Donz, you ignorant slut, ...
Original Message
Subject: [TV orNotTV] Re: Has Seth Meyers won the Reege derby?
From: donz5 <do...@aol.com>
Date: Wed, July 11, 2012 1:42 pm
To: TVorNotTV <tvornottv@googlegroups.com>
On Jul 11, 10:59 am, Dave Feldman <imponder
On Jul 11, 10:59 am, Dave Feldman wrote:
> Kevin M. asks a bunch of good questions:
>
> I say this as someone who frequently comments on the sharp, continuing
>
> > decline in SNL quality: Is Seth Meyers a "get"? I mean, is he likely
> > to draw in viewers or keep the Regis fans? All I know of him
The Hollywood Reporter is now reporting that Seth is saying no-no:
"A "Saturday Night Live" cast member has responded to widespread reports
that he’s the leading contender to replace Regis Philbin on “Live with
Kelly!” Seth Meyers, who’s also “SNL’s” head writer, tells the South
Florida
Sun-Se
That question actually got answered way back in 1981, when Dick Ebersol
ordered that the only musical guests to be booked would be "arena rock
acts" (in response to Jean Doumanian's predeliction for trendy New Wave
bands that played at CBGB both in her disastrous year as showrunner and her
stint bo
Kevin M. asks a bunch of good questions:
I say this as someone who frequently comments on the sharp, continuing
> decline in SNL quality: Is Seth Meyers a "get"? I mean, is he likely
> to draw in viewers or keep the Regis fans? All I know of him is his
> snarky Update persona -- is there more
On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 2:54:45 PM UTC-4, Mark Jeffries wrote:
>
> Wasn't "Ebert and Roeper" decided by a coin toss, as was everything else
> involving billing and order for Gene and Roger?
> Siskel and Ebert" became "Ebert and Roeper," Kelly will move up a notch.
>
>>
>>
> Roger Ebert and
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Kevin M. wrote:
> I say this as someone who frequently comments on the sharp, continuing
> decline in SNL quality: Is Seth Meyers a "get"? I mean, is he likely
> to draw in viewers or keep the Regis fans? All I know of him is his
> snarky Update persona -- is there
I say this as someone who frequently comments on the sharp, continuing
decline in SNL quality: Is Seth Meyers a "get"? I mean, is he likely
to draw in viewers or keep the Regis fans? All I know of him is his
snarky Update persona -- is there more to the guy than that?
Bear in mind as I ask all of
Wasn't "Ebert and Roeper" decided by a coin toss, as was everything else
involving billing and order for Gene and Roger?
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Diner wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 8:33:58 AM UTC-4, Jon Delfin wrote:
>>
>> So, what'll it be, Live With Kelly and Seth, or Live Wit
Correction: He is not married, so disregard that point - thanks.
On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 8:26:53 AM UTC-4, Ron Casalotti wrote:
>
> He's the one:
>
>- He has good chemistry with Kelly
>- He's quick witted, able to riff on Kelly's or a guest's off-the-cuff
>remark
>- The job fits
On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 8:33:58 AM UTC-4, Jon Delfin wrote:
>
> So, what'll it be, Live With Kelly and Seth, or Live With Seth and
> Kelly? And how many man-hours do you suppose will be wasted on this
> vital decision?
>
>
Too many!
But just as "Siskel and Ebert" became "Ebert and Roeper,"
So, what'll it be, Live With Kelly and Seth, or Live With Seth and
Kelly? And how many man-hours do you suppose will be wasted on this
vital decision?
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Ron Casalotti wrote:
> He's the one:
>
> He has good chemistry with Kelly
> He's quick witted, able to riff on
He's the one:
- He has good chemistry with Kelly
- He's quick witted, able to riff on Kelly's or a guest's off-the-cuff
remark
- The job fits his schedule
- He has the same sarcastic sense of humor as Kelly
- He's physically compatible (i.e., doesn't tower over Kelly like, for
13 matches
Mail list logo
