Re: Conversational - spec question

2007-07-22 Thread scabooz
Hi guys, See below Dave - Original Message - From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 1:59 PM Subject: Re: Conversational - spec question Simon Laws wrote: On 7/20/07, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Folks

Re: Conversational - spec question

2007-07-22 Thread scabooz
: Conversational - spec question Sorry for the delay in responding. I have been very preoccupied with debugging the new Web Service callback implementation. I believe there is good news on this - see below. Simon ant elder wrote: On 7/21/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ant elder

Re: Conversational - spec question

2007-07-22 Thread Simon Nash
See inline. Simon scabooz wrote: Hi guys, See below Dave - Original Message - From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 1:59 PM Subject: Re: Conversational - spec question Simon Laws wrote: On 7/20/07, Mike

Re: Conversational - spec question

2007-07-22 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[snip] scabooz wrote: Composite scoped components can have concurrent requests inflight, the runtime does not need to serialize for concurrency. I recall having this conversation during the spec work, but cant find verbiage in the specs. FWIW, I recall that for composite scoped components, we

Re: Conversational - spec question

2007-07-21 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
ant elder wrote: On 7/21/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ant elder wrote: On 7/20/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip - I have to deal with concurrent requests in my business logic, but then I'm having a hard time understanding how my business

Re: Conversational - spec question

2007-07-21 Thread ant elder
On 7/21/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ant elder wrote: On 7/21/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ant elder wrote: On 7/20/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip - I have to deal with concurrent requests in my business logic,

Re: Conversational - spec question

2007-07-21 Thread Simon Nash
Sorry for the delay in responding. I have been very preoccupied with debugging the new Web Service callback implementation. I believe there is good news on this - see below. Simon ant elder wrote: On 7/21/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ant elder wrote: On 7/21/07,

Re: Conversational - spec question

2007-07-20 Thread Simon Laws
On 7/20/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/19/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone familiar with the conversation aspects of the spec tell me what is the specified way to get a conversationId in a stateless service, i.ea service which implements an @Conversational

Re: Conversational - spec question

2007-07-20 Thread ant elder
On 7/19/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone familiar with the conversation aspects of the spec tell me what is the specified way to get a conversationId in a stateless service, i.e a service which implements an @Conversational interface but is not annotated with

Re: Conversational - spec question

2007-07-20 Thread Mike Edwards
Folks, It is clear from reading other sections of the specification that it is intended that @ConversationID is used in implementation classes other than those of CONVERSATION scope. Further down in 1.2.51 of the JavaComponentImplementation spec, it says the following: 1. The

Re: Conversational - spec question

2007-07-20 Thread Simon Laws
On 7/20/07, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Folks, It is clear from reading other sections of the specification that it is intended that @ConversationID is used in implementation classes other than those of CONVERSATION scope. Further down in 1.2.51 of the JavaComponentImplementation

Re: Conversational - spec question

2007-07-20 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Simon Laws wrote: On 7/20/07, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Folks, It is clear from reading other sections of the specification that it is intended that @ConversationID is used in implementation classes other than those of CONVERSATION scope. Further down in 1.2.51 of the

Re: Conversational - spec question

2007-07-20 Thread ant elder
On 7/20/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simon Laws wrote: On 7/20/07, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Folks, It is clear from reading other sections of the specification that it is intended that @ConversationID is used in implementation classes other than those

Re: Conversational - spec question

2007-07-20 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
ant elder wrote: On 7/20/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simon Laws wrote: On 7/20/07, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Folks, It is clear from reading other sections of the specification that it is intended that @ConversationID is used in implementation

Re: Conversational - spec question

2007-07-20 Thread ant elder
On 7/20/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip - I have to deal with concurrent requests in my business logic, but then I'm having a hard time understanding how my business logic is going to handle interlaced injection calls and business method calls in a multi-threaded

Re: Conversational - spec question

2007-07-20 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
ant elder wrote: On 7/20/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip - I have to deal with concurrent requests in my business logic, but then I'm having a hard time understanding how my business logic is going to handle interlaced injection calls and business method calls in a

Re: Conversational - spec question

2007-07-20 Thread ant elder
On 7/21/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ant elder wrote: On 7/20/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip - I have to deal with concurrent requests in my business logic, but then I'm having a hard time understanding how my business logic is going to