Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v10] Marvell Kirkwood family SOC support

2009-05-26 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Roese [mailto:s...@denx.de] > Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 12:43 PM > To: Prafulla Wadaskar > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v10] Marvell Kirkwood family SOC support > > Hi Prafulla, > > On Thursday 21 May 2009 22:24:29 Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: > > Kirkwo

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v10] Marvell Kirkwood family SOC support

2009-05-26 Thread Stefan Roese
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 09:28:29 Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: > > Do you also have a NAND driver for Kirkwood in your queue? > > I'm asking since I need NAND support for my custom board. If > > you don't have any I will port the one from the 1.1.4 Marvell > > version to mainline. > > Hi Stefan > No need

[U-Boot] [U-BOOT] nand merge problem

2009-05-26 Thread xiangfu_gmail
Hi I have try to merge Ingenic U-boot (1.1.6) with upstream. but I have some problem 1. there is no -- NAND_CTL_SETNCE: NAND_CTL_CLRNCE: NAND_CTL_SETCLE: NAND_CTL_CLRCLE: NAND_CTL_SETALE: NAND_CTL_CLRALE: instead of : -- NAND_NCE: NAND_CLE: NAND_ALE: NAND_CTRL_CLE: NAND_CTRL_ALE: NAND_CTRL_CHANGE:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v10] Marvell Kirkwood family SOC support

2009-05-26 Thread Stefan Roese
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 09:40:49 Stefan Roese wrote: > So could you please split this Sheevaplug patch and submit the NAND driver > in a separate patch (CC to Scott Wood as NAND custodian)? I just tried including the NAND driver from this patch into drivers/mtd/nand. Seems that a few things are st

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2][Net][ppc4xx] Remove support for non-CONFIG_NET_MULTI on PPC4xx EMAC

2009-05-26 Thread Ben Warren
Hi Stefan, Ben Warren wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > Stefan Roese wrote: >> On Monday 04 May 2009, Stefan Roese wrote: >> >>> Ben, this doesn't apply against mainline. I suppose you already >>> based this >>> against your "next"? Best would be if you would apply this patch >>> directly >>> and I'll a

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3][Net][ARM] Davinci Ethernet driver cleanup

2009-05-26 Thread Ben Warren
Hello, The second spin of this patchset is identical to the first but has been re-based against u-boot/next. Since there were no technical objections with the first spin, I've applied this to the net/next branch. Please let me know if there are any problems. regards, Ben ___

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3][Net][ARM] Moved Davinci Ethernet driver to drivers/net

2009-05-26 Thread Ben Warren
This driver has been renamed dm644x_emac.c Signed-off-by: Ben Warren --- cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/Makefile |2 +- drivers/net/Makefile |1 + .../davinci/ether.c => drivers/net/dm644x_emac.c |0 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 dele

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/3][Net][ARM] Initial cleanup of Davinci Ethernet driver

2009-05-26 Thread Ben Warren
Removed pointless #ifdefs Moved functions around in file in preparation for switch to newer API Signed-off-by: Ben Warren --- drivers/net/dm644x_emac.c | 146 + 1 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/dm644x_emac

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/3][Net][ARM] Switched dm644x_emac Ethernet driver to use newer API

2009-05-26 Thread Ben Warren
Added CONFIG_NET_MULTI to all Davinci boards Removed all calls to Davinci network driver from board code Added cpu_eth_init() to cpu/arm926ejs/cpu.c Signed-off-by: Ben Warren --- board/davinci/common/misc.h |1 - board/davinci/dvevm/dvevm.c |3 - board/davinci/schmoogie/s

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2][Net][ppc4xx] Remove support for non-CONFIG_NET_MULTI on PPC4xx EMAC

2009-05-26 Thread Stefan Roese
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 10:05:12 Ben Warren wrote: > > Sorry for the delay. Yeah, please go ahead and apply 1/2 to your tree > > and ask Wolfgang to pull. The second part can be applied at any time > > - I'll take care of it. Thanks for your help. > > I've gone ahead and applied the second part t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v10] Marvell Kirkwood family SOC support

