Hi,
No it's used another place. that's reason not static function pointer.
I'll update it soon.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 2:33 AM, Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote:
There apparantly is no reason for having onenand_read_page abstracted.
Besides, it's static data
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 2:33 AM, Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote:
This allows to specify where the OneNAND IPL should load the U-Boot binary.
The
purpose of CONFIG_SYS_LOAD_ADDR is different I believe.
On PXA, this is needed with
Le 03/10/2010 01:07, Graeme Russ a écrit :
On 03/10/10 08:09, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Le 02/10/2010 22:39, Reinhard Meyer a écrit :
And as an idea, if position independent code is used, only pointers
in initialized data need adjustment. Cannot the linker emit a table
of addresses that need
On 03/10/10 18:10, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Le 03/10/2010 01:07, Graeme Russ a écrit :
On 03/10/10 08:09, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Le 02/10/2010 22:39, Reinhard Meyer a écrit :
And as an idea, if position independent code is used, only pointers
in initialized data need adjustment. Cannot the
Le 03/10/2010 10:44, Graeme Russ a écrit :
Bill just said that -pic (or, for ARM, -fPIC or -fPIE) was unnecessary
for relocation. You seem to imply it actually is... In my experience,
-fPIC and-fPIE do increase code by adding GOT relocation to symbols that
need fixing, so they would indeed be
Greetings,
Ive extended my bugsearching to find out why I cant get
everything working on my hp jornada flashrom (sa1110 + sa).
Im testing exactly same kernel(2.6.34) for both bootloaders so I know
the difference is in the bootloaders.
In short:
Blob works perfectly fine with bootloader and
Hi All,
I think the current denx/matser is broken and is not building up for OMAP3
platforms except Beagle board.
The error message on build is -
board.c: In function '__dram_init_banksize':
board.c:468: error: 'CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE' undeclared (first use in this
function)
board.c:468:
Le 03/10/2010 12:50, Hiremath, Vaibhav a écrit :
Hi All,
I think the current denx/matser is broken and is not building up for OMAP3
platforms except Beagle board.
The error message on build is -
board.c: In function '__dram_init_banksize':
board.c:468: error: 'CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE'
Hello.
On 02-10-2010 21:33, Marek Vasut wrote:
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com
[...]
diff --git a/common/cmd_onenand.c b/common/cmd_onenand.c
index 83d967b..fe84c3b 100644
--- a/common/cmd_onenand.c
+++ b/common/cmd_onenand.c
@@ -525,6 +525,12 @@ static cmd_tbl_t
-Original Message-
From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de]
On Behalf Of Albert ARIBAUD
Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 4:37 PM
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] denx/master is not building for OMAP3 platforms
except Beagle
Le
Dne Ne 3. října 2010 13:19:21 Sergei Shtylyov napsal(a):
Hello.
On 02-10-2010 21:33, Marek Vasut wrote:
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com
[...]
diff --git a/common/cmd_onenand.c b/common/cmd_onenand.c
index 83d967b..fe84c3b 100644
--- a/common/cmd_onenand.c
+++
Dne Ne 3. října 2010 08:40:55 Kyungmin Park napsal(a):
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
Added in my tree to commit message, Thanks!
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 2:33 AM, Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote:
This allows to specify where the OneNAND IPL should load the U-Boot
Dne Ne 3. října 2010 08:40:19 Kyungmin Park napsal(a):
Hi,
No it's used another place. that's reason not static function pointer.
I'll update it soon.
Hey, my problem is this code hangs my CPU. If I apply this patch, it doesn't
happen anymore.
Where is this used and what's your proposed
Greetings,
An update on the blob vs u-boot problems Im having. I noticed that driving
UART3 19200
on blob caused the same kind of issues that Im seeing in u-boot.
But downgrading baud = 19200 works in u-boot, but when booting kernel
I instead get scrambled data (which looks like wrong baud).
