Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/6] fsl_esdhc: Add device tree fixups

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > This patch implements fdt_fixup_esdhc() function that is used to fixup > the device tree. > > The function adds status = "disabled" propery if esdhc pins muxed away, > otherwise it fixups clock-frequency for esdhc nodes. > > Signed-off-by:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fsl: Don't spew messages related to PHY fixup of device tree

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > Converted print statements that didn't have much meaning beyond > debug from printf() to debug(). > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala I decided to solve this by removing the printfs. They aren't really useful for debugging, unless you're debugging

Re: [U-Boot] JFFS2 scanning bug

> Hi Mark, > > Don't you have JTAG debugger so you could find where exactly it hangs? > Or you can try adding debugging printf's to the source... I can't > reproduce your problem myself so that info would be useful. Okay, I think I've found the problem. When *not* using JFFS2_CMDLINE mode, U-Boot

Re: [U-Boot] Help on getting the AT91 u-boot patch

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 15:37 Fri 06 Mar , Detlef Vollmann wrote: >> John Parten wrote: >>> I am trying to build U-Boot 1.3.4 from source, for the AT91SAM9260EK >>> development board. >> I thought that 1.3.4 worked out of the box for AT91SAM9260EK. >> 2009.01 and 2009.03-r

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] CFI: geometry reversal for STMicro M29W320DT

Stefan Roese wrote: > On Friday 06 March 2009, Richard Retanubun wrote: >> Follow up to the flash_fixup_stm to fix geometry reversal >> on STMicro M29W320ET flash chip. The M29W320DT has 4 erase region. >> >> Signed-off-by: Richard Retanubun >> >> --- >> My baseline is 2009.03-rc1. If there are ST

Re: [U-Boot] Help on getting the AT91 u-boot patch

On 15:37 Fri 06 Mar , Detlef Vollmann wrote: > John Parten wrote: > > I am trying to build U-Boot 1.3.4 from source, for the AT91SAM9260EK > > development board. > I thought that 1.3.4 worked out of the box for AT91SAM9260EK. > 2009.01 and 2009.03-rc1 are broken for AT91SAM926x, but the patch

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add the "mfill" and "mcheck" memory commands.

> De : "Wolfgang Denk" > > Dear Benoit Monin, > > In message <28907262.11403.1236090567026.javamail@wwinf8303> you wrote: > > > > The mfill command writes the value of a counter to a memory area. > > The mcheck command verifies the memory area against the counter value. > > Those commands ar

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] CONFIG_PRINT_TIME: Measuring boot time.

> De : "Wolfgang Denk" > > Dear Benoit Monin, > > In message <13935170.21001.1236183410521.javamail@wwinf8202> you wrote: > > > > This option prefixes every console line with the time in seconds since > > power-up. It is inspired by the Linux kernel option PRINTK_TIME and uses > > the same o

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] CFI: geometry reversal for STMicro M29W320DT

On Friday 06 March 2009, Richard Retanubun wrote: > Follow up to the flash_fixup_stm to fix geometry reversal > on STMicro M29W320ET flash chip. The M29W320DT has 4 erase region. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Retanubun > > --- > My baseline is 2009.03-rc1. If there are STMicro/Numonyx guys on > this

[U-Boot] [PATCH] CFI: geometry reversal for STMicro M29W320DT

Follow up to the flash_fixup_stm to fix geometry reversal on STMicro M29W320ET flash chip. The M29W320DT has 4 erase region. Signed-off-by: Richard Retanubun --- My baseline is 2009.03-rc1. If there are STMicro/Numonyx guys on this mailing list, can you help provide a more 'generic' way of detec

Re: [U-Boot] Request to remove my email address from your email list

Hi, Sir,   please remove my email address from your email address, and thanks!     Best Regards, Leeming New Email names for you! Get the Email name you've always wanted on the new @ymail and @rocketmail. Hurry before someone else does! http://mail.promotions.yahoo.com/newdomains/sg/_

Re: [U-Boot] Help on getting the AT91 u-boot patch

John Parten wrote: > I am trying to build U-Boot 1.3.4 from source, for the AT91SAM9260EK > development board. I thought that 1.3.4 worked out of the box for AT91SAM9260EK. 2009.01 and 2009.03-rc1 are broken for AT91SAM926x, but the patch in

Re: [U-Boot] Help on getting the AT91 u-boot patch

On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 12:40 -0500, John Parten wrote: > Hello Mailling List, > > I am trying to build U-Boot 1.3.4 from source, for the AT91SAM9260EK > development board. > > I am following the instructions at > http://www.linux4sam.org/twiki/bin/view/Linux4SAM/U-Boot > I get to the point where

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Support for PXA27X UDC.

Hello Vivek, 2009/3/6 Vivek Kutal : > Hi Remy, >                There are around ~70 warnings generated for pxa-regs.h > for having more than 80 chars in a line, I have taken all the macro > definitions from the linux kernel source code should I fix those > warnings too ? Also pxa-regs.h already h

[U-Boot] [PATCH]OMAP3:Beagle: Enable mtdparts

http://www.denx.de/wiki/DULG/UBootCmdGroupFlash#UBootCmdFlMtdparts provides a flexible way to create and maintain u-boot mtd partitions. This allows commands such as "nand erase fs" to work and the user no longer needs to decode the absolute nand offsets. This patch enables this function for beagle

Re: [U-Boot] Bad CPU identification on MPC8544DS

On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 14:04 -0500, jeff angielski wrote: > Despite the SVR being the same (0x803c0011), the latest u-boot is > misidentifying the CPU when compared against the original 1.3.0 u-boot. > The CPU is a 8544E but u-boot is reporting 8533E. > > The wierd part of this is that according to

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Seperate mtdpart command from jffs2

Hi Kyungmin, On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Kyungmin Park wrote: > Some program such as UBI only used the mtdpart only. > however current jffs2 cmdline has dependent with jffs2 cmd > This patch make a build only jffs2 cmdline without jffs2 cmd dependency. I tried to rephrase this description a little

Re: [U-Boot] Creating partitions on NAND flash

Dear Afzal Nadirshah, In message <174230991e95d743b0c91df471ef44e8434f1c5...@mtw02msg02.mindtree.com> you wrote: > > I would like to partition the NAND flash on a canyonlands board. As per my > understanding, the partitioning is done using the "add_mtd_partitions" > function in the file "drive

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Support for PXA27X UDC.

Hi Remy, There are around ~70 warnings generated for pxa-regs.h for having more than 80 chars in a line, I have taken all the macro definitions from the linux kernel source code should I fix those warnings too ? Also pxa-regs.h already has many line with more than 80 chars. -- Than

[U-Boot] Creating partitions on NAND flash

Hi All, I would like to partition the NAND flash on a canyonlands board. As per my understanding, the partitioning is done using the "add_mtd_partitions" function in the file "drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c". I also understand that the information about a partition is stored in the structure : "struct

Re: [U-Boot] Help with TSEC on MPC8343

Hi Johnson, i'm also facing the same problem in MPC8313 board with u-boot-1.1.6. if you have any fix pleas send me Thanks Rudresh Johnson, Justin M (GE Infra, Energy) wrote: > > I ported U-Boot 1.1.6 to a custom board I am having trouble getting the > TSECs to work. I am using an MPC8343 w