2009-05-26 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Roese [mailto:s...@denx.de] > Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 1:27 PM > To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v10] Marvell Kirkwood family SOC support > > On Tuesday 26 May 2009 09:40:49 Stefan Roese wrote: > > S

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v10] Marvell Kirkwood family SOC support

2009-05-26 Thread Stefan Roese
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 10:17:45 Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: > > I just tried including the NAND driver from this patch into > > drivers/mtd/nand. > > Seems that a few things are still missing. > > > > struct kwnandf_registersnot defined > > KW_NANDF_BASE not defined > > I hop

Re: [U-Boot] Ethernet not working on OMAP3 board with

2009-05-26 Thread Eric BENARD
Hi, Pillai, Manikandan a écrit : > Hi Dirk, > > I have already tried this patch it does not work on EVM. > Was any other patch applied along with this ? > if I understand well the datasheet, in incluse/asm/arch/cpu.h isn't base adresse for CS6's config register wrongly defined : it's actually :

Re: [U-Boot] MAC Address reading procedure in board.c

2009-05-26 Thread Drasko DRASKOVIC
Hi Wolfgang, first of all thanks a lot for your answers. On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Drasko DRASKOVIC, > > In message <5ec3d7930905250856k6cffb4ber261bd99f15868...@mail.gmail.com> > you wrote: > > > > I have been looking at MAC addr obtaining procedure in lib_arm

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v10] Marvell Kirkwood family SOC support NAND discussion

2009-05-26 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Roese [mailto:s...@denx.de] > Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 1:11 PM > To: Prafulla Wadaskar > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v10] Marvell Kirkwood family SOC support > > On Tuesday 26 May 2009 09:28:29 Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v10] Marvell Kirkwood family SOC support NAND discussion

2009-05-26 Thread Stefan Roese
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 10:48:08 Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: > > I know that NAND support is generally available in U-Boot. > > But what's currently missing is the platform/board specific > > driver for Kirkwood. Seems that you included the Kirkwood > > NAND driver into your Sheevaplug support patch. >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] bin_dep.sh Support

2009-05-26 Thread Stefan Roese
On Monday 06 April 2009 11:38:59 Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: > Bin_dep.sh provides a framework inside u-boot, > whether to use it or not is sole decision of board/processor specific code. > So why not include it :-) Since I'm currently working with a Kirkwood platform, I would like to "reactivate" t

Re: [U-Boot] [U-BOOT] nand merge problem

2009-05-26 Thread xiangfu_gmail
xiangfu_gmail wrote: > Hi > I have try to merge Ingenic U-boot (1.1.6) with upstream. > but I have some problem Hi I rewrite the jz_hwcontrol to : -- static void jz_hwcontrol(..) { .. if (ctrl & NAND_CTRL_CHANGE) { if (ctrl & NAND_NCE) R

[U-Boot] How to read and write a normal file from and to the yaffs2 in u-boot-2009.03 ?

2009-05-26 Thread zhou . yanqing
Hello all: I have a DaVinci DM6446 EVM board with 32MB K9F5608R0D(NAND Flash). The latest u-boot-2009.03 with yaffs2 compiled in can run on this board from Nand Flash. when running the command "ywr",the U-Boot dumps some error as such: U-Boot > ywr /test.txt 0 5 Writing value (0) 5 t

[U-Boot] [PATCH-ARM v2] Add support for Embest SBC2440-II Board

2009-05-26 Thread kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk
Implementation based on the existing u-boot support for S3C2410-based boards. u-boot programmed into NOR flash. Tested on an SBC2440-II Board using tftp to copy the files from a server and programming them into NAND flash. MAKEALL used to build all LIST_ARM9 targets only - no other architecture

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3][Net][ARM] Davinci Ethernet driver cleanup

2009-05-26 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Ben, I believe there was a comment regrading the name of the file. The present name is dm644x_emac.c and it should be davinci_emac.c Because other floavours of DaVinci will use the same file. IIRC in the list had the same comment. Also the patch uses "dm644x_emac_initialize" It would be better

Re: [U-Boot] Subject: [PATCH] [repost] Standardize the use of MCFFEC_TOUT_LOOP as a udelay(1) loop counter.