On 10/3/2010 1:58 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Le 03/10/2010 10:44, Graeme Russ a écrit :
Bill just said that -pic (or, for ARM, -fPIC or -fPIE) was unnecessary
for relocation. You seem to imply it actually is... In my experience,
-fPIC and-fPIE do increase code by adding GOT relocation to
With this implementation, the sentinel character in TARGET name is interpreted
as an option and expanded to CONFIG_MK_xxx.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com
---
boards.cfg |1 +
mkconfig |7 +--
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com
---
Makefile | 16
board/vpac270/vpac270.c |2 +-
boards.cfg|3 +++
include/configs/vpac270.h | 12 ++--
4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com
---
Makefile|8
board/trizepsiv/conxs.c |2 +-
boards.cfg |2 ++
include/configs/trizepsiv.h |6 +++---
4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile
Dne Ne 3. října 2010 18:34:34 Marek Vasut napsal(a):
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com
Missing MAKEALL entry removal handled in my tree ... will push this with a
final
version.
---
Makefile|8
board/trizepsiv/conxs.c |2 +-
Le 03/10/2010 17:36, J. William Campbell a écrit :
Hi All,
It is for sure that -fPIC/-fPIE programs will contain more executable
instructions than programs compiled without these options.
The program will also contain more data space for the got. If -fPIC
actually produced a fully
Le 03/10/2010 18:47, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
But the .rel.dyn generated by the linker section does not provide
symbols to mark its start and end, and I have found no documentation in
binutils ld which would describe how to rewrite the .rel.dyn section and
add these symbols myself.
How did
Dear Reinhard Meyer,
In message 4ca6e8e5.2090...@emk-elektronik.de you wrote:
And yes, this means the content arrays of pointers such as init_sequence
is not relocated. Been there, done that, can give you one of the
tee-shirts I got :)
It should work.
Eventually we need to find out which
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message 4ca6ec99.5080...@free.fr you wrote:
There are two ways to fix that:
...
We should find the third way, which is that the tools actually
incude these pointers into the GOT so they get relocated
automatically.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message 4ca6fb7e.3070...@free.fr you wrote:
Short answer - the relocation process does not handle pointers inside
data structures.
And yes, this means the content arrays of pointers such as init_sequence
is not relocated. Been there, done that, can give you one
Dear Marek Vasut,
In message 1286029567-30231-1-git-send-email-marek.va...@gmail.com you wrote:
This moves struct nand_bbt_descr largepage_memorybased into .data.rel, which
allows it to be PIC with current U-Boot infrastructure for relocation.
Also, I squished the ff_patternt into the
Dear J. William Campbell,
In message 4ca75bfb.5030...@comcast.net you wrote:
And I think there are more places of this type in u-boot...
Yes, maybe. But relocation as I did for arm, also works
on m68k, sparc, mips, avr32 and they must do also this
fixups, so for common functions (except
Dear Marek Vasut,
In message 201010022059.53303.marek.va...@gmail.com you wrote:
I've prepared same patch. :)
Oh, I'm sorry, I haven't noticed. Please merge whichever you find more
suitable.
NAK!
I want to see this fixed at the base, not by adding workarounds.
Best regards,
Wolfgang
Dear Reinhard Meyer,
In message 4ca77afa.2090...@emk-elektronik.de you wrote:
My AT91 boards will not use relocation for the time being, and if
relocation is god-like enforced I will find a way not to use it.
I don't need to spend 10% more code for all that trouble.
Please see
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message 1286048840-1901-1-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org you wrote:
Many people like the current nand_init() behavior where it is always
initialized during boot and the flash size shown, but there are cases
where we are willing to forgo this niceness for
Dear Reinhard Meyer,
In message 4ca79896.2010...@emk-elektronik.de you wrote:
I agree here. _If_ relocation, it should work without hand-adding
fixup stuff to all functions using initialized data with pointers.
