On 9/25/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/25/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
Hi
It feels like we have been getting better at using JIRA in the run up
to
0.99 and 1.0 release in terms of the consistency with which we raise
On 9/26/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/25/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/25/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
Hi
It feels like we have been getting better at using JIRA in the run
up
to
0.99 and
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
Hi
It feels like we have been getting better at using JIRA in the run up to
0.99 and 1.0 release in terms of the consistency with which we raise bug
reports and assign them to releases. Based on Ant's branch freeze suggestion
how about we now
1/ create the following
[snip]
ant elder wrote:
Just a reminder there is still a change freeze on the 1.0 branch.
Its still possible we may need to respin for some reason, but how about also
planning on doing some 1.0.x releases after 1.0 is out? If we keep changes
in the branch to an absolute minimum it should
On 9/25/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
Hi
It feels like we have been getting better at using JIRA in the run up to
0.99 and 1.0 release in terms of the consistency with which we raise bug
reports and assign them to releases. Based on Ant's
Just a reminder there is still a change freeze on the 1.0 branch.
Its still possible we may need to respin for some reason, but how about also
planning on doing some 1.0.x releases after 1.0 is out? If we keep changes
in the branch to an absolute minimum it should be easy to do 1.0.x releases
On 9/20/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a reminder there is still a change freeze on the 1.0 branch.
Its still possible we may need to respin for some reason, but how about
also
planning on doing some 1.0.x releases after 1.0 is out? If we keep changes
in the branch
+1... makes lot of sense to me
- Venkat
On 9/20/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a reminder there is still a change freeze on the 1.0 branch.
Its still possible we may need to respin for some reason, but how about
also
planning on doing some 1.0.x releases after 1.0 is out
-- Forwarded message --
From: Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sep 20, 2007 8:16 AM
Subject: Re: Change freeze on 1.0 branch
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1... makes lot of sense to me
- Venkat
On 9/20/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just
On 9/20/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sep 20, 2007 8:16 AM
Subject: Re: Change freeze on 1.0 branch
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1... makes lot of sense to me
- Venkat
in the reviews of RC3a?
Simon
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
+1... makes lot of sense to me
- Venkat
On 9/20/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a reminder there is still a change freeze on the 1.0 branch.
Its still possible we may need to respin for some reason, but how about
also
planning
:
Just a reminder there is still a change freeze on the 1.0 branch.
Its still possible we may need to respin for some reason, but how about
also
planning on doing some 1.0.x releases after 1.0 is out? If we keep
changes
in the branch to an absolute minimum it should be easy to do
1.0
ant elder wrote:
On 9/20/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sep 20, 2007 8:16 AM
Subject: Re: Change freeze on 1.0 branch
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1... makes lot of sense
+1 on Simon's proposal.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 12:43 AM
Subject: [DISCUSS] JIRA - was:Fwd: Change freeze on 1.0 branch
-- Forwarded message
on 1.0 branch
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1... makes lot of sense to me
- Venkat
On 9/20/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a reminder there is still a change freeze on the 1.0 branch.
Its still possible we may need to respin for some reason, but how about
PROTECTED]
Date: Sep 20, 2007 8:16 AM
Subject: Re: Change freeze on 1.0 branch
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1... makes lot of sense to me
- Venkat
On 9/20/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a reminder there is still a change freeze on the 1.0 branch
Looks like 1.0 is getting pretty close now so can we have a change freeze on
the 1.0 branch to avoid any last minute regressions please - no updates to
it without asking first.
We need an RC4 to fix the missing xquery sample and the ws.zones repo, but
i'd hope RC4 can be the final one. Please
, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like 1.0 is getting pretty close now so can we have a change freeze on
the 1.0 branch to avoid any last minute regressions please - no updates to
it without asking first.
We need an RC4 to fix the missing xquery sample and the ws.zones repo, but
i'd
18 matches
Mail list logo
