Le 24/08/2010 07:21, Chris Moore a écrit :
Hi Rogan,
Le 23/08/2010 18:06, Rogan Dawes a écrit :
Doubling the value for ORION5X_SZ_BOOTROM allowed me to access the
additional sectors, but that makes me wonder what the reason for it is.
I know that the flash chip is wired up strangely, but
On Monday 23 August 2010 06:31:26 pm Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday, August 23, 2010 09:12:16 David Jander wrote:
+ {
+ .idcode1 = SPSN_ID_S25FL032A,
+ .idcode2 = SPSN_EXT_ID_S25FL032P,
+ .idmask2 = 0xff00,
what does the idcode2 look like such that you
This patch introduces an extra mask-field in spansion_spi_flash_params
to support flash chips with 1-byte extended ID (like the S25FL032P).
Signed-off-by: David Jander da...@protonic.nl
---
drivers/mtd/spi/spansion.c | 19 ++-
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Richard,
The QSPI driver can be found in MCF5329 LTIB.
Regards,
TC
On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 16:33 -0400, Richard Retanubun wrote:
Hi TC,
I am looking to use the QSPI for MCF5270 and noticed that the cf_spi driver
only stubs this part.
Any chance there are CF_QSPI driver code written
On 2010/08/24 8:07 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Le 24/08/2010 07:21, Chris Moore a écrit :
Hi Rogan,
Le 23/08/2010 18:06, Rogan Dawes a écrit :
Doubling the value for ORION5X_SZ_BOOTROM allowed me to access the
additional sectors, but that makes me wonder what the reason for it is.
I know
New line is unnecessary at last line of macro.
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang mk7.k...@samsung.com
---
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-s5pc1xx/cpu.h |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-s5pc1xx/cpu.h
b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-s5pc1xx/cpu.h
LinkedIn
yefeng fan requested to add you as a connection on LinkedIn:
--
Srinath,
I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
- yefeng
Accept invitation from yefeng fan
Because of peripheral devices can select clock sources,
separate the peripheral clocks. (pwm, uart and so on)
It just return the pclk at s5pc1xx SoC,
but s5pc210 SoC must be calculated by own clock register setting.
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang mk7.k...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
Dear Mike Frysinger,
were you going to send an updated version ?
Soon. Currently I have other issues and a rather
dirty working tree :)
Reinhard
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
hi,all:
I want to use i.MX51 base board to booting u-boot from nand flash,how can
I do?
thanks
best regards
shulin
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Dear sandeep suresh,
Dear Reinhard Meyer,
Appreciate your quick response. I had done this earlier
before posting this mail, but with the same problem:
step 1) export PATH=$PATH:/work/arm/4.3.2/bin
step 2) make distclean
step 3) make AT91SAM9260ek_config
step 4)make
Can you please help me
Hi,
I am using mx51 base board, I want to make u-boot booting from nand flash.
Does anyone knows how to modify the u-boot source?
Does add some code to init the nand flash controller in flash_header.S's dcd
section?
Does anyone have u-boot booting from NAND on mx51? Any repository, or a
patch
Hi,
I am using mx51 base board, I want to make u-boot booting from nand flash.
Does anyone knows how to modify the u-boot source?
Does add some code to init the nand flash controller in
flash_header.S's dcd section?
Does anyone have u-boot booting from NAND on mx51? Any repository, or a
patch
Dear sandeep suresh,
Dear Reinhard Meyer All,
Apology for not sending to the mailing list; forwarding
the same to the mailing list. There is already a #define
CONFIG_AT91SAM9260ek 1 in /include/configs/at91sam9260ek.h. I will check
further.
#define CONFIG_AT91SAM9G20EK !!!
I
shulin.zhou wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
I am using mx51 base board, I want to make u-boot booting from nand flash.
Does anyone knows how to modify the u-boot source?
You have to add support for the NAND controller, not yet in mainline.
Does add some code to init the nand flash controller in
Dear C Nauman,
On 23 August 2010 22:40, C Nauman cnau...@diagraph.com wrote:
This patch adds generic support for the Samsung s3c2440 processor.
Started from patch posted 2009-06-19 by
Kevin Morfitt. Then modified for changes in the code that have occurred
since.
Signed-off-by: Craig Nauman
Dear Mike Frysinger,
this usage string no longer makes sense. how about:
[bus:]cs[.mode] bit_len dout - Send bit_len bits from
dout out the SPI\n
The problem is, that without blowing up the parser even more, only
2 forms of the command are valid:
the classic form
cs bit_len dout
or
Le 24/08/2010 09:47, Rogan Dawes a écrit :
Yes, I still have the vendor u-boot flashed, so I can still see its
configuration. And, yes, it does allow reading the full 8MB of flash.
Vendor u-boot:
f1020040: 007f0f11 ff80
Mainline (8MB window):
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 18:38:15, Ben Gardiner wrote:
Split the existing dram_init for da8xx when ARM reloc is enabled, like the
changes to arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/orion5x/dram.c in
0f234d263b17ccf1b8fd776eb8c15b7cdb27a887 by Heiko Schocher h...@denx.de.
Without these changes gd-ram_size
On 2010/08/24 1:34 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Le 24/08/2010 09:47, Rogan Dawes a écrit :
Yes, I still have the vendor u-boot flashed, so I can still see its
configuration. And, yes, it does allow reading the full 8MB of flash.