2009-05-26 Thread Richard Retanubun
From 584b5fbd4abfc43f920cc1c329633e03816e28be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Retanubun Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 18:26:01 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Standardize the use of MCFFEC_TOUT_LOOP as a udelay(1) loop counter. Signed-off-by: Richard Retanubun --- drivers/net/mcfmii.c |2 +- 1

Re: [U-Boot] MPC8536DS Evaluation Board Force DDR Setting cannot bedone properly

2009-05-26 Thread AgarwalAshish
As i were able to set the DDR data Via [I2C bus] SPD[Serial presence detect] table read for the custom board design i am working on ... so as for now i am not require to debug the Uboot DDR FORce setting option . though i got the clue about the DR force setting .. file: "u-boot-1.3.4\board\f

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM DaVinci: Adding new Header file

2009-05-26 Thread s-paulraj
Patch moves the device init functions to new header file devices.h. This will enable us to use the MACROS in hardware.h in the config files for the various DaVinci SOC's Signed-off-by: Sandeep Paulraj --- board/davinci/dm355evm/dm355evm.c|1 + board/davinci/dvevm/dvevm.c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH][u-boot arm/next] ARM DaVinci DM365 Support

2009-05-26 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Jean-Christophe, please see inline > -Original Message- > From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [mailto:plagn...@jcrosoft.com] > Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 8:12 PM > To: Paulraj, Sandeep > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH][u-boot arm/next] ARM DaVin

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] Gbe Controller driver support for kirkwood SOCs

2009-05-26 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Prafulla, On Thursday 21 May 2009 22:24:32 Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: > Contributors: > Yotam Admon > Michael Blostein > Reviewed by: Ronen Shitrit > Signed-off-by: Prafulla Wadaskar > --- > Change log: > v2: entire rewrite/restructure of v1 > used small names for variable/function names > re

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 06/13] Add support for the AT91RM9200EK Board.

2009-05-26 Thread Haavard Skinnemoen
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:30:19 +0100 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c b/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c > index 631b969..175d82a 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c > @@ -1788,13 +1788,10 @@ static void flash_fixup_atmel(flash

Re: [U-Boot] Ethernet not working on OMAP3 board with

2009-05-26 Thread Josh Karabin
Pillai, Manikandan wrote: > Hi Dirk, > > I have already tried this patch it does not work on EVM. > Was any other patch applied along with this ? That was the only one that I needed, on top of the arm/next branch from last week. The last commit was 86d5c98d3d97d631b1d3a5f5e6a17e87c99b42cf : "OM

Re: [U-Boot] Please help for Data TLB Error in MPC8544

2009-05-26 Thread duckycool
Hi Dave, It still shows data tlb error tho. I found it occur error around the GET_GOT of start.s. The SRR0 and SRR1 show the error address of system.map is _start_cont. Suspect the DDR setting problem ?? But I thought all the DDR setting are from SPD. So, I didn't set any entry of D

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3][Net][ARM] Davinci Ethernet driver cleanup

2009-05-26 Thread Ben Warren
Hi Sandeep, aulraj, Sandeep wrote: > Ben, > I believe there was a comment regrading the name of the file. > The present name is dm644x_emac.c and it should be davinci_emac.c > Because other floavours of DaVinci will use the same file. > > IIRC in the list had the same comment. > Also the patch

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] avr32: unified u-boot.lds

2009-05-26 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, In message <1243075795-20760-1-git-send-email-plagn...@jcrosoft.com> you wrote: > all avr32 boards use the same cpu lds so move it to cpu/$(CPU) > > that could be overwrite in following order > SOC > BOARD > via the corresponding config.mk Please update the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/7] mx27: basic cpu support