Even Wolfgang forgot to fixup his 2nd level command table in
cmd_nvedit.c ;)
I
Le 03/10/2010 20:03, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
Dear Reinhard Meyer,
In message4ca6e8e5.2090...@emk-elektronik.de you wrote:
And yes, this means the content arrays of pointers such as init_sequence
is not relocated. Been there, done that, can give you one of the
tee-shirts I got :)
It
Dear Hiremath, Vaibhav,
In message 19f8576c6e063c45be387c64729e739404aa21c...@dbde02.ent.ti.com you
wrote:
Note that adding the definition may not be sufficient to get relocation
working.
[Hiremath, Vaibhav] But atleast it will make code to compile cleanly. I feel,
at any cost we
Dear Marek Vasut,
In message 201010031625.00339.marek.va...@gmail.com you wrote:
+#ifndef CONFIG_RELOC_FIXUP_WORKS
+void onenand_reloc(void) {
{ should be on a separate line.
WBR, Sergei
Fixed in my tree, thanks!
Keep in mind that your tree is totally uninteresting to
Dear J. William Campbell,
In message 4ca8a2e0.7090...@comcast.net you wrote:
executable instructions than programs compiled without these options.
The program will also contain more data space for the got. If -fPIC
actually produced a fully position-independent executable, the extra
overhead
Dne Ne 3. října 2010 20:21:33 Wolfgang Denk napsal(a):
Dear Marek Vasut,
In message 201010022059.53303.marek.va...@gmail.com you wrote:
I've prepared same patch. :)
Oh, I'm sorry, I haven't noticed. Please merge whichever you find more
suitable.
NAK!
I want to see this fixed at
On 10/3/2010 11:29 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Reinhard Meyer,
In message4ca79896.2010...@emk-elektronik.de you wrote:
I agree here. _If_ relocation, it should work without hand-adding
fixup stuff to all functions using initialized data with pointers.
Even Wolfgang forgot to fixup his
Le 03/10/2010 20:54, J. William Campbell a écrit :
Agreed. This should be possible to do now that there is a better
understanding of the ELF format by the u-boot community. Perhaps the
place to start would be trying to port what Graeme has done to ARM or
perhaps better yet, PPC. Since lots of
Dear Marek Vasut,
In message 1286123674-13461-1-git-send-email-marek.va...@gmail.com you wrote:
With this implementation, the sentinel character in TARGET name is interpreted
as an option and expanded to CONFIG_MK_xxx.
Sorry, but this is not the implementation we discussed in the past.
I know
Dear Marek Vasut,
In message 1286123674-13461-2-git-send-email-marek.va...@gmail.com you wrote:
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com
---
Makefile | 16
board/vpac270/vpac270.c |2 +-
boards.cfg|3 +++
Dear Marek Vasut,
In message 1286123674-13461-3-git-send-email-marek.va...@gmail.com you wrote:
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com
---
Makefile|8
board/trizepsiv/conxs.c |2 +-
boards.cfg |2 ++
On Sunday, October 03, 2010 14:27:13 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
Many people like the current nand_init() behavior where it is always
initialized during boot and the flash size shown, but there are cases
where we are willing to forgo this niceness for speed/functionality.
With this implementation, the sentinel character in TARGET name is interpreted
as an option and expanded to CONFIG_MK_xxx.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com
---
v2: Use comma, permit assignment
boards.cfg |1 +
mkconfig | 10 +++---
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3
Dear Marek Vasut,
In message 201010032124.29154.marek.va...@gmail.com you wrote:
Oh, I'm sorry, I haven't noticed. Please merge whichever you find more
suitable.
NAK!
