stien Delfino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 2007-09-05 17:16
To: tuscany-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Client requested features Was: Policy samples? (showcasing the
"killer feature" of separation of concerns)
Hi Jeff, Thanks for some very good and useful input!
I add
Hi Jeff, Thanks for some very good and useful input!
I added some comments inline.
[snip]
Anderson, Jeff T (CA - Toronto) wrote:
This is great news, that ties into an e-mail that I was just formulating this
morning concerning additional features that have been requested for our client
the list
hey
> feel that Tuscany will be in a position to start tackling some of these
> requirements that would be great.
> Regards
> Jeff
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Venkata Krishnan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thu 2007-08-30 04:40
Two comments inline.
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
The policy framework implementation is underway. We have some basic things
in place which allows the inclusion of policy intents and policysets into an
assembly model. There is simply sample policy that we have put in place
along with the echo-
30 04:40
To: tuscany-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Policy samples? (showcasing the "killer feature" of separation of
concerns)
Hi,
The policy framework implementation is underway. We have some basic things
in place which allows the inclusion of policy intents and policysets into an
asse
Hi,
The policy framework implementation is underway. We have some basic things
in place which allows the inclusion of policy intents and policysets into an
assembly model. There is simply sample policy that we have put in place
along with the echo-binding-extension sample to test this basic fram
Hi,
I'm currently evaluating SCA and Tuscany. I really like much of what I've
seen so far, especially when experimenting with the assembly model and
different bindings. What I'd like to know more about is the policy
framework. I think the clear separation of concern that SCA promotes is a
"killer"
