Mike Edwards wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Are you guys still making changes to the BPEL code?
I'd like to be able to work with BPEL components in the domain without
having to boot the whole runtime. I'd like to do it sometime later
this week but for that to work I'll need to split
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Are you guys still making changes to the BPEL code?
I'd like to be able to work with BPEL components in the domain without
having to boot the whole runtime. I'd like to do it sometime later this
week but for that to work I'll need to split implementation-bpel in
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Are you guys still making changes to the BPEL code?
I'd like to be able to work with BPEL components in the domain without
having to boot the whole runtime. I'd like to do it sometime later this
week but for that to work I'll need to split implementation-bpel in
Cool Mike, this is very good improvement for the bpel impl...
BTW, could you please check if you have committed one of the new model
classes : BPELPartnerLinkTypeExt
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Mike Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Are you guys still making
Luciano Resende wrote:
Cool Mike, this is very good improvement for the bpel impl...
BTW, could you please check if you have committed one of the new model
classes : BPELPartnerLinkTypeExt
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Mike Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luciano,
The class
Mike Edwards wrote:
Ashwini Kumar Jeksani wrote:
Hi,
Does Tuscany support SCA Extentions to WS-BPEL? If it doesn't then I
guess we could look into that one as well.
Thanks Regards
Ashwini Kumar Jeksani
Ashwini,
Which extensions are thinking about?
Currently I am working on code that
Mike Edwards wrote:
Ashwini Kumar Jeksani wrote:
Hi,
Does Tuscany support SCA Extentions to WS-BPEL? If it doesn't then I
guess we could look into that one as well.
Thanks Regards
Ashwini Kumar Jeksani
Ashwini,
Which extensions are thinking about?
Currently I am working on code that
This is great, various good ideas and various volunteers...
I'll raise JIRAs to better track progress with these items.
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Edwards wrote:
Ashwini Kumar Jeksani wrote:
Hi,
Does Tuscany support SCA Extentions
: Mike Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 8:41 PM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: What's next for SCA BPEL Integration
Ashwini Kumar Jeksani wrote:
Hi,
Does Tuscany support SCA Extentions to WS-BPEL? If it doesn't then I guess we
could look into that one
@ws.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What's next for SCA BPEL Integration
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:53 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Now that we
Ashwini Kumar Jeksani wrote:
Hi,
Does Tuscany support SCA Extentions to WS-BPEL? If it doesn't then I guess we
could look into that one as well.
Thanks Regards
Ashwini Kumar Jeksani
Ashwini,
Which extensions are thinking about?
Currently I am working on code that scans the BPEL process
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Matthieu Riou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:53 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ant elder wrote:
These are all the additional dependencies brought in with the Tuscany
implementation.bpel extension, are any of them obviously not necessary?
activeio-2.0-r118.jar
axion-1.0-M3-dev.jar
backport-util-concurrent-3.0.jar
common-2.2.3.jar
commons-codec-1.3.jar
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Mike Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
These are all the additional dependencies brought in with the Tuscany
implementation.bpel extension, are any of them obviously not necessary?
activeio-2.0-r118.jar
axion-1.0-M3-dev.jar
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:53 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Now that we are making more progress with the SCA BPEL
Luciano Resende wrote:
Now that we are making more progress with the SCA BPEL integration
and have figured out how to make References to work, let's discuss
what could be the next steps on this area. Below are couple examples
of what we could do next
- WS-BPEL Process Introspection : Currently
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Now that we are making more progress with the SCA BPEL integration
and have figured out how to make References to work, let's discuss
what could be the next steps on this area. Below are couple examples
of what we
On Nov 2, 2006, at 4:37 AM, Andy Piper wrote:
At 17:21 24/10/2006, Jim Marino wrote:
Existing server integration is a nice-to-have but IMO we require a
standalone environment that can support the full range of SCA
features which is not easily done in the former.
FWIW if you want to drive
At 17:21 24/10/2006, Jim Marino wrote:
Existing server integration is a nice-to-have but IMO we require a
standalone environment that can support the full range of SCA
features which is not easily done in the former.
FWIW if you want to drive adoption then I think this is more than
, activating all the components with dangling
wires and then resolving all the wires and activating the whole
composite.
Ta
Meeraj
-Original Message-
From: Jim Marino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 October 2006 08:23
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: What's next for SCA
between composites.
Jim
Ta
Meeraj
-Original Message-
From: Jim Marino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 October 2006 08:23
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: What's next for SCA?
On Oct 24, 2006, at 4:48 PM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Hi,
I have been having few
(e.g. spawning
threads and calling into SCA code may yield unpredictable results;
use WorkManager).
Jim
Ta
Meeraj
From: Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: What's next for SCA?
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:21:45 -0700
With M2 mostly behind us, I'd like look forward to things that we can
tackle next for SCA/Java.
I think there is still some cleanup to be done - fixing bugs that we
find in M2, cleaning up some of the compromises we made, and so
forth. As part of that I think we still need more coverage on
On Oct 24, 2006, at 9:37 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
With M2 mostly behind us, I'd like look forward to things that we
can tackle next for SCA/Java.
I think there is still some cleanup to be done - fixing bugs that
we find in M2, cleaning up some of the compromises we made, and so
forth.
pooling
for stateless components a possible solution?
Ta
Meeraj
From: Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: What's next for SCA?
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:21:45 -0700
On Oct 24, 2006, at 9:37 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
With M2
25 matches
Mail list logo
