Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
common/cmd_i2c.c |9 +
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/cmd_i2c.c b/common/cmd_i2c.c
index ef3928e..414c888 100644
--- a/common/cmd_i2c.c
+++ b/common/cmd_i2c.c
@@ -1182,6 +1182,12 @@ int do_sdram
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/configs/mgcoge.h |8
include/configs/mgsuvd.h |7 +++
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/mgcoge.h b/include/configs/mgcoge.h
index 159eeae..8cff642 100644
---
also fix CodingStyle issues for the LM75
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/hwmon/lm75.c | 228 +++---
1 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 123 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
index
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/configs/mgcoge.h |9 +
include/configs/mgsuvd.h |9 +
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/mgcoge.h b/include/configs/mgcoge.h
index 8cff642..bfbbd45 100644
---
As Documented in README, adding a boardspecific Deblocking
mechansim via CFG_I2C_INIT_BOARD for the mgcoge and mgsuvd
board.
This code was originally written by keymile in association
with Anatech and Atmel in 1998. The Code toggels the SCL
until the SCA line goes to High (max. 16 times).
And
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
There are some more extensions, which are for both boards
and some more boards from this manufacturer will follow soon.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Makefile|4 +-
Hi Heiko,
On Monday 29 September 2008, Heiko Schocher wrote:
also fix CodingStyle issues for the LM75
Please don't mix functional changes and coding style changes into one patch. I
suggest that you first send a coding style cleanup patch and then a
functional patch on top of this.
Thanks.
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
common/cmd_i2c.c |9 +
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/cmd_i2c.c b/common/cmd_i2c.c
index ef3928e..414c888 100644
---
Hi *,
please feel free to correct me if I tell sh**:
As far as I was told, bad JFFS2 boot performance of u-boot is result of not
supporting summary. (Because there is no JFFS2 but only JFFS support?)
So my question:
Has anybody done or is planning in next time (~weeks) to add summary support for
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
As Documented in README, adding a boardspecific Deblocking
Which part of the README are you referring to?
mechansim via CFG_I2C_INIT_BOARD for the mgcoge and mgsuvd
board.
Are you talking about doc/I2C_Edge_Conditions?
This code
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
The EEprom contains some Manufacturerinformation,
which are read from u-boot at boot time, and saved
in same Environmentvars.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
board/keymile/common/common.c | 285
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/i2c/soft_i2c.c | 24
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/soft_i2c.c b/drivers/i2c/soft_i2c.c
index
Dear Roman,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
just downloaded ISO image for of ELDK 4.1, ARM targets. After mounted
it as a 'loop' device on my Debian system, I didn't find script in the
Which script didn't you find?
Ther eis sure a programm named install there, isn;t it?
root of
Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernlund at transmode.se writes:
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 08:45 +, Michael Lawnick wrote:
Hi *,
please feel free to correct me if I tell sh**:
As far as I was told, bad JFFS2 boot performance of u-boot is result of not
supporting summary. (Because there is
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
The EEprom contains some Manufacturerinformation,
which are read from u-boot at boot time, and saved
in same Environmentvars.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
+{
+int xcode = 0;
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 11:34 +, Michael Lawnick wrote:
Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernlund at transmode.se writes:
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 08:45 +, Michael Lawnick wrote:
Hi *,
please feel free to correct me if I tell sh**:
As far as I was told, bad JFFS2 boot performance
Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernlund at transmode.se writes:
Has anybody tried to (and succeeded in) speed up u-boot?
Yes, there was an attempt some time ago(months or a year, dunno) where
someone had improved scanning dramatically, patch was posted to the
u-boot list. Can't remember who
Hi All,
I have managed to get the initial port of U-Boot to my custom sc520
(x86) based board built and running and even managed (I think) to get
the fundamentals of the code relocation working (really happy about
that) and I would like some feedback on my mods - specifically the
relocation
Renamed show_boot_progress in assembler init phase to
show_boot_progress_asm to avoid link conflicts with C version
Signed-off-by: Graeme Russ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
diff --git a/board/sc520_cdp/sc520_cdp_asm.S b/board/sc520_cdp/sc520_cdp_asm.S
index 6ac5a5d..3a8a03f 100644
---
Hi Richard Wolfgang,
richardretanubun wrote:
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear richardretanubun,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Please disregard V2. V1 is correct, except for this change:
So you will submit a V3?
I am not so sure about it.
This patch came to be when I wanted to make
On Sep 23, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
* Use new find_cmd_tbl() to process sub-commands
If this looks good I'll go ahead and clean it up for the other
arches and OSes.
---
common/cmd_bootm.c | 142 -
include/image.h| 20 -
lib_ppc/bootm.c
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Sep 23, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
* Use new find_cmd_tbl() to process sub-commands
If this looks good I'll go ahead and clean it up for the other
arches and OSes.
---
common/cmd_bootm.c | 142 -
include/image.h| 20
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 12:49 +, Michael Lawnick wrote:
Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernlund at transmode.se writes:
Has anybody tried to (and succeeded in) speed up u-boot?
Yes, there was an attempt some time ago(months or a year, dunno) where
someone had improved scanning
Hi Michael,
Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernlund at transmode.se writes:
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 08:45 +, Michael Lawnick wrote:
Hi *,
please feel free to correct me if I tell sh**:
As far as I was told, bad JFFS2 boot performance of u-boot is result of not
supporting summary.
Ralph, Wolfgang:
I have checked with the 5121 validation code for PATA and it uses the
IPS clock for all the timing. I think the old rev1 manual is wrong and
the new rev2 manual is misleading. The PATA clock is the same speed as
the IPS clock. Don't use the LPC clock.
John
John Rigby
Added as a convenience for other platforms that uses MPC8360 (has 8 UCC).
Six eth interface is chosen because the platform I am using combines
UCC12 and UCC34 as 1000 Eth and the other four UCCs as 10/100 Eth.
Signed-off-by: Richard Retanubun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Thank you for all the feedback
Remi Lefevre wrote:
At last, I have some doubt about the fdt timebase-frequency value.
It seems to be set to (bus_clk / 4) on mpc8260, but I cannot find
in the mpc8270 (mpc8280) user manual any confirmation. Does this
value only depends on cpu or could the board have any influence on it ?
I
27 matches
Mail list logo