2009-05-26 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, In message <20090523002250.ga20...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote: > > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/include/asm-arm/arch-mx27/asm-offsets.h > please add GPL header and copyright For this file this makes not much sense. This file will be auto-generated from other

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC/PATCH] jffs2/mtdparts: Fix problem with usage from JFFS2 and MTDPARTS together

2009-05-26 Thread Scott Wood
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:10:24PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > I get this: > > => nand read 20 0 100 > > NAND read: device 0 offset 0x0, size 0x100 > NAND read from offset 0 failed -74 >16777216 bytes read: ERROR > > Hm, this is indeed a very helpful messa

Re: [U-Boot] Auto-booting problem

2009-05-26 Thread Scott Wood
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 10:35:28AM +0530, Vijay Nikam wrote: > Yes, then you need to set/use CONFIG_BOOTDELAY to enable or disable > for autoboot. For details and information have a look at > doc/README.autoboot > > Once you use CONFIG_BOOTDELAY, then recompile and generate u-boot.bin, > if everyt

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4] Support NAND and OneNAND memories on the OMAP3 EVM

2009-05-26 Thread Josh Karabin
This patch series permits the OMAP3 EVM to select which set of NAND or OneNAND memory related commands to use, as a function of the detected bootstrap configuration. In addition to the OMAP3-specific parts, it abstracts the selection of the environment's location so that the choice can be made at

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] Support multiple CONFIG_ENV options in a single build.

2009-05-26 Thread Josh Karabin
If only a single CONFIG_ENV constant is defined at build time, the location of the environment will correspond to that environment. If multiple CONFIG_ENV constants are defined at build time, the environment will default to one of the locations, but the particular location is not defined. Mechani

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] Support run-time disabling of NAND and OneNAND memories.

2009-05-26 Thread Josh Karabin
Add "disable" functions that will prevent the initialization function of nand and onenand interfaces from completing. These functions are intended to be called on boards that can be populated with one of multiple persistent memory types. Board initialization code must ensure that only the correct

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] Support run-time disabling of u-boot commands.

2009-05-26 Thread Josh Karabin
Change the command parsing code to ignore command table entries with NULL names. This makes it possible to disable a command (say, for a supported but not connected memory) at run time. Signed-off-by: Josh Karabin --- common/command.c | 43 +-- 1 files

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] Support NAND and OneNAND memories on the OMAP3 EVM.

2009-05-26 Thread Josh Karabin
This change detects the boot configuration of an OMAP3 device, and uses that information on OMAP3 EVM builds to support NAND or OneNAND. Signed-off-by: Josh Karabin --- board/omap3/evm/evm.c | 24 +++ board/omap3/evm/evm.h |4 +- cpu/arm_cortexa8/o

Re: [U-Boot] Axiom MCF5282 help

2009-05-26 Thread TC Liew
Mark, There could be a hardware issue. Is the phy crystal on the board is F25.00 or F25.00P? Regards, TsiChung On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Mark Giacobbe wrote: > Hi All - > >    I'm new to u-boot and I am running into some issues.  I an using the > Axiom 5282lite board and I cannot get the

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] initcall mechanism introduction

2009-05-26 Thread Scott Wood
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 04:57:25PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > I think you don't understand the complexity yet. One problem we have > to solve is to make sure we have a very specific sequence in which > the init routines are run. The original idea of the code was that you > can #define the in

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] Support multiple CONFIG_ENV options in a single build.

2009-05-26 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Josh Karabin, In message <720c2e565183a38bc9ecc6b880373534b1826a8b.1243367498.git.gkarabi n...@vocollect.com> you wrote: > If only a single CONFIG_ENV constant is defined at build time, > the location of the environment will correspond to that > environment. > > If multiple CONFIG_ENV const

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] Support run-time disabling of NAND and OneNAND memories.

