On 02/24/2011 11:55 AM, Walter Prins wrote:
On 24 February 2011 16:22, Dave Angel wrote:
(Is there a reason you double-spaced all that code? It makes it very hard
to read, and quite difficult to quote, since I had to delete every other
line.)
For what it's worth the code came out perfectl
On 24 February 2011 16:22, Dave Angel wrote:
>
> (Is there a reason you double-spaced all that code? It makes it very hard
> to read, and quite difficult to quote, since I had to delete every other
> line.)
>
For what it's worth the code came out perfectly fine on my email reader
(GMail). (No d
Dear All,
Thank you for your advise, it's helpful for me.
NB: To DaveA, It was copy-paste from my notepad so the indentation went
wrong :(
+---+--+---+
| py | h | x0r |
+---+--+---+
■ 1 3 0 E2 C 9 ■
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
To u
On 01/-10/-28163 02:59 PM, pyhx0r wrote:
Dear All,
multiple = 1024 if a_kilobyte_is_1024_bytes else 1000
for suffix in SUFFIXES[multiple]:
size /= multiple
if size< multiple:
return '{0:.1f} {1}'.format(size, suffix)
I’ve shorted the code be:
On 24 February 2011 14:52, pyhx0r wrote:
> *Why do in my code, it loops to all values and not in Mark Pilgrim’s code?
> *
>
>
Because in Mark's code the loop is terminated by the return statement
(contained in the utility function approximate_size().) In your code you've
removed the entire funct
