I believe that search does not return statuses of protected users (even when
authenticated, though I may be wrong and should be corrected if I am). In
that case, yes, you could potentially receive fewer results than
statuses/mentions.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 09:56, Joseph Cheek wrote:
>
> Quick
Along the same line, updates from accounts considered spamming
wouldn't be included in search results too.
--
Hwee-Boon
On Sep 17, 12:07 am, JDG wrote:
> I believe that search does not return statuses of protected users (even when
> authenticated, though I may be wrong and should be corrected i
so statuses/mentions will retrieve mentions from protected users'
timelines, even if you are not authorized to see them?
Joseph
JDG wrote:
> I believe that search does not return statuses of protected users
> (even when authenticated, though I may be wrong and should be
> corrected if I am). In
will they be included in statuses/mentions?
Joseph
Hwee-Boon Yar wrote:
> Along the same line, updates from accounts considered spamming
> wouldn't be included in search results too.
>
> --
> Hwee-Boon
>
> On Sep 17, 12:07 am, JDG wrote:
>
>> I believe that search does not return statuses of
Those will, so long as they haven't actually been suspended. As for your
other question, you would only receive mentions from protected accounts that
you were following (i.e. accounts to which you had access).
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:35, Joseph Cheek wrote:
>
> will they be included in status
thanks - i'll change my client code!
Joseph Cheek
jos...@cheek.com, www.cheek.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/cheekdotcom
JDG wrote:
> Those will, so long as they haven't actually been suspended. As for
> your other question, you would only receive mentions from protected
> accounts that you w
