P1020 is another member of QorIQ series of processors which falls in ULE
category. It is an e500 based dual core SOC.
Being a scaled down version of P2020 it has following differences from P2020:
- 533MHz - 800MHz core frequency.
- 256Kbyte L2 cache
- Ethernet controllers with classification capabi
The number of CPUs are getting detected dynamically by checking the processor
SVR value.
Also removed CONFIG_NUM_CPUS references from all the platforms with 85xx/86xx
processors.
This can help to use the same u-boot image across the platforms.
Also revamped and corrected few Freescale Copyright m
Removed same code pieces from cpu/mpc85xx/cpu.c and cpu/mpc86xx/cpu.c
and moved to cpu/mpc8xxx/cpu.c(new file)
Signed-off-by: Poonam Aggrwal
---
- based of u-boot version 2009.08-rc1
- Changes over v1:
Incorporated Wolfgang's comments
Makefile |2 +
cpu/mpc85xx/cpu.c| 70
Dear Sir or Madam:：
I have some questinos and need your help.
I’m porting S3C4510B and using ADS1.2 (AXD debugger with Multi-ICE) to
debug u-boot elf file. I use windows XP platform and compile with Linux
platform. The u-boot version is 1.1.6 and cross compilation version 3.3.2
for ARM.
After
On Thu 30 Jul 2009 15:55, Wolfgang Denk pondered:
> Dear Robin Getz,
>
> In message <200907301550.40651.rg...@blackfin.uclinux.org> you wrote:
> >
> > I assume - no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover
> > Texts? or did you desire something else?
>
> We don't have such det
On Thu 30 Jul 2009 05:02, Alessandro Rubini pondered:
> The defragmenting code is enabled by CONFIG_IP_DEFRAG. The code
> is useful for TFTP transfers, so the static reassembly buffer is sized
> based on CONFIG_TFTP_MAXBLOCK (default is 16kB).
>
> The packet buffer is used as an array of "hole" st
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message <6ace562a-deb9-4e6c-b357-1a0d208b0...@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote:
>
> >> + CPU_TYPE_ENTRY(8569, 8569),
> >> + CPU_TYPE_ENTRY(8569, 8569_E),
> >> + CPU_TYPE_ENTRY(8572, 8572),
> >> + CPU_TYPE_ENTRY(8572, 8572_E),
> >> + CPU_TYPE_ENTRY(P2020, P2020),
> >> + CPU
Fix a typo in the GCDR(x) macro. It's a good thing no one was using it.
Signed-off-by: David Hunter
---
include/asm-arm/arch-pxa/pxa-regs.h |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-arm/arch-pxa/pxa-regs.h
b/include/asm-arm/arch-pxa/pxa-regs.h
index 2
On Jul 30, 2009, at 1:32 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> +CPU_TYPE_ENTRY(8569, 8569),
>> +CPU_TYPE_ENTRY(8569, 8569_E),
>> +CPU_TYPE_ENTRY(8572, 8572),
>> +CPU_TYPE_ENTRY(8572, 8572_E),
>> +CPU_TYPE_ENTRY(P2020, P2020),
>> +CPU_TYPE_ENTRY(P2020, P2020_E),
>> +#elif defined(CON
Dear Robin Getz,
In message <200907301550.40651.rg...@blackfin.uclinux.org> you wrote:
>
> I assume - no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover
> Texts? or did you desire something else?
We don't have such detailed plans yet. I see no need for Invariant
Sections.
> Since Fr
On Thu 30 Jul 2009 14:45, Wolfgang DenkVersion 1.3 pondered:
> Hi,
>
> In message Detlev Zundel wrote:
> ...
> > > Not meaning to interpret licensing, but to me that means I
> > > can't copy/paste sections into end product documentation, and ship
> > > the product for a fee...
> >
> > That's h
> >
> > I'll prefer we find a way to not put soc specific code in the generic code
> > maybe we can crete a header which will be soc specific or a generic that we
> > will include depending on the soc
>
> something like weak alias?
>
> The new problem is now I want to support S5PC100 & S5PC110 Sa
CPUAT91 is built around Atmel's AT91RM9200 and has up to 16MB of NOR
flash, up to 128MB of SDRAM, and includes a Micrel KS8721 PHY in RMII
mode.
v3 : fix coding style issues
v4 : fix coding style in ks8721
Signed-off-by: Eric Benard
---
MAINTAINERS |4 +
MAKEALL
Dear Vivek,
In message you wrote:
> Removed code referring Legacy NAND and did some code cleanup.
Such version comments should go below the --- line, not above.
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Dalal
> ---
Consider using git-format-patch to create the patches.
MAINAINERS entry is missing.
