Hello
Investigating the code for ARM Versatile port, I've found this weird
piece of code. If you look in $(UBOOT)/board/versatile/flash.c, line
100, flash_init() :
unsigned long flash_init (void)
{
int i;
ulong size = 0;
for (i = 0; i < CFG_MAX_FLASH_BANKS; i++) {
switch (i) {
get_prom function was used __attriute__ , but it is not enable.
ax88796.o does not do link besides ne2000.o. When ld is carried
out, get_prom function of ax88796.c is ignored.
This problem is a thing by specifications of ld.
I checked and test this patch on SuperH and MIPS.
Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro
Remi Lefevre wrote:
> At last, I have some doubt about the fdt "timebase-frequency" value.
> It seems to be set to (bus_clk / 4) on mpc8260, but I cannot find
> in the mpc8270 (mpc8280) user manual any confirmation. Does this
> value only depends on cpu or could the board have any influence on it ?
Hi,
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>>
>> Interestingly enough, dcbst is a *data* cache store, run in the *icache*
>> flush routine. I assume this is intended to flush out any instructions
>> that are stuck in the dcache due to writes (self modifying code and/or
>> loaded/copied code)
Added as a convenience for other platforms that uses MPC8360 (has 8 UCC).
Six eth interface is chosen because the platform I am using combines
UCC1&2 and UCC3&4 as 1000 Eth and the other four UCCs as 10/100 Eth.
Signed-off-by: Richard Retanubun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Thank you for all the feedbac
Ralph, Wolfgang:
I have checked with the 5121 validation code for PATA and it uses the
IPS clock for all the timing. I think the old rev1 manual is wrong and
the new rev2 manual is misleading. The PATA clock is the same speed as
the IPS clock. Don't use the LPC clock.
John
John Rigby wrote
This patch provides support for AFEB9260 board, a product of
OpenSource hardware and software. Some commertial projects
are made with this design. A board is basically AT91SAM9260-EK
with some modifications and different peripherals and different
parts used. Main purpose of this project is to gain
Detlev Zundel schrieb:
>> Has anybody tried to (and succeeded in) speed up u-boot?
>
> We are currently working on such a speedup bringing U-Boot up to par
> with Linux. I am confident that we can post our results in the next
> week.
>
Sounds promising!
> PS: Wow, message-mode in Emacs wants a
Sergey Lapin wrote:
> This patch provides support for AFEB9260 board, a product of
> OpenSource hardware and software. Some commertial projects
> are made with this design. A board is basically AT91SAM9260-EK
> with some modifications and different peripherals and different
> parts used. Main purpo
Hi Michael,
> Joakim Tjernlund transmode.se> writes:
>
>>
>> On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 08:45 +, Michael Lawnick wrote:
>> > Hi *,
>> >
>> > please feel free to correct me if I tell sh**:
>> > As far as I was told, bad JFFS2 boot performance of u-boot is result of not
>> > supporting summary. (B
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 12:49 +, Michael Lawnick wrote:
> Joakim Tjernlund transmode.se> writes:
>
> > > Has anybody tried to (and succeeded in) speed up u-boot?
> >
> > Yes, there was an attempt some time ago(months or a year, dunno) where
> > someone had improved scanning dramatically, patch
Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Sep 23, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
>> * Use new find_cmd_tbl() to process sub-commands
>>
>> If this looks good I'll go ahead and clean it up for the other
>> arches and OSes.
>>
>> ---
>> common/cmd_bootm.c | 142 -
>> include/image
Ping. Please consider making this into the upcoming release.
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> diff --git a/README.imx31 b/README.imx31
> deleted file mode 100644
> index f545f01..000
> --- a/README.imx31
> +++ /d
On Sep 23, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> * Use new find_cmd_tbl() to process sub-commands
>
> If this looks good I'll go ahead and clean it up for the other
> arches and OSes.