2009-05-26 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Josh Karabin, In message <6fef2a52802b16a737007f722b084fda737664f8.1243367498.git.gkarabi n...@vocollect.com> you wrote: > Add "disable" functions that will prevent the initialization > function of nand and onenand interfaces from completing. > > These functions are intended to be called on

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] Support run-time disabling of u-boot commands.

2009-05-26 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Josh Karabin, In message <2d0c4b7840d573c666484662662fbb953f59cfba.1243367498.git.gkarabi n...@vocollect.com> you wrote: > Change the command parsing code to ignore command table > entries with NULL names. This makes it possible to disable a > command (say, for a supported but not connected

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] Support NAND and OneNAND memories on the OMAP3 EVM.

2009-05-26 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Josh Karabin, In message you wrote: > This change detects the boot configuration of an OMAP3 device, > and uses that information on OMAP3 EVM builds to support > NAND or OneNAND. > > Signed-off-by: Josh Karabin > --- > board/omap3/evm/evm.c | 24 +++ > board/oma

Re: [U-Boot] [U-BOOT] nand merge problem

2009-05-26 Thread Scott Wood
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 05:12:01PM +0800, xiangfu_gmail wrote: > xiangfu_gmail wrote: > > Hi > > I have try to merge Ingenic U-boot (1.1.6) with upstream. > > but I have some problem > Hi I rewrite the jz_hwcontrol to : > -- > static void jz_hwcontrol(..) > { .. > if (ctrl & NAND_

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v10] Marvell Kirkwood family SOC support NAND discussion

2009-05-26 Thread Scott Wood
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 01:48:08AM -0700, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: > Good Feedback... > The name board_nand_init() is confusing here Why the board specific code > is in drivers/mtd/nand/? > Whereas I can see more references in board/* > But looking other code references in this folder your fee

Re: [U-Boot] Axiom MCF5282 help

2009-05-26 Thread Mark Giacobbe
Thanks, the crystal (Y2) is FS25.00. What should it be? I'm thinking it may be a hardware issue also, because uClinux is doing the same thing. Mark TC Liew wrote: > Mark, > > There could be a hardware issue. Is the phy crystal on the board is > F25.00 or F25.00P? > > Regards, > TsiChung > > On

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] initcall mechanism introduction

2009-05-26 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Scott, in message <20090526210046.ga4...@b07421-ec1.am.freescale.net> you wrote: > > IMHO, it is much better for the information on what needs to be run on > init to reside in the file that needs to be called, rather than copied to > a bunch of different arch files. Then you might end up wi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v10] Marvell Kirkwood family SOC support NAND discussion

2009-05-26 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 16:30 Tue 26 May , Scott Wood wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 01:48:08AM -0700, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: > > Good Feedback... > > The name board_nand_init() is confusing here Why the board specific > > code is in drivers/mtd/nand/? > > Whereas I can see more references in board/* > > B

Re: [U-Boot] Ethernet not working on OMAP3 board with

2009-05-26 Thread Eric BENARD
Eric BENARD a écrit : > if I understand well the datasheet, in incluse/asm/arch/cpu.h > isn't base adresse for CS6's config register wrongly defined : sorry after reading again I now understand this value is calculated, the defined value is of course the right. Eric _

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] initcall mechanism introduction

2009-05-26 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 23:54 Tue 26 May , Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Scott, > > in message <20090526210046.ga4...@b07421-ec1.am.freescale.net> you wrote: > > > > IMHO, it is much better for the information on what needs to be run on > > init to reside in the file that needs to be called, rather than copied to >

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] initcall mechanism introduction

2009-05-26 Thread Scott Wood
Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Scott, > > in message <20090526210046.ga4...@b07421-ec1.am.freescale.net> you wrote: >> IMHO, it is much better for the information on what needs to be run on >> init to reside in the file that needs to be called, rather than copied to >> a bunch of different arch files

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] initcall mechanism introduction

2009-05-26 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, In message <20090526220736.gb30...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote: > > > Boards are different... see for example "lib_ppc/board.c" - on some > > boards (BAB7xx and CPC45) we must initialize PCI early, while on some > > others we cannot initialize it that early.

