[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-767?page=comments#action_12439768
]
Jim Marino commented on TUSCANY-767:
I've applied the patch for kernel with some additional test cases. I think
there are execution paths that are not
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-767?page=comments#action_12439312
]
Jim Marino commented on TUSCANY-767:
Ignacio was going to add some testcases to verify behavior and I'll apply.
NPE in CompositeReference.java when service
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 4:48 PM
Subject: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-767) NPE in CompositeReference.java when
service is defined using interface wsdl
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-767?page=comments#action_12439312 ]
Jim Marino commented
On Oct 2, 2006, at 4:26 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Oct 2, 2006, at 3:49 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Ah, if only test cases were that simple ... :-)
If it isn't simple to unit test that generally indicates we have a
broader problem - e.g. lack of separation of concerns.
As it turns out,
that does not rely on java
reflection.
Thoughts?
- Original Message -
From: Raymond Feng (JIRA) tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 6:25 PM
Subject: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-767) NPE in CompositeReference.java when
service is defined using
On Sep 30, 2006, at 6:10 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Ok, I took a look. Fixing CompositeReference to not be interface/
method centric is not a big deal. However
CompositeReferenceTargetInvoker and
CompositeReferenceCallbackTargetInvoker are defined in terms of
PojoTargetInvoker which
@ws.apache.org
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 6:25 PM
Subject: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-767) NPE in
CompositeReference.java when service is defined using interface wsdl
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-767?
page=comments#action_12438820
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-767) NPE in CompositeReference.java
when service is defined using interface wsdl
On Sep 30, 2006, at 6:10 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Ok, I took a look. Fixing CompositeReference to not be interface/ method
centric is not a big deal. However
On Sep 30, 2006, at 9:55 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Ok, yes, let me take that back. Can I claim lack of caffeine? ...
Sure I do it all the time ;-)
A CompositeReferenceTargetInvoker, and certainly a bound reference
target invoker (e.g., Axis2TargetInvoker) needs to be able to
handle
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-767?page=comments#action_12438820
]
Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-767:
--
Ignacio, it seems that the CompositeReference code was initially contributed by
you, can you take a look? I found
Ok, I'll take a look.
- Original Message -
From: Raymond Feng (JIRA) tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 6:25 PM
Subject: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-767) NPE in CompositeReference.java when
service is defined using interface wsdl
11 matches
Mail list logo