Vendor u-boot:
f1020040: 007f0f11 ff80
Le 24/08/2010 14:17, Rogan Dawes a écrit :
On 2010/08/24 1:34 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Le 24/08/2010 09:47, Rogan Dawes a écrit :
Yes, I still have the vendor u-boot flashed, so I can still see its
configuration. And, yes, it does allow reading the full 8MB of flash.
Vendor u-boot:
Hi,
Dear all,
I am using the AT91SAM9G20EK kit and want to port Linux on this.
Actually Atmel has already done this, see http://www.linux4sam.org
the AT91SAM9260ek configuration as it seems the closest. The problem is after
building the U-boot with the sources for this board,
Fix orion5x_winctrl_calcsize() off-by-1 bug which caused mapping
windows to be cut by half. This afected all windows including NOR
flash (causing half the flash to be unaccessible) but DRAM was and
still is fine as its size is determined otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Albert Aribaud
Hi Damien
this patch seems to be doing alot better then the original one.
The root hub is detected and also it detects a device connected to the
controller.
However, by testing with a usbstick (mass storage) it fails to detect the
device as a storage device.
I have here a debug printout which
On Tuesday, August 24, 2010 02:39:16 David Jander wrote:
On Monday 23 August 2010 06:31:26 pm Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday, August 23, 2010 09:12:16 David Jander wrote:
+ {
+ .idcode1 = SPSN_ID_S25FL032A,
+ .idcode2 = SPSN_EXT_ID_S25FL032P,
+ .idmask2 =
For some reason Atmel changed the GPBR address for the AT91SAM9XE
to be different from the engineering samples and the AT91SAM9260.
Also let the correct SoC name be defined.
Signed-off-by: Reinhard Meyer u-b...@emk-elektronik.de
---
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91sam9260.h | 19
On Tuesday 24 August 2010 06:06:26 pm Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday, August 24, 2010 02:39:16 David Jander wrote:
On Monday 23 August 2010 06:31:26 pm Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday, August 23, 2010 09:12:16 David Jander wrote:
+ {
+ .idcode1 =
Hi Ben,
[Jocke deleted from CC as this is not about the patch anymore]
But I still want to know what will happen to it. I didn't
send this patch to start another discussion :)
Jocke
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
For some reason Atmel changed the GPBR address for the AT91SAM9XE
to be different from the engineering samples and the AT91SAM9260.
Also let the correct SoC name be defined.
Signed-off-by: Reinhard Meyer u-b...@emk-elektronik.de
---
one probably need not understand why the first mail
got
- 0 spaces
- 1 space
- 2 spaces
- 3 spaces
- 4 spaces
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
On Tuesday, August 24, 2010 14:36:43 David Jander wrote:
On Tuesday 24 August 2010 06:06:26 pm Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday, August 24, 2010 02:39:16 David Jander wrote:
On Monday 23 August 2010 06:31:26 pm Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday, August 23, 2010 09:12:16 David Jander wrote:
Hello,
I am developing a new board based on the OMAP3530 processor. It is not
the Beagleboard, but similar.
Where do I start to begin making a U-boot bootloader for my custom
board?
Thanks.
Patrick
___
U-Boot mailing list
On Tuesday, August 24, 2010 04:05:19 Reinhard Meyer wrote:
Dear Mike Frysinger,
were you going to send an updated version ?
Soon. Currently I have other issues and a rather
dirty working tree :)
dont sweat it. just wanted to make sure it wasnt lost/forgotten/ignored.
-mike
signature.asc
Le 24/08/2010 22:29, Boswell, Patrick a écrit :
Hello,
I am developing a new board based on the OMAP3530 processor. It is not
the Beagleboard, but similar.
Where do I start to begin making a U-boot bootloader for my custom
board?
Thanks.
Patrick
I would suggest pulling the latest git
Hi Elinar,
The root hub is detected and also it detects a device connected to the
controller.
However, by testing with a usbstick (mass storage) it fails to detect the
device as a storage device.
I have here a debug printout which is being printed (with debug enabled)
during execution of
Hi Reinhard,
-Original Message-
From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de
[mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Reinhard Meyer
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 10:00 PM
To: u-boot
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] AT91: add RTT and GPBR based RTC
adds kernel compatible RTC
Dear Xu, Hong,
adds kernel compatible RTC handling to u-boot using the RTT
and one GPBRegister
...
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_gpbr.h | 45 +
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_rtt.h | 36 ++
drivers/rtc/Makefile |1 +
Dear Xu, Hong,
Some of Atmel's ARM926EJS chips have builtin RTC, for example, SAM9G45
SAM9M10 SAM9RL and new X5 serials.
May we take this into account at this stage?
Maybe you can help me here:
the 9260 and the 9XE-ENG Sample (soldered on my EK)
have the GPBRs at 0xfd50.
Its sold as a
-Original Message-
From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.arib...@free.fr]
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 6:22 PM
To: Rogan Dawes
Cc: Chris Moore; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Prafulla Wadaskar
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] DNS323 (Orion5x) must double
ORION5X_SZ_BOOTROM to access full flash
Typically we declare the name of gpio structure to gpio,
so it was duplicated around the name. (e.g: gpio-gpio_a)
This patch modified the naming that is removing gpio_.
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang mk7.k...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
---
40 matches
Mail list logo
