From: Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Physical Component Defintion
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 20:13:10 -0800
On Feb 8, 2007, at 4:42 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Feb 8, 2007, at 3:26 PM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath
On Feb 8, 2007, at 4:42 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Feb 8, 2007, at 3:26 PM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Also, for the JavaAtomicComponent, I am planning to pass in the
instance factory into the component from the builder, so that it
can be used later when createInstance is called. I am also
uscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Physical Component Defintion
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 14:43:40 -0800
On Feb 7, 2007, at 2:49 PM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Jim,
I have been looking at the work you have been doing with
component manager and URIs and figuring out h
j
From: Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Physical Component Defintion
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 14:43:40 -0800
On Feb 7, 2007, at 2:49 PM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Jim,
I have been looking at the work yo
capsulated in
the dynamically generated byte code for the instance factory. Maybe, Jeremy
has a view on this as well.
Ta
Meeraj
From: Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Physical Component Defintion
Date: Thu,
On Feb 7, 2007, at 2:49 PM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Jim,
I have been looking at the work you have been doing with component
manager and URIs and figuring out how this would fit in with
federated deployment model I have been working on. Currently, the
master creates the physical compon
