Makes sense. On the web interface you only ever see update1 to manually
retweet.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 04:16, Tim Haines tmhai...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll give you an unofficial yes. This is exactly the way I understand it
will work. If you star any of the RT's it's update1 that gets the stars
I did an experiment.
user1 tweets update1
user2 retweets update1 as update2 (a RT, with update1 embedded)
user3 retweets update2, the embedded update is update1 instead of
update2.
I can't find documentation on this. Is this the expected behavoir?
--
Hwee-Boon
I'll give you an unofficial yes. This is exactly the way I understand it
will work. If you star any of the RT's it's update1 that gets the stars
too.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Hwee-Boon Yar hweeb...@gmail.com wrote:
I did an experiment.
user1 tweets update1
user2 retweets update1 as