Scott Wood a écrit :
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 05:18:40PM +0200, Eric Benard wrote:
Signed-off-by: Eric Benard e...@eukrea.com
---
drivers/nand/nand_imx.c | 20 +---
include/asm-arm/arch-imx/imx-nand.h |3 ++-
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
index dd0b761..6d18e7f 100755
--- a/MAKEALL
+++ b/MAKEALL
@@ -595,11 +595,12 @@ LIST_at91= \
at91sam9260ek \
at91sam9261ek \
at91sam9263ek \
- at91sam9g10ek \
+ at91sam9g10ek \
again please do this in
On 00:06 Fri 31 Jul , Penda, Naveen Kumar wrote:
From: Penda Naveen Kumarpnav...@ti.com
This patch provides bug fix, when omap3 uses nor boot.
Signed-off-by: Penda Naveen Kumarpnav...@ti.com
please specify on which board you test it
Best Regards,
J.
On 17:40 Fri 31 Jul , J.C. Wren wrote:
I enabled CONFIG_YAFFS2 for ARM, and got the following message:
/home/user/u-boot/fs/yaffs2/yaffscfg.c:185: undefined reference to
`__udivdi3'
just use lldiv
Best Regards,
J.
___
U-Boot mailing list
On 14:32 Thu 30 Jul , David Hunter wrote:
Fix a typo in the GCDR(x) macro. It's a good thing no one was using it.
Signed-off-by: David Hunter hunter...@gmail.com
---
include/asm-arm/arch-pxa/pxa-regs.h |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
applied to u-boot-arm
On 10:32 Fri 24 Jul , Albin Tonnerre wrote:
The Calao TNY-A9260 and TNY-9G20 are boards manufactured and sold by Calao
Systems http://www.calao-systems.com. Their components are very
similar to the AT91SAM9260EK board, so their configuration is based on
the configuration of this board.
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
In message 20090801132619.ga19...@game.jcrosoft.org you wrote:
On 17:40 Fri 31 Jul , J.C. Wren wrote:
I enabled CONFIG_YAFFS2 for ARM, and got the following message:
/home/user/u-boot/fs/yaffs2/yaffscfg.c:185: undefined reference to
`__udivdi3'
Hi Jean-Christophe,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD a écrit :
+cpuat91_ram_config \
+cpuat91_config : unconfig
+@mkdir -p $(obj)include
+@if [ $(findstring _ram_,$@) ] ; then \
+echo #define CONFIG_CPUAT91_RAM 1 $(obj)include/config.h ; \
NACK
no new config
On 16:40 Sat 01 Aug , Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
In message 20090801132619.ga19...@game.jcrosoft.org you wrote:
On 17:40 Fri 31 Jul , J.C. Wren wrote:
I enabled CONFIG_YAFFS2 for ARM, and got the following message:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Jean-Christophe
PLAGNIOL-VILLARDplagn...@jcrosoft.com wrote:
applied to u-boot-arm
That raises a question. I'm porting U-Boot to our Marvell PXA310-based
hardware. (I'm very new to contributing to an open source project
using git, so I apologize in advance for
On 12:15 Sat 01 Aug , David Hunter wrote:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Jean-Christophe
PLAGNIOL-VILLARDplagn...@jcrosoft.com wrote:
applied to u-boot-arm
That raises a question. I'm porting U-Boot to our Marvell PXA310-based
hardware. (I'm very new to contributing to an open
I thought the idea was to move u-boot away from libgcc dependencies. Or did
I misread that? I know that a previous problem I commented on was solved by
adding a __x.S function the u-boot library.
--jc
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Jean-Christophe
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
In message 20090801161409.gd19...@game.jcrosoft.org you wrote:
I enabled CONFIG_YAFFS2 for ARM, and got the following message:
/home/user/u-boot/fs/yaffs2/yaffscfg.c:185: undefined reference to
`__udivdi3'
just use lldiv
The big question
Dear J.C. Wren,
In message 17434f2e0908011243y666d2d40if6fdfd8a5c00c...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
I thought the idea was to move u-boot away from libgcc dependencies. Or did
I misread that? I know that a previous problem I commented on was solved by
adding a __x.S function the u-boot
Dear David Hunter,
In message d47469d30908011215k51f1ff58j47892a3e86c40...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
That raises a question. I'm porting U-Boot to our Marvell PXA310-based
hardware. (I'm very new to contributing to an open source project
using git, so I apologize in advance for the mistakes
On 17:40 Fri 31 Jul , Albin Tonnerre wrote:
Hi Wolfgang and Jean-Christophe,
Is this patch being left aside on purpose, or did it get under the radar ? I
think it would be nice to have that fixed for the next release.
I've not missed it but here each board Maintainer must ack it
as the
16 matches
Mail list logo