and cardinality
Hi,
Please see my comments inline below.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 5:25 AM
Subject: Domains, runtimes, components and cardinality
Following
Hi,
I have a few comments embedded below.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: Domains, runtimes, components and cardinality
Hi,
Please see my comments inline below.
Thanks
On 6/19/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I guess it should be a good start to have SCA domains span across runtimes
and leave the runtimes being shared by SCA domains to the next iteration.
As for the second point, is there a possibility of seeing this as
replication of
Hi,
I guess it should be a good start to have SCA domains span across runtimes
and leave the runtimes being shared by SCA domains to the next iteration.
As for the second point, is there a possibility of seeing this as
replication of components across two runtimes instead of nodes? Anyways, to
Following on from recent discussion on the distributed binding (I've been
putting notes here [1])... In a Tuscany SCA runtime what do we expect the
cardinality between the various parts of it to be?
A domain notionally runs on a runtime. In the case of a stand-alone Tuscany
SCA runtime this will
Hi,
Please see my comments inline below.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 5:25 AM
Subject: Domains, runtimes, components and cardinality
Following on from recent discussion
