: Mon, November 15, 2010 3:21:09 PM
Subject: [TV orNotTV] Re: J. Stew sits with Rachel Maddow on just what the heck
he meant
What irritated me about the interview was Stewart's mantra of
neutrality and "we just present the clips, we don't take sides."
Bullshit. They've slam
The problem with the below is that the traditional media are too lazy
(and corporate) to go beyond the "one side (usually Fox and the
Republicans) does it, so we must find equivalent evidence to 'prove'
the other side (usually MSNBC and the Democrats) does it as well."
Fox is all about advocacy fo
donz5, to PGage and Kevin:
> It sounds like not many here actually _watch_ Keith on any sort of
> regular basis. He discontinued his "Worst Person in the World" weeks
> ago.
I was about to tell him that Saturday, but the hour got late and I was
pooped...
--
BOB
--
TV or Not TV The Smart
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 3:27 PM, PGage wrote:
>
> I am not sure if he has announced a permanent termination of the segment
> over the last two weeks. I don't watch Countdown anymore regularly, and have
> not since the 2008 election coverage. I do review selected segments on his
> website fairly o
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:17 AM, donz5 wrote:
> It sounds like not many here actually _watch_ Keith on any sort of
> regular basis. He discontinued his "Worst Person in the World" weeks
> ago.
>
True, though to be fair to Kevin I believe he has acknowledged that
somewhere in this thread, or one
It sounds like not many here actually _watch_ Keith on any sort of
regular basis. He discontinued his "Worst Person in the World" weeks
ago.
--
TV or Not TV The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to th
t;> that they lean left (as opposed to the network's new asinine "lean forward"
> >> slogan) but none of them have come out and endorsed a candidate on the
> >> air.
>
> >> - Original Message -
> >> From: "K.M. Richards"
Kevin asked...
How many different times in Bush's eight years did Keith call for his
removal from office?
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 2:49 AM, PGage wrote:
> I give up - how many times did Olbermann name Bush the WPITW? I have Obama
> on that list at least once (though before he was elected Presiden
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Kevin M. wrote:
> How many different times in Bush's eight years did Keith call for his
> removal from office? That's what you missed. If he set a standard for
> all politicians and then reacted the same way regardless of who let
> him down, I could accept that. B
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 1:26 AM, PGage wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Kevin M. wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Wesley McGee
>> wrote:
>> If Keith wasn't politically partisan, when Obama capitulated and
>> Americans ended up with a health care bill that helped nobody an
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Kevin M. wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Wesley McGee
> wrote:
> If Keith wasn't politically partisan, when Obama capitulated and
> Americans ended up with a health care bill that helped nobody and
> omitted a public option, why wasn't Keith calling f
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Wesley McGee wrote:
If Keith wasn't politically partisan, when Obama capitulated and
Americans ended up with a health care bill that helped nobody and
omitted a public option, why wasn't Keith calling for his immediate
impeachment and removal from office? Why hasn
When Jon Stewart went on to to talk about ideology and partisanship and Fox
News and MSNBC, by way of comparing cable news to his show he came up with
the analogy which -- I may be the only person who thinks this but -- I think
is not a great analogy. "One of my favorite things..Anderson Cooper, I
I would agree, and go further to state that political parties (at
least the two party system in place) hinders the process, as does any
advocacy of it. I firmly believe that it no longer matters whether a
Republican or Democrat wins a given election, because ultimately
America will continue to lose
Subject: Re: [TV orNotTV] Re: J. Stew sits with Rachel Maddow on just what the
heck he meant
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Kevin M. wrote:
So Donz, you believe that MSNBC is nonpartisan and its hosts offer
>nonbiased news and information? Because I don't think Stewart is
>claiming MS
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Kevin M. wrote:
> So Donz, you believe that MSNBC is nonpartisan and its hosts offer
> nonbiased news and information? Because I don't think Stewart is
> claiming MSNBC is like FoxNews, but the claim is they are not
> producing journalism free of a political slant
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Kevin M. wrote:
> [T]he claim is [MSNBC] are not
> producing journalism free of a political slant, and the political
> slant does more harm than good. At some point along the way, MSNBC
> abandoned being a source of journalism in favor of being a showcase
> for o
#x27;s weeknight lineup would deny
>> that they lean left (as opposed to the network's new asinine "lean forward"
>> slogan) but none of them have come out and endorsed a candidate on the
>> air.
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -
>>
ir.
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "K.M. Richards"
> To: "TVorNotTV"
> Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010 10:43 AM
> Subject: [TV orNotTV] Re: J. Stew sits with Rachel Maddow on just what the
>
> heck he meant
>
> A nitpick, if I may,
ndorsed a candidate on the
air.
- Original Message -
From: "K.M. Richards"
To: "TVorNotTV"
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010 10:43 AM
Subject: [TV orNotTV] Re: J. Stew sits with Rachel Maddow on just what the
heck he meant
A nitpick, if I may, Kevin.
On Nov 12, 8:53 pm, &qu
A nitpick, if I may, Kevin.
On Nov 12, 8:53 pm, "Kevin M." wrote:
>And whereas Maddow stated neither she nor any other member of
> MSNBC's news team has endorsed a candidate, Keith's recent newsmaking
> revealed that to not be the truth.
Strictly speaking, Keith did not endorse a candidate. The
21 matches
Mail list logo