MAKEALL ent
Penda, Naveen Kumar wrote:
> From: Penda Naveen Kumar
>
> This patch provides bug fix, when omap3 uses nor boot.
>
> Signed-off-by: Penda Naveen Kumar
Makes sense! Most probably not found earlier because most OMAP3 boards
have no NOR.
Acked-by: Dirk Behme
> Index: u-boot/cpu/arm_cortexa8/om
Hi,
In message Detlev Zundel wrote:
...
> > Not meaning to interpret licensing, but to me that means I can't copy/paste
> > sections into end product documentation, and ship the product for a fee...
>
> That's how it is currently, yes.
>
> > Was that the intent?
>
> Not really - but I'll bett
Hi everybody,
In message <1248813339-16796-1-git-send-email...@denx.de> you wrote:
> Remove bogus newline character that got added to the .name field of
> the disk_partition_t structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk
> ---
> disk/part_dos.c | 15 ++-
> disk/part_efi.c |2 +-
Dear Poonam Aggrwal,
In message <1248832996-560-1-git-send-email-poonam.aggr...@freescale.com> you
wrote:
> The number of CPUs are getting detected dynamically by checking the processor
> SVR value.
> Also removed CONFIG_NUM_CPUS references from all the platforms with 85xx/86xx
> processors.
>
>
From: Penda Naveen Kumar
This patch provides bug fix, when omap3 uses nor boot.
Signed-off-by: Penda Naveen Kumar
Index: u-boot/cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/lowlevel_init.S
===
--- u-boot.orig/cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/lowlevel_init.S
+++ u
Dear Poonam Aggrwal,
In message <1248832972-515-1-git-send-email-poonam.aggr...@freescale.com> you
wrote:
> Removed same code pieces from cpu/mpc85xx/cpu.c and cpu/mpc86xx/cpu.c
> and moved to cpu/mpc8xxx/cpu.c(new file)
...
> diff --git a/cpu/mpc8xxx/cpu.c b/cpu/mpc8xxx/cpu.c
> new file mode 10
Dear Poonam Aggrwal,
In message <1248963409-27098-1-git-send-email-poonam.aggr...@freescale.com> you
wrote:
> P1020 is another member of QorIQ series of processors which falls in ULE
> category.
> It is a scaled down version of P2020 with following differences from P2020:
> - 533MHz - 800MHz core
Hi,
> In spite of what I wrote earlier - the whole 'configuration' stuff
> pivots on config/configs.tcl. In here we have configuration
> descriptions. The _default must be first and initializes all "slots"
> which can be overriden in subsequent duts_configs.
>
> So If you want to only swap in yo
Hi Niklaus,
> Thanks for your quick answer and I got a few steps further.
Excellent.
> First I created my own version of "connect" (see attached Ruby script).
>
> Now at least I can connect and it seems to work.
Right - if you only reimplement the methods that we use locally then you
should not
Hi Tuma,
> Hello All!
Hiya.
> I develop some "upgrade" tool based on the U-Boot booted from SD card.
> I want to boot from SD card, and execute some simple script which is stored
> in
> bootcmd environment variable:
> "echo Hello! ; mmcinit ; sleep 10 ; reset; " etc...
> So I need to generate
P1020 is another member of QorIQ series of processors which falls in ULE
category.
It is a scaled down version of P2020 with following differences from P2020:
- 533MHz - 800MHz core frequency.
- 256Kbyte L2 cache
- Ethernet controllers with classification capabilities.
Also the SOC is pin compatibl
Hello Kumar
If the patch is fine could you please pick it.
Regards
Poonam
> -Original Message-
> From: Aggrwal Poonam-B10812
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 7:33 AM
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: Aggrwal Poonam-B10812
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2]Removed CONFIG_NUM_CPUS for 85xx/86xx
> Fr
Hello Kumar
If the patch is fine, could you please pick it up.
Many Thanks
Poonam
> -Original Message-
> From: Aggrwal Poonam-B10812
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 7:33 AM
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: Aggrwal Poonam-B10812
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2]Refactored common cpu specific code
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:50:47 +0530 wrote
>Hello GurumurthyGowdar,
>
>GurumurthyGowdar wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:14:30 +0530 wrote
>>> Hello GurumurthyGowdar,
>>>
>>> GurumurthyGowdar wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:54:31 +0530 wrote
> Hello GurumurthyGowdar,
>
> Gurumurth
Dear Stefan Roese,
In message <200907301418.20027...@denx.de> you wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> please pull those 4xx updates/fixes, which I would really like to see
> in the upcoming release.
>
> Thanks.
>
> The following changes since commit 108f56b056780f0d23f720d98709304f84a0d6c8:
> Wolfgang
Hi Detlev and Wolfgang
Thanks for your quick answer and I got a few steps further.