>
> ---
> common/cmd_bootm.c | 142 -
> include/image.h| 20 -
> lib_ppc/
Split to meet mailing list size limit
Initial addition of eNET files - builds clean but will not run until
additional i386 code changes are made
Signed-off-by: Graeme Russ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
diff --git a/MAKEALL b/MAKEALL
index 9ccb9ac..6f65870 100755
--- a/MAKEALL
+++ b/MAKEALL
@@ -645,6 +
Hi Richard & Wolfgang,
richardretanubun wrote:
> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
>> Dear richardretanubun,
>>
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>>> Please disregard V2. V1 is correct, except for this change:
>> So you will submit a V3?
> I am not so sure about it.
>
> This patch came to be whe
Added relocation code
Removed temporary testing code
Signed-off-by: Graeme Russ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
diff --git a/board/eNET/eNET.c b/board/eNET/eNET.c
index 1b4af58..5355fb6 100644
--- a/board/eNET/eNET.c
+++ b/board/eNET/eNET.c
@@ -45,40 +45,6 @@ DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
#define PRINTF(fmt,ar
Renamed show_boot_progress in assembler init phase to
show_boot_progress_asm to avoid link conflicts with C version
Signed-off-by: Graeme Russ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
diff --git a/board/sc520_cdp/sc520_cdp_asm.S b/board/sc520_cdp/sc520_cdp_asm.S
index 6ac5a5d..3a8a03f 100644
--- a/board/sc520_cdp/
Hi All,
I have managed to get the initial port of U-Boot to my custom sc520
(x86) based board built and running and even managed (I think) to get
the fundamentals of the code relocation working (really happy about
that) and I would like some feedback on my mods - specifically the
relocation method
Joakim Tjernlund transmode.se> writes:
> > Has anybody tried to (and succeeded in) speed up u-boot?
>
> Yes, there was an attempt some time ago(months or a year, dunno) where
> someone had improved scanning dramatically, patch was posted to the
> u-boot list. Can't remember who though.
Seems to
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear richardretanubun,
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> Please disregard V2. V1 is correct, except for this change:
>
> So you will submit a V3?
I am not so sure about it.
This patch came to be when I wanted to make it convenient for using u-boot to
test a
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 11:34 +, Michael Lawnick wrote:
> Joakim Tjernlund transmode.se> writes:
>
> >
> > On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 08:45 +, Michael Lawnick wrote:
> > > Hi *,
> > >
> > > please feel free to correct me if I tell sh**:
> > > As far as I was told, bad JFFS2 boot performance of
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Heiko Schocher,
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> The EEprom contains some Manufacturerinformation,
>> which are read from u-boot at boot time, and saved
>> in same Environmentvars.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[snip]
>> +{
>>
Joakim Tjernlund transmode.se> writes:
>
> On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 08:45 +, Michael Lawnick wrote:
> > Hi *,
> >
> > please feel free to correct me if I tell sh**:
> > As far as I was told, bad JFFS2 boot performance of u-boot is result of not
> > supporting summary. (Because there is no JFFS
Hello Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> The EEprom contains some Manufacturerinformation,
>> which are read from u-boot at boot time, and saved
>> in same Environmentvars.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> ---
>> board/keymile/c
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 08:45 +, Michael Lawnick wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> please feel free to correct me if I tell sh**:
> As far as I was told, bad JFFS2 boot performance of u-boot is result of not
> supporting summary. (Because there is no JFFS2 but only JFFS support?)
It is not missing SUMMARY, it
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> also fix CodingStyle issues for the LM75
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/lm75.c | 228
> +++---
> 1 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 123 del
Dear Roman,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> just downloaded ISO image for of ELDK 4.1, ARM targets. After mounted
> it as a 'loop' device on my Debian system, I didn't find script in the
Which "script" didn't you find?
Ther eis sure a programm named "install" there, isn;t it?
> r
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/soft_i2c.c | 24
> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/soft_i2c.c b/drivers/i2c/soft_i2c.c
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> The EEprom contains some Manufacturerinformation,
> which are read from u-boot at boot time, and saved
> in same Environmentvars.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> board/keymile/common/common.c | 285
>
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> As Documented in README, adding a boardspecific Deblocking
Which part of the README are you referring to?
