaving in trunk.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Raymond
> > > > >
> > >
> > From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To:
> > Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 9:57 AM
> > Subject: Re: Fixing the issues found in RC3, was: Re: [VOTE] 2nd try:
> > Release Tuscany SCA Java 1.0.1-incubating (RC3)
> >
> >
> &g
; > > removing it and just leaving in trunk.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Raymond
> > > > >
> > > > > - Original Message -
> > > > > From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAI
?
> > > > >
> > > > > +1... My thought is that we should only have safe incremental
> > changes
> > > > > on 1.0.1 and looks like these are not 100% mature yet, so I'm OK
> > > > > removing it and just leaving in trunk.
> > > > >
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
