Re: Avoiding extension and application scdl collisions

2006-09-01 Thread Raymond Feng
to fully leverage OSGi to deal with bundle isolations and dependencies? Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 11:37 AM Subject: Re: Avoiding extension and application scdl collisions On Aug 25

Re: Avoiding extension and application scdl collisions

2006-09-01 Thread Jeremy Boynes
On Sep 1, 2006, at 9:22 AM, Raymond Feng wrote: Hi, Where do we stand for this topic? Here are some questions to be confirmed: 1) Should we allow system/extension/application code on the same classpath even it's not the best pratice? If not, should we get rid of the SCATestCase? People

Re: Avoiding extension and application scdl collisions

2006-09-01 Thread Rick
? Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 11:37 AM Subject: Re: Avoiding extension and application scdl collisions On Aug 25, 2006, at 10:56 AM, Raymond Feng wrote: Please see more comments below

Fwd: Avoiding extension and application scdl collisions

2006-09-01 Thread Jim Marino
This hasn't shown up on this list...sending again Begin forwarded message: From: Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: September 1, 2006 10:16:06 AM PDT To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: Avoiding extension and application scdl collisions On Sep 1, 2006, at 9:22 AM, Raymond Feng wrote

Re: Avoiding extension and application scdl collisions

2006-09-01 Thread Raymond Feng
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 2:26 PM Subject: Fwd: Avoiding extension and application scdl collisions This hasn't shown up on this list...sending again Begin forwarded message: From: Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: September 1, 2006 10:16:06 AM PDT To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject

Re: Avoiding extension and application scdl collisions

2006-08-29 Thread ant elder
I don't think its promoting SCA as the successor to WSIF. Although different there is functional overlap and this is just using that to get some new people to notice Tuscany. ...ant On 8/26/06, Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Aug 26, 2006, at 3:33 AM, ant elder wrote: On 8/25/06,

Re: Avoiding extension and application scdl collisions

2006-08-26 Thread ant elder
On 8/25/06, Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip/ More importantly, if we are trying to make the use case of a single reference used by a J2SE client easier, I'd would say don't use SCA for that. Just use Axis (or some other transport) directly. Where SCA is valuable is in assembly

Re: Avoiding extension and application scdl collisions

2006-08-26 Thread Jim Marino
On Aug 26, 2006, at 3:33 AM, ant elder wrote: On 8/25/06, Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip/ More importantly, if we are trying to make the use case of a single reference used by a J2SE client easier, I'd would say don't use SCA for that. Just use Axis (or some other transport)

Re: Avoiding extension and application scdl collisions

2006-08-25 Thread cr22rc
and application scdl collisions I kind of have and closer idea why interop unit testcases fail when run from the maven command line. It appears the forking for some reason I'm still not 100% sure of puts the Axis2Binding jar in the same classloader as the application scdl. It could be the fork

Re: Avoiding extension and application scdl collisions

2006-08-25 Thread Jim Marino
/tuscany/extension.composite application: META-INF/sca/application.composite Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscdev tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 9:26 AM Subject: Avoiding extension and application scdl collisions I kind

Re: Avoiding extension and application scdl collisions

2006-08-25 Thread Jim Marino
PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 8:59 AM Subject: Re: Avoiding extension and application scdl collisions On Aug 24, 2006, at 10:50 PM, Raymond Feng wrote: Hi, I understand we endeavor to support isolated classloading for system, extension, and application

Re: Avoiding extension and application scdl collisions

2006-08-25 Thread Raymond Feng
Please see more comments below. Raymond - Original Message - From: Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 10:27 AM Subject: Re: Avoiding extension and application scdl collisions On Aug 25, 2006, at 9:32 AM, Raymond Feng wrote

Re: Avoiding extension and application scdl collisions

2006-08-25 Thread cr22rc
PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 10:27 AM Subject: Re: Avoiding extension and application scdl collisions On Aug 25, 2006, at 9:32 AM, Raymond Feng wrote: Hi, It's a bit challenging to run a simple SCA J2SE helloworld sample. Here's the folder structure you

Re: Avoiding extension and application scdl collisions

2006-08-25 Thread Jim Marino
On Aug 25, 2006, at 10:56 AM, Raymond Feng wrote: Please see more comments below. Raymond - Original Message - From: Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 10:27 AM Subject: Re: Avoiding extension and application scdl collisions

Re: Avoiding extension and application scdl collisions

2006-08-24 Thread Raymond Feng
] To: tuscdev tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 9:26 AM Subject: Avoiding extension and application scdl collisions I kind of have and closer idea why interop unit testcases fail when run from the maven command line. It appears the forking for some reason I'm still not 100