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] initcall mechanism introduction

2009-05-26 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Scott Wood, In message <4a1c6b48.9050...@freescale.com> you wrote: > > I assume he meant that the image size was smaller, due to replacing > explicit function calls with a table-driven approach. We already have such a functionpoointer table - problem is that we don't use it everywhere, usua

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] 83xx: Replace CONFIG_MPC83XX with CONFIG_MPC83xx

2009-05-26 Thread Kim Phillips
On Sun, 24 May 2009 22:13:27 +0200 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Peter, > > In message <1243192952.703.7.ca...@ptyser-laptop> you wrote: > > > > > CodingStyle Ch.12 suggests that it's the other fsl arches that are in > > > violation here, not 83XX: > > Agreed... > > > Either way is fine with me,

Re: [U-Boot] [U-BOOT] nand merge problem

2009-05-26 Thread xiangfu_gmail
Hi Scott thanks for the reply Scott Wood wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 05:12:01PM +0800, xiangfu_gmail wrote: >> xiangfu_gmail wrote: >>> Hi >>> I have try to merge Ingenic U-boot (1.1.6) with upstream. >>> but I have some problem >> Hi I rewrite the jz_hwcontrol to : >> -- >> static void jz_hw

Re: [U-Boot] Axiom MCF5282 help

2009-05-26 Thread Mark Giacobbe
Thanks It's the FS25.00. Is this correct? Thanks Mark TC Liew wrote: > Mark, > > There could be a hardware issue. Is the phy crystal on the board is > F25.00 or F25.00P? > > Regards, > TsiChung > > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Mark Giacobbe > wrote: > >> Hi All - >> >>I'm new to u-b

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/11] 85xx/86xx dma updates

2009-05-26 Thread Timur Tabi
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Ira Snyder wrote: > I've been doing some Linux work with the 83xx DMA controller. The only > real differences between the 83xx/85xx controller are the register > endianness and snoop bits. The 83xx controller's registers are all > little-endian, while the 85xx is

Re: [U-Boot] Ethernet not working on OMAP3 board with

2009-05-26 Thread Pillai, Manikandan
OK I will try with the same commit and send the results. > -Original Message- > From: Josh Karabin [mailto:gkara...@vocollect.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 8:26 PM > To: Pillai, Manikandan > Cc: Dirk Behme; u-boot@lists.denx.de > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Ethernet not working on OMAP3 bo

Re: [U-Boot] Support in u-boot for PCI-Express NIC

2009-05-26 Thread Zang Roy-R61911
> -Original Message- > From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de > [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Denk > Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 4:06 AM > To: Srinivasan Srikanth-R9AABP > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Support in u-boot for PCI-Express NIC >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] Gbe Controller driver support for kirkwood SOCs

2009-05-26 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
Thanks a lot Stefan for your review feedback... You are thinking more similar to Linux Implementation :-) I will try to address your suggestions, it provides more flexibility and readability. On the other hand I am currently putting my efforts to reduce patch size cutting some features. I will d

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/2] sh: make lds more generic

2009-05-26 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
2009/5/14 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD : > currently the sh lds need to sync the lds enty and TEXT_BASE manualy > and the reloc_dst is based on it > > instead provide it now from the ldflags > > tested on r2dplus > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > Cc: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu App

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/2] sh: make lds more generic

2009-05-26 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Nobuhiro Iwamatsu, In message <29ab51dc0905262313h17934f09u904a4e7325207...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > 2009/5/14 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD : > > currently the sh lds need to sync the lds enty and TEXT_BASE manualy > > and the reloc_dst is based on it > > > > instead provide it now f