To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 11:53 AM
Subject: Re: real basic question on Composite impl (recursion)
Let's agree (or disagree) on the following statements one by one.
1) We'll have two component services C1/svc1 and C2/innerService.
Yes
2) C2/innerService is configur
ient.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "Scott Kurz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 5:28 AM
To:
Subject: Re: real basic question on Composite impl (recursion)
Thanks for responding Raymond,
That's not what I env
...
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "Scott Kurz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 5:28 AM
To:
Subject: Re: real basic question on Composite impl (recursion)
Thanks for responding Raymond,
That's not
t think binding.sca
> plays a role in your scenario.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> --
> From: "Scott Kurz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 1:53 PM
> To:
> Subject: real basic question on Compos
think binding.sca
plays a role in your scenario.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "Scott Kurz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 1:53 PM
To:
Subject: real basic question on Composite impl (recursion)
I think this has been dis
I think this has been discussed before on this list.. but I'm not sure or
forget where we ended up.
In the case that you have a non-default binding on a component service
defined with an inner composite which
is in turn used as a component impl, what happens if the service is not
re-defined overri