First I created my own version of "connect" (see attached Ruby script).
Now at least I can connect and it seems to work.
Am Donnerstag 30 Juli 2009 12.14:14 schrieb Detlev Zundel:
> Hi Niklaus,
<..>
> > I would a
GurumurthyGowdar wrote:
>
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:14:30 +0530 wrote
>> Hello GurumurthyGowdar,
[snip]
> i got one new error which is below :-
> U-Boot 1.3.1 (Jul 27 2009 - 17:27:10)
>
> MPC8260 Reset Status: Check Stop, External Soft, External Hard
>
> MPC8260 Clock Configuration
> - Bus-t
Hi all,
My MPC8541 board has 4 ethernet ports, 2 TSEC's e 2 FCC's. Each one is
connected to a PHY, and all PHY's are connected to the MDIO bus.
For TSEC's, PHY address is defined with:
#define TSEC1_PHY_ADDR 4
#define TSEC1_PHY_ADDR 2
But I didn't find where to set FCC PHY add
Hi Wolfgang,
please pull those 4xx updates/fixes, which I would really like to see
in the upcoming release.
Thanks.
The following changes since commit 108f56b056780f0d23f720d98709304f84a0d6c8:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-i2c
are available in th
On Thursday 30 July 2009 09:36:33 Dirk Eibach wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Dirk Eibach
Applied to u-boot-ppc4xx/master. Thanks.
Best regards,
Stefan
=
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235
On Thursday 30 July 2009 07:22:48 Stefan Roese wrote:
> This patch changes CONFIG_SYS_BOOTMAPSZ from 8MB to 16MB which is the
> initial TLB on 40x PPC's in the Linux kernel. With this change even bigger
> Linux kernels (> 8MB) can be booted.
>
> This patch also sets CONFIG_SYS_BOOTM_LEN to 16MB (de
On Wednesday 29 July 2009 16:26:11 Stefan Roese wrote:
> This patch is based on a diff created by Phong Vo from AMCC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Phong Vo
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese
Applied to u-boot-ppc4xx/master. Thanks.
Best regards,
Stefan
On Wednesday 29 July 2009 16:26:03 Stefan Roese wrote:
> This patch is based on a diff created by Phong Vo from AMCC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Phong Vo
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese
Applied to u-boot-ppc4xx/master. Thanks.
Best regards,
Stefan
On Wednesday 29 July 2009 16:25:54 Stefan Roese wrote:
> Some Canyonlands boards are equipped with different SODIMM's. This is no
> problem with the "normal" NOR booting Canyonlands U-Boot, since it
> automatically detects the SODIMM's via SPD data and correctly configures
> them. But the NAND boot
On Wednesday 29 July 2009 16:25:34 Stefan Roese wrote:
> This patch moves the load addresses for kernel, fdt and ramdisk to higher
> addresses (>= 16MB). This enables booting of bigger kernel images (e.g.
> lockdep enabled).
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese
Applied to u-boot-ppc4xx/master. Thanks.
hello heiko,
sorry this is our custom board. not the mainline board.
Regards,
Gurumurthy___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Hello GurumurthyGowdar,
GurumurthyGowdar wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:14:30 +0530 wrote
>> Hello GurumurthyGowdar,
>>
>> GurumurthyGowdar wrote:
>>> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:54:31 +0530 wrote
Hello GurumurthyGowdar,
GurumurthyGowdar wrote:
> i am using MPC8280 in our board wh
Test Message.
--
Software Developer
General Satellite Corp.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Hello All!
I develop some "upgrade" tool based on the U-Boot booted from SD card.
I want to boot from SD card, and execute some simple script which is stored in
bootcmd environment variable:
"echo Hello! ; mmcinit ; sleep 10 ; reset; " etc...
So I need to generate some environment file. I find sou
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:14:30 +0530 wrote
>Hello GurumurthyGowdar,
>
>GurumurthyGowdar wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:54:31 +0530 wrote
>>> Hello GurumurthyGowdar,
>>>
>>> GurumurthyGowdar wrote:
i am using MPC8280 in our board which has 512MB of SDRAM i.e. from micron.
>>> Is this board
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:14:30 +0530 wrote
>Hello GurumurthyGowdar,
>
>GurumurthyGowdar wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:54:31 +0530 wrote
>>> Hello GurumurthyGowdar,
>>>
>>> GurumurthyGowdar wrote:
i am using MPC8280 in our board which has 512MB of SDRAM i.e. from micron.
>>> Is this board
Hi Michael,
In the latest version, mmc is implemented in driver/mmc.
If 6410 is not supported in current uboot, then what you need to do is:
1). Add hardware init code, like iomux and clock in your board init
files.
