From some use cases, I feel some changes to the XMLStreamHelper API might
make usage a little bit easier or more generic.
Your input will be very much appreciated.
1. Static DataObject may not necessarily always implement DataObject
interface, *and* XMLStreamHelper could be extended to serve POJ
Yang
some comments on your points,
Re the return type loadObject, the spec says that ...
"The implementation of the static interfaces must implement the DataObject
interface, enabling all Data Objects, whether static or dynamic, to be used
with the DataObject interface."
So we could make the ap
On Aug 8, 2006, at 3:15 AM, kelvin goodson wrote:
Having an XMLStreamHelper.INSTANCE sounds reasonable, scoped to the
TypeHelper.INSTANCE singleton.
Please no. INSTANCE is a real anti-pattern and we should be looking
to remove them rather than add more.
--
Jeremy
