Re: Implementation Policies

2008-01-02 Thread Simon Nash
I took Venkat's post as expressing a need for some kind of validation that would be performed before the composite is allowed to be used by the runtime. This seems to preclude a solution based on management interfaces, as these would presumably not come into play until the composite is actually r

Re: Implementation Policies

2008-01-02 Thread Mike Edwards
Folks, Perhaps this calls for something more general which will support other use cases. How about some form of "management" interfaces which will allow an application to get information about entities inside the runtime in a controlled fashion? So the idea would be to get some contribution

Re: Implementation Policies

2007-12-23 Thread Venkata Krishnan
Hi Simon, What I need is a hook into the runtime startup and more specifically after the build phase so that I can analyse the built composite to see if it has the correctly computed intents and policysets. Is that something we can do in the node-runtime? Thanks - Venkat On Dec 23, 2007 10:5

Re: Implementation Policies

2007-12-23 Thread Simon Laws
Hi Venkat Why do you say you had to almost rewrite the host-embeded runtime to make a itest work in this scenario? Is the something we can do with the node runtime to help you out here? Simon On Dec 23, 2007 4:45 PM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I've made some additions

Re: Implementation Policies

2007-12-23 Thread Venkata Krishnan
Hi, I've made some additions to the policy annotations processing. I have posted the rules of interpretation on another thread. I've also now added the code to pick up policies specified in the componentType. Ideally I would have liked to have a testcase to verify this and it seems like I'd hav

Re: Implementation Policies

2007-12-15 Thread Venkata Krishnan
Thanks for looking up :). Yes, I don't think I have picked up policies specified for an implementation in the ComponentType. I suppose the componenType will include the ones that have been specified using annotations. I will give this a check. Thanks - Venkat On Dec 15, 2007 2:19 AM, Jean-Seb

Re: Implementation Policies

2007-12-14 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Venkata Krishnan wrote: Hi, Sorry, I should have said 'resolution phase'. Its all done in the CompositeProcessor.resolve method. Looks good. Unless I missed it, I think you're missing code to add to the component policies the policies coming from a shared implementation, for example polic

Re: Implementation Policies

2007-12-12 Thread Venkata Krishnan
Hi, Sorry, I should have said 'resolution phase'. Its all done in the CompositeProcessor.resolve method. Thanks - Venkat On Dec 13, 2007 6:06 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Venkata Krishnan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've tried another way out of this and it works... her

Re: Implementation Policies

2007-12-12 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Venkata Krishnan wrote: Hi, I've tried another way out of this and it works... here is a jist of what I've done... - During the composite loading phase itself aggregate the policies into the child elements. This makes the component free to take over the implementation policies since it has alr

Re: Implementation Policies

2007-12-10 Thread Venkata Krishnan
Hi, I have put in a few more changes to get the support for policies on operations going without the hack that I had previously introduced to the ComponentImpl.getImplementation and setImplementation. I am continuing to use OperationsConfigurator and ConfiguredOperation interfaces as am yet to co

Re: Implementation Policies

2007-12-08 Thread Venkata Krishnan
Hi, I've tried another way out of this and it works... here is a jist of what I've done... - During the composite loading phase itself aggregate the policies into the child elements. This makes the component free to take over the implementation policies since it has already given away the polici

Re: Implementation Policies

2007-12-06 Thread Venkata Krishnan
Hi, First, thanks for the help. I am not so comfortable with having inside an intent or a policyset, a pointer to an assembly model artifact. I somehow see a one way dependency that goes from the assembly model to the policy model i.e. an assembly model artifact must know the policies attached t

Re: Implementation Policies

2007-12-06 Thread Simon Laws
On Dec 5, 2007 11:04 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would it help if the Intent/PolicySet has a pointer to the its attachpoint > (i.e., where the intent/policy is declared)? > > Thanks, > Raymond > > - Original Message - > From: "Venkata Krishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To:

Re: Implementation Policies

2007-12-05 Thread Raymond Feng
Would it help if the Intent/PolicySet has a pointer to the its attachpoint (i.e., where the intent/policy is declared)? Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: "Venkata Krishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 1:40 AM Subject: Implementation Policies