See section 1.10 on page 63 of the assembly model spec -
http://www.oasis-opencsa.org/sca-assembly. Page 23 describes a Composite (or
page 82 for more concisely).
Either way would work - as you suggested with the synapse.xml being one big
composite, or support multiple individual composites packa
Could someone please explain to me how the sca contributions thing
works? Is it part of the spec?
Paul
On 7/25/07, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not quite. In my suggestion if you wanted sca then the synapse.xml
> would look like:
>
> http://ws.apache.org/ns/synapse";
> >
Mike
Thoughts inline:
It certainly looks like a reasonable mapping.
Good
SCA makes no assumption about the runtime at all - and the spec teams
have always viewed the SCA model as being mappable to a whole range of
runtimes, so this way of thinking about things is fine. Indeed, some of
the
Paul,
Great to hear from you! Some thoughts inline.
Paul Fremantle wrote:
I recently read Dan's blog entry on the SCA assembly model:
http://netzooid.com/blog/2007/07/22/sca-assembly-vs-spring-cxf/
That and some other discussions I've had made me think about maybe
offering the SCA assembly mo
Not quite. In my suggestion if you wanted sca then the synapse.xml
would look like:
Maybe we should step back a bit and get more of a common understanding of
what the sca support would look like.
From that suggestion it sounds like there'd be one synapse.xml file holding
all the config (as ther
Maybe we should step back a bit and get more of a common understanding of
what the sca support would look like.
From that suggestion it sounds like there'd be one synapse.xml file holding
all the config (as there is today) and within that would be the xml using
the sca namespace to define the S
al Message -
From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: Synapse using SCA assembly model for configuration
On 7/24/07, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I recently read Dan's
On 7/24/07, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I recently read Dan's blog entry on the SCA assembly model:
http://netzooid.com/blog/2007/07/22/sca-assembly-vs-spring-cxf/
That and some other discussions I've had made me think about maybe
offering the SCA assembly model to configure Synap
I recently read Dan's blog entry on the SCA assembly model:
http://netzooid.com/blog/2007/07/22/sca-assembly-vs-spring-cxf/
That and some other discussions I've had made me think about maybe
offering the SCA assembly model to configure Synapse. So it seems to
me that you can draw a direct correla
