I agree with Rick's proposal that we need to get onto one codebase
for the sake of the project, and with Raymond's and Jeremy's comments
that we must work together as a community to resolve the technical
issues that have been raised on this list regarding some aspects of
the chianti design.
Movin
+1
The trunk is dead. Long live the trunk!
--
Pete
On Jul 14, 2006, at 1:20 PM, Frank Budinsky wrote:
I hate to be a party pooper and, in fact, I can say that I've been too
busy with SDO issues to look at enough of the details to feel
qualified to
vote, but the most recent note I saw from Sebastien, voicing issues
with
Jeremy and Jim's desig
Rick wrote:
Hello fellow committers,
Last week I was on vacation and felt for sure that when I got back
I'd see a unified direction for the Java Tuscany SCA code base. I've
held back discussing any of this for a while because I didn't want
to add any more fuel to the fire. I now f
I hate to be a party pooper and, in fact, I can say that I've been too
busy with SDO issues to look at enough of the details to feel qualified to
vote, but the most recent note I saw from Sebastien, voicing issues with
Jeremy and Jim's design (that is what's called Chianti now - right?), I
woul
+1
On 7/14/06, Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello fellow committers,
Last week I was on vacation and felt for sure that when I got back
I'd see a unified direction for the Java Tuscany SCA code base. I've
held back discussing any of this for a while because I didn't want
t
This chain of +1s is truly good for the spirit, so FWIW, not being a
committer, +1 from me too
On 7/14/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
...ant
On 7/14/06, Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello fellow committers,
> Last week I was on vacation and felt for sure that wh
+1
...ant
On 7/14/06, Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello fellow committers,
Last week I was on vacation and felt for sure that when I got back
I'd see a unified direction for the Java Tuscany SCA code base. I've
held back discussing any of this for a while because I didn't
+1, to both the proposal and Raymond's comments
--
Jeremy
On Jul 14, 2006, at 10:34 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Here's my non-binding vote: +1.
I fully agree that we're at a cirtical point to make the direction
clear and move forward quickly. Moving Chianti into trunk will
definitely help us
Here's my non-binding vote: +1.
I fully agree that we're at a cirtical point to make the direction clear and
move forward quickly. Moving Chianti into trunk will definitely help us set
the new common base as we don't see other appealing alternatives. I also
would like to advocate that the mov
+1 from me
Jim Marino wrote:
On Jul 14, 2006, at 9:33 AM, Rick wrote:
Hello fellow committers,
Last week I was on vacation and felt for sure that when I got back
I'd see a unified direction for the Java Tuscany SCA code base. I've
held back discussing any of this for a while bec
On Jul 14, 2006, at 9:33 AM, Rick wrote:
Hello fellow committers,
Last week I was on vacation and felt for sure that when I got back
I'd see a unified direction for the Java Tuscany SCA code base.
I've
held back discussing any of this for a while because I didn't want
to add a
Rick,
I have held back from this discussion as I am not as actively involved
with Tuscany as most of you, though I do keep a keen eye on what is
happening. There are a lot of us who are watching the evolution of SCA
with a great deal of interest and especially Tuscany, with it being the
only signi
13 matches
Mail list logo
