SDO RC5a Review

2006-10-25 Thread Venkata Krishnan
Hi Kelvin, Sorry could not get to this any earlier than this here is what I did and found... 1) Extracted tuscany-sdo-api-1.0-incubator-M2-src.zip and extracted into a SDO_API dir. - License.txt has a reference to Service Component Architecture at line 233 - just bringing it up just in

Re: SDO RC5a Review

2006-10-25 Thread kelvin goodson
Venkat, the problems you are having with building are due to the fact that the machine people.apache.org is still down. These issues should be fixed when it comes up. Regards, Kelvin. On 25/10/06, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Kelvin, Sorry could not get to this any earlier

Re: SDO RC5a Review

2006-10-25 Thread Venkata Krishnan
Yes... I got that. :) Just wanted to let you know that I tried this. What's your opinion on the other things that I pointed out... did I go overboard ? :) - Venkat On 10/25/06, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Venkat, the problems you are having with building are due to the fact

Re: SDO RC5a Review

2006-10-25 Thread kelvin goodson
Sorry Venkat, I'm just looking at the other things now and will post back findings. On 25/10/06, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes... I got that. :) Just wanted to let you know that I tried this. What's your opinion on the other things that I pointed out... did I go overboard ?

Re: SDO RC5a Review

2006-10-25 Thread Rick
One thing I'd like to comment on is the source included sample too. That could be intentional not sure. However, the sample distro included a site directory that had just an apidocs directory. That seemed a little out of place to me. Venkata Krishnan wrote: Hi Kelvin, Sorry could not get

Re: SDO RC5a Review

2006-10-25 Thread kelvin goodson
Rick, yes the source distro should include the samples, since you should be able to rebuild all distros from the source distro. So the source distros give instructions on how to be able to rebuild the binary and samples distro from the source distros. The site/apidocs is not a brilliant name

Re: SDO RC5a Review

2006-10-25 Thread kelvin goodson
Hi Venkat thanks for these catches. I've looked at them all in detail, and indeed there is a small amount of redundant text in the notices file, but the licenses file contain the appropriate licenses. I plan to fix this in the trunk, and let the release stand, unless anyone demands otherwise. As