Good luck and I look forward to reading some drafts, yeah?
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Stefna wrote:
>
> I've submitted a ticket with following content:
> *** *** ***
> I am a 23 years old student of informatics at AGH Universtity of
> Science and Technology in Cracow (Poland). Due to a rap
http://www.searchenginejournal.com/twitter-hashtags/9419/
On Sep 25, 1:46 pm, Kevin Mesiab wrote:
> Good luck and I look forward to reading some drafts, yeah?
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Stefna wrote:
>
> > I've submitted a ticket with following content:
> > *** *** ***
> > I am a
Good luck buddy.. Btw I'm curious, What exactly are you referring to
or focussing on when you say 'syntactic meaning of tweets' ?
I mean I'd appreciate a clarification on 'syntactic meaning to whom ?'
and 'syntactic meaning of tweets in what context ?'
Just wondering..
Best Regards,
Nalin
On 9
Careful! Stefna was talking about semantic meaning. Not
"syntactic" ...
But I think you're right - Stefna, please us tell a bit more about the
context.
And - what do you think of when you say "strict formed data"?
What exactly do you want to achieve?
Maybe your promoter should tell you in more det
Thank you all for the feedback.
My main motivation for posting this thread was to gather some loose
ideas. One man’s trash is another man’s treasure, posting a link costs
nothing but saved a lot of mine time.
"strict formed data" - 140 chars, #tag, @username, RT etc. - that's
why there are so ma
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Stefna wrote:
>
> "strict formed data" - 140 chars, #tag, @username, RT etc. - that's
> why there are so many sites presenting graphs, charts, trends,
> tendencies etc.
I suspect a large part of the answer to that is simply "Because they can."
Unlike other large
A small group of us (mainly Harvard students, but others as well) had
similar questions a few months back and we've started digging into the
research pretty heavily (also doing contracting/consulting). Our group
is called the Web Ecology Project and we've released a handful of
academic (but access