I want to see this fixed at the base, not by adding workarounds.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
And
Dear Marek Vasut,
In message 1286140454-19572-1-git-send-email-marek.va...@gmail.com you wrote:
With this implementation, the sentinel character in TARGET name is interpreted
as an option and expanded to CONFIG_MK_xxx.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com
---
v2: Use comma,
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message 201010031632.47732.vap...@gentoo.org you wrote:
Would it not be esier to rename your nand_delayed_init() into
nand_init(), and add a #ifndef CONFIG_SYS_NAND_DELAYED_INIT around
the current call to nand_init()?
nand_init() cant handle being called multiple
On Sunday, October 03, 2010 17:40:32 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
Would it not be esier to rename your nand_delayed_init() into
nand_init(), and add a #ifndef CONFIG_SYS_NAND_DELAYED_INIT around
the current call to nand_init()?
nand_init() cant handle being called
There are some boards where it's not currently possible to detect all board
information at runtime, therefore I introduced a new column called options to
boards.cfg .
This column can contain multiple options, separated by comma [,] . In case
there's a simple options like 256M_U_BOOT, it's plain
Dne Ne 3. října 2010 16:27:04 Marek Vasut napsal(a):
Dne Ne 3. října 2010 08:40:19 Kyungmin Park napsal(a):
Hi,
No it's used another place. that's reason not static function pointer.
I'll update it soon.
Hey, my problem is this code hangs my CPU. If I apply this patch, it
doesn't
Dne Po 20. září 2010 03:57:25 Marek Vasut napsal(a):
This fixes TIMEOUT with my Kingston 32GB USB3.0 flashdrive, which I
experienced on my PXA270 (USB 1.1) Vpac270 board.
CC Remy
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com
---
drivers/usb/host/ohci-hcd.c |2 +-
1 files changed,
Hi,
There's no OneNAND tree but all patches are mainlined by Scott Wood's tree.
And related with patch. I wonder why it's problem with your board?
As it's function pointer. It should be located the data section and it's
assigned at runtime.
Maybe your board runs the code at OneNAND directly.
Dne So 2. října 2010 19:33:56 Marek Vasut napsal(a):
This moves struct nand_bbt_descr largepage_memorybased into
onenand_default_bbt as that's the only place where this is used.
This also removes an entry from .data section. (For me, this section
disappears after relocation).
Scott, can you
Dne Po 4. října 2010 01:45:16 Kyungmin Park napsal(a):
Hi,
There's no OneNAND tree but all patches are mainlined by Scott Wood's tree.
And related with patch. I wonder why it's problem with your board?
As it's function pointer. It should be located the data section and it's
assigned at
Hi All,
I have finally achieved my goal of creating a fully relocatable u-boot.bin
image. What this means is that U-Boot can be build for any TEXT_BASE and
loaded at any RAM address (see caveat 2 below) and executed using the 'go'
command. U-Boot will relocate to upper memory and run as if loaded
Relocation is not board-specific for the x86 architectrure, so
CONFIG_RELOC_FIXUP_WORKS can be defined globally in the config.h
Signed-off-by: Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com
---
arch/i386/include/asm/config.h |2 ++
include/configs/eNET.h |2 --
2 files changed, 2
Use TEXT_BASE rather than a hard-coded base address on x86 linker scripts.
This will allow any board to define its base link address without having
to modify the linker script
Signed-off-by: Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com
---
board/eNET/u-boot.lds |8
1 files changed, 4
The header of recent Linux Kernels includes the size of the image, and
therefore is not needed to be passed to zboot. Still process the third
parameter (size of image) in the event that an older kernel is being loaded
Signed-off-by: Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com
---
arch/i386/lib/zimage.c |
Follow the discussion of Charles Manning and Mike Frysinger.
Using gc_sections helps reduce image size.