2). Add host operation code. Maybe you can refe
Hello GurumurthyGowdar,
GurumurthyGowdar wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:54:31 +0530 wrote
>> Hello GurumurthyGowdar,
>>
>> GurumurthyGowdar wrote:
>>> i am using MPC8280 in our board which has 512MB of SDRAM i.e. from micron.
>> Is this board in mainline, so I can look in the Source Code?
> yes
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:19:13 +0530 wrote
>
>
>On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:41:13 +0530 wrote
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:54:31 +0530 wrote
>>>Hello GurumurthyGowdar,
>>>
>>>GurumurthyGowdar wrote:
i am using MPC8280 in our board which has 512MB of SDRAM i.e. from micron.
>>>
>>>Is this
Hi Niklaus,
> I would like to do some more extensive tests with the U-boot and took a look
> at http://www.denx.de/wiki/DUTS/DUTSDocs
Oh, this is most welcome.
> I think that the wiki is somehow out of date as examples as the following
> a) ./duts b should be rewritten to /duts -showconfig ?
>
Hi Robin,
> On Tue 28 Jul 2009 17:27, Wolfgang Denk pondered:
>> Dear John,
>>
>> in message <1248813631.3915.102.ca...@johns> you wrote:
>> >
>> > It seems to me that DUTS is designed to test U-Boot and also automates
>> > the running of commands whose output can be put online in the DULG. I
>>
I'm trying to setup a new u-boot on an old STx AMC8548 board. I discovered the
reason for instability I reported earlier, namely DDR's twoT_en option was not
set. However, now I have a different problem.
Attempt to access the network always fails with "Got error 4" message. I can
see ARP reque
Hi Wolfgang,
> Dear Axel Beierlein,
>
> In message <1248471861-8085-1-git-send-email-beierl...@goetting.de> you wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Axel Beierlein
>> ---
>> Makefile|7 +++
>> board/tqc/tqm5200/tqm5200.c |9 -
>> include/configs/TQM5200.h | 33 +++
Raising the block size is useful if CONFIG_IP_DEFRAG is
used. Howerver, the last fragments in a burst may overflow the
receiving ethernet, so the default is left at 1468, with thre new
CONFIG_TFTP_BLOCKSIZE for config files. Further, "tftpblocksize"
can be set in the environment.
Signed-off-by: Al
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini
---
include/configs/nhk8815.h |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/nhk8815.h b/include/configs/nhk8815.h
index bfa91a2..fd6d7d1 100644
--- a/include/configs/nhk8815.h
+++ b/include/configs/nhk8815.h
@@ -147,6 +
Raising the block size is useful if CONFIG_IP_DEFRAG is
used. Howerver, the last fragments in a burst may overflow the
receiving ethernet, so the default is left at 1468, with thre new
CONFIG_TFTP_BLOCKSIZE for config files. Further, "tftpblocksize"
can be set in the environment.
Signed-off-by: Al
The defragmenting code is enabled by CONFIG_IP_DEFRAG. The code
is useful for TFTP transfers, so the static reassembly buffer is sized
based on CONFIG_TFTP_MAXBLOCK (default is 16kB).
The packet buffer is used as an array of "hole" structures, acting as
a double-linked list. Each new fragment can
This patch-set implements the defragment code. PAtch 3 is just for me,
to enable it. It may also be a good thing to have, so people can look
for actual users and find one. If needed, I'll add another patch for
documentation.
I've done as RFC815 says although an unlikely insane fragment is not ha
Signed-off-by: Dirk Eibach
---
board/gdsys/compactcenter/compactcenter.c | 26 +-
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/gdsys/compactcenter/compactcenter.c
b/board/gdsys/compactcenter/compactcenter.c
index 477ef70..f448ef9 100644
--- a/bo
Hello GurumurthyGowdar,
GurumurthyGowdar wrote:
> i am using MPC8280 in our board which has 512MB of SDRAM i.e. from micron.
Is this board in mainline, so I can look in the Source Code?
Which u-boot version?
Which SDRAMs?
> when i give command mtest only for 1MB to check memory test from U-boot
Hi Dirk,
On Thursday 30 July 2009 08:46:16 Dirk Eibach wrote:
> This patch is based on a patch for canyonlands by Stefan Roese.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dirk Eibach
> ---
> board/gdsys/compactcenter/compactcenter.c | 16
> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff -
Dear Niklaus,
In message <200907300832.15979.niklaus.gi...@member.fsf.org> you wrote:
>
> I would like to do some more extensive tests with the U-boot and took a look
> at http://www.denx.de/wiki/DUTS/DUTSDocs
>
> I think that the wiki is somehow out of date as examples as the following
> a) ./
61 matches
Mail list logo
