Brian,
There is already spec discussion about possibly deprecating the DataGraph
interface entirely. Even if that doesn't happen, I think that the (URI,
name) methods should be deprecated.
Frank.
"Brian Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/20/2007 10:28:29
AM:
> Thanks Kelvin.
>
> That i
Thanks Kelvin.
That is a workaround for the example I provided. However, the absence of
HelperContext as a parm does seem to render createRootObject(URI, Name) and
DataGraph.getType(URI, name) of very limited use.
The DataGraph methods are different from the following:
DataObject.createDataObje
Brian,
this would be an issue for the SDO spec, but I don't think it's
necessary, since you can use
Type type =helperContext1.getTypeHelper().getType(uri, name);
and then use
dataGraph.createRootObject(type);
the root object will then provide the type scope context for subsequent
updates to th
Has there already been discussion about adding a HelperContext parm for
methods which take URI and name as input?
It seems necessary to me. For example, if you've created a Type with
helperContext1.getXSDHelper().define() or
helperContext1.getTypeHelper().define(),
then DataGraph.createRootObjec
