.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message - From: Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 7:47 AM
Subject: Re: WS-Addressing mapping (was Re: What is
Message.set/getCallableReference used for?)
Thanks for pointing out this issue. I
I'm fine with your summary.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 1:48 AM
Subject: Re: WS-Addressing mapping (was Re: What is
Message.set/getCallableReference used for?)
I don't
Comments inline.
Simon
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Comments inline.
[snip]
Simon Nash wrote:
I agree that we need a conclusion. I believe the detailed proposal below
supports all the SCA semantics and I'd like to propose that we go with it
for Tuscany 1.0.
Any comments, questions,
-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 3:43 PM
Subject: Re: WS-Addressing mapping (was Re: What is
Message.set/getCallableReference used for?)
Comments inline.
[snip]
Simon Nash wrote:
I agree that we need a conclusion. I believe
Comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 7:47 AM
Subject: Re: WS-Addressing mapping (was Re: What is
Message.set/getCallableReference used for?)
Thanks for pointing out
for the correlation.
Do you agree?
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message - From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 3:43 PM
Subject: Re: WS-Addressing mapping (was Re: What is
Message.set/getCallableReference used
Message -
From: Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2007 1:44 PM
Subject: Re: WS-Addressing mapping (was Re: What is
Message.set/getCallableReference used for?)
Yes, I'm proposing what I said in [1] with a tuscany:CallbackReference
reference
Comments inline.
[snip]
Simon Nash wrote:
I agree that we need a conclusion. I believe the detailed proposal below
supports all the SCA semantics and I'd like to propose that we go with it
for Tuscany 1.0.
Any comments, questions, agreement, or disagreement?
Simon
I was initially
will be the key for
the correlation.
Do you agree?
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 3:43 PM
Subject: Re: WS-Addressing mapping (was Re: What is
Message.set
-protocol.html.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 3:45 PM
Subject: Re: WS-Addressing mapping (was Re: What is
Message.set/getCallableReference used for?)
More thoughts
it.
Simon
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message - From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 4:09 PM
Subject: Re: WS-Addressing mapping (was Re: What is
Message.set/getCallableReference used for?)
Simon Nash wrote:
Until
-Addressing mapping (was Re: What is
Message.set/getCallableReference used for?)
Comments at the end.
Simon
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
More thoughts at the bottom.
Simon Nash wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
At this moment, the From of the Message is used for the reference of
the source
- From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 3:45 PM
Subject: Re: WS-Addressing mapping (was Re: What is
Message.set/getCallableReference used for?)
More thoughts at the bottom.
Simon Nash wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote
-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 4:09 PM
Subject: Re: WS-Addressing mapping (was Re: What is
Message.set/getCallableReference used for?)
Simon Nash wrote:
Until now we have always held this information in the wsa:From element.
However, in thinking about what is really going
-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 4:09 PM
Subject: Re: WS-Addressing mapping (was Re: What is
Message.set/getCallableReference used for?)
Simon Nash wrote:
Until now we have always held this information in the wsa:From
element
Until now we have always held this information in the wsa:From element.
However, in thinking about what is really going on here in WS-Addressing
terms, I believe we should be putting it in the wsa:To element instead.
The wsa:To element is mandatory for WS-Addressing, but we are not
sending it
Simon Nash wrote:
Until now we have always held this information in the wsa:From element.
However, in thinking about what is really going on here in WS-Addressing
terms, I believe we should be putting it in the wsa:To element instead.
The wsa:To element is mandatory for WS-Addressing, but we are
: Re: WS-Addressing mapping (was Re: What is
Message.set/getCallableReference used for?)
Simon Nash wrote:
Until now we have always held this information in the wsa:From element.
However, in thinking about what is really going on here in WS-Addressing
terms, I believe we should be putting
18 matches
Mail list logo
