[twitter-dev] Re: API Changes for May 11, 2009

2009-05-14 Thread Doug Williams
Can you open an issue for this so we can track it? I'll take a look today. Thanks, Doug On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 3:34 AM, rlamfink wrote: > > Using the blocks/blocking API, the page parameter has no effect. I > always get the first page, no matter what page number is in the URL > parameter. Als

[twitter-dev] Re: API Changes for May 11, 2009

2009-05-14 Thread rlamfink
Using the blocks/blocking API, the page parameter has no effect. I always get the first page, no matter what page number is in the URL parameter. Also I don't get just 20 users in the list as the documentation says. I get more.

[twitter-dev] Re: API Changes for May 11, 2009

2009-05-11 Thread Carlos
Any particular reason the blocks/exist function returns the information for the user requested if the block exist and a hash error response if not? I would think following the same kind of format as the friendship exist function would make more sense; something like: true/false An error response