Hi,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts further. My comments inline.
- Venkat
On Feb 12, 2008 9:51 PM, Greg Dritschler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comments below.
On Feb 11, 2008 7:36 AM, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Greg,
Thanks for your observations / suggestions.
Comments below.
On Feb 11, 2008 7:36 AM, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Greg,
Thanks for your observations / suggestions. Please see my comments
inline.
I apologize for making them lengthy in the hope that it would trigger more
discussions.
- Venkat
On Feb 7, 2008 1:33
Hi Greg,
Thanks for your observations / suggestions. Please see my comments inline.
I apologize for making them lengthy in the hope that it would trigger more
discussions.
- Venkat
On Feb 7, 2008 1:33 AM, Greg Dritschler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been looking at the PolicyHandler
: PolicyHanders
I have been looking at the PolicyHandler support for Java implementations
and overall I like the direction this is going. I have some comments
about
it.
I think we should converge PolicyHandler into the Interceptor framework. The
current PolicyHandler interface is not well-typed
I have been looking at the PolicyHandler support for Java implementations
and overall I like the direction this is going. I have some comments about
it.
1. If a given component/operation has multiple policy sets that are handled
by the same PolicyHandler, it appears that one PolicyHandler is
