Matt,
Could you clarify how [list identifier] works? In my case, I used
(something like):
/1/lists/update.xml?list_id=123name=testdescription=test2
and it worked.
However, other combinations of slug, name (old param), and identifiers
failed with 400/404's (depending on permutation).
I realize Twitter is now possibly anti-developer, but do you think you
could tell us when soon is for the retirement of the cursor-less
friends/ids and followers/ids calls? To rely on especially slow
cursor calls is a huge headache, and far slower than simply getting
ALL ids as we currently can
Excuse my message from earlier... turns out cursors aren't so bad.
(Although it would still be good to know when they are going to swap
over.)
On Mar 26, 12:58 am, Patrick Collins patcollins1...@gmail.com wrote:
I realize Twitter is now possibly anti-developer, but do you think you
could tell
Not that my opinion matters, but this one sucks:
[Soon] followers/ids and friends/ids is being updated to set the
cursor to
-1 if it isn't supplied during the request. This changes the default
response format.
Paging these results is slow. I've been avoiding it whenever possible.
I don't suppose
100% Agree
On 26 mar, 00:34, DustyReagan dustyrea...@gmail.com wrote:
Not that my opinion matters, but this one sucks:
[Soon] followers/ids and friends/ids is being updated to set the
cursor to
-1 if it isn't supplied during the request. This changes the default
response format.
Paging