Signed-off-by: Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com
---
arch/i386/config.mk |3 +++
board/eNET/u-boot.lds | 10 +-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git
Linux has C macros and code to load the GTD after switching to Protected
Mode. Using these greatly simplifies the assembler code
Signed-off-by: Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com
---
arch/i386/cpu/cpu.c | 57 +
arch/i386/cpu/start.S | 96
Change to:
- reparam=3
- no-from-pointer
- no-stack-protector
- preferred-stack-boundary=2
- no-top-level-reorder
These options make the code a little smaller and faster
Signed-off-by: Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com
---
arch/i386/config.mk |8
Signed-off-by: Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com
---
arch/i386/cpu/interrupts.c| 23 +++
arch/i386/include/asm/interrupt.h |2 ++
arch/i386/include/asm/ptrace.h| 24
3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git
Perform some basic code cleanups of the x86 files
Signed-off-by: Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com
---
arch/i386/cpu/sc520/sc520.c | 54 ++--
arch/i386/cpu/sc520/sc520_asm.S | 642 +++
arch/i386/cpu/start.S | 30 +-
arch/i386/cpu/start16.S
Progress indication is not relocation friendly so remove it in
preperation for full relocatability support
Signed-off-by: Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com
---
arch/i386/cpu/start.S | 44 ++--
board/eNET/eNET_start.S | 12
2 files
To allow for 'load anywhere' images, the %ebp return pointer 'hack' must
be removed, so we cannot have two 'calls' to get_mem_size
Signed-off-by: Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com
---
arch/i386/cpu/sc520/sc520_asm.S | 17 +++--
arch/i386/cpu/start.S | 11 +++
2
Using %ebp as a return pointer prevents creating 'load anywhere' images
Signed-off-by: Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com
---
arch/i386/cpu/sc520/sc520_asm.S |6 +++---
arch/i386/cpu/start.S | 10 +-
arch/i386/cpu/start16.S |2 +-
board/eNET/eNET_start.S
By using another register, reduce code size by one instruction
Signed-off-by: Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com
---
arch/i386/cpu/start.S |5 ++---
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/i386/cpu/start.S b/arch/i386/cpu/start.S
index 247b120..045b51e 100644
---
By reserving space for the Global Data immediately below the stack during
assembly level initialisation, the C declaration of the static global data
can be removed, along with the 'RAM Bootstrap' function. This results in
cleaner code, and the ability to pass boot-up flags from assembler into C
Signed-off-by: Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com
---
arch/i386/cpu/start.S | 19 ++-
arch/i386/cpu/start16.S |7 ---
arch/i386/include/asm/global_data.h |3 +++
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git
Create more generic names for the symbols exported from the linker script
Signed-off-by: Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com
---
arch/i386/lib/bios_setup.c | 14 +++---
arch/i386/lib/board.c | 20 ++--
arch/i386/lib/realmode.c | 14 +++---
Tidy up the linker script and discard some sections to save space
Signed-off-by: Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com
---
arch/i386/lib/board.c |5 +++--
board/eNET/u-boot.lds | 39 ++-
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git
Provides a small speed increase and prepares for fully relocatable image.
Downside is the TEXT_BASE, bss, load address etc must ALL be aligned on a
a 4-byte boundary which is not such a terrible restriction as everything
is already 4-byte aligned anyway
Signed-off-by: Graeme Russ
u-boot.bin can be loaded at any 4-byte aligned memory location and directly
'jumped' to using the 'go' command using the load address as the start
address. Doing so performs a 'warm boot' which skips memory initialisation
and other low-level initialisations, relocates U-Boot to upper memory and
Hi Wolfgang,
snip
Well, please keep in mind that all this code is working find on
PowerPC, which has been using relocation right from the beginning.
It is my understanding that we don't suffer from this issue any more
on PPC - Peter Tyser posted relocation fixup patches for PPC about a
Dear Marek Vasut,
In message 201010040136.27940.marek.va...@gmail.com you wrote:
Dne Po 20. zá#í 2010 03:57:25 Marek Vasut napsal(a):
This fixes TIMEOUT with my Kingston 32GB USB3.0 flashdrive, which I
experienced on my PXA270 (USB 1.1) Vpac270 board.
CC Remy
How do you expoect this to
73 matches
Mail list logo