> mechansim via CFG_I2C_INIT_BOARD for the mgcoge and mgsuvd
> board.
Are you talking about doc/I2C_Edge_Conditions?
> This
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Also support CONFIG_I2C_MULTI_BUS for the
> soft_i2c and the cpu/mpc8260/i2c.c driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> board/keymile/mgcoge/mgcoge.c | 93
> ++---
Hi *,
please feel free to correct me if I tell sh**:
As far as I was told, bad JFFS2 boot performance of u-boot is result of not
supporting summary. (Because there is no JFFS2 but only JFFS support?)
So my question:
Has anybody done or is planning in next time (~weeks) to add summary support for
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> common/cmd_i2c.c |9 +
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/common/cmd_i2c.c b/common/cmd_i2c.c
> index ef3928e..414c888 100644
>
Hi Heiko,
On Monday 29 September 2008, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> also fix CodingStyle issues for the LM75
Please don't mix functional changes and coding style changes into one patch. I
suggest that you first send a coding style cleanup patch and then a
functional patch on top of this.
Thanks.
B
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> There are some more extensions, which are for both boards
> and some more boards from this manufacturer will follow soon.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> Makefile|4 +-
> bo
Hello
just downloaded ISO image for of ELDK 4.1, ARM targets. After mounted
it as a 'loop' device on my Debian system, I didn't find script in the
root of ELDK directory tree. What am I supposed to do, is this
distribution installed in another manner? I referred to this page for
instructions - htt
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/keymile/mgsuvd/Makefile |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/keymile/mgsuvd/Makefile b/board/keymile/mgsuvd/Makefile
index af0d400..0326608 100644
--- a/board/keymile/mgsuvd/Makefile
+++ b/board/
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/i2c/soft_i2c.c | 24
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/soft_i2c.c b/drivers/i2c/soft_i2c.c
index f426bbb..bda0aaf 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/soft_i2c.c
+++ b/drivers/i2
The EEprom contains some Manufacturerinformation,
which are read from u-boot at boot time, and saved
in same Environmentvars.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/keymile/common/common.c | 285 +
include/configs/mgcoge.h |5
With this Command it is possible to add new I2C Busses,
which are behind 1 .. n I2C Muxes. Details see README.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
README | 47
common/cmd_i2c.c | 269 +-
cpu/mpc826
As Documented in README, adding a boardspecific Deblocking
mechansim via CFG_I2C_INIT_BOARD for the mgcoge and mgsuvd
board.
This code was originally written by keymile in association
with Anatech and Atmel in 1998. The Code toggels the SCL
until the SCA line goes to High (max. 16 times).
And after
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/configs/mgcoge.h |9 +
include/configs/mgsuvd.h |9 +
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/mgcoge.h b/include/configs/mgcoge.h
index 8cff642..bfbbd45 100644
--- a/includ
also fix CodingStyle issues for the LM75
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/hwmon/lm75.c | 228 +++---
1 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 123 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
index 67a18
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/configs/mgcoge.h |8
include/configs/mgsuvd.h |7 +++
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/mgcoge.h b/include/configs/mgcoge.h
index 159eeae..8cff642 100644
--- a/include/c
Also support CONFIG_I2C_MULTI_BUS for the
soft_i2c and the cpu/mpc8260/i2c.c driver.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/keymile/mgcoge/mgcoge.c | 93 ++---
board/keymile/mgsuvd/mgsuvd.c | 13 ++
cpu/mpc8260/i2c.c |
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
common/cmd_i2c.c |9 +
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/cmd_i2c.c b/common/cmd_i2c.c
index ef3928e..414c888 100644
--- a/common/cmd_i2c.c
+++ b/common/cmd_i2c.c
@@ -1182,6 +1182,12 @@ int do_sdra
47 matches
Mail list logo
