Re: [U-Boot] USB storage performance EHCI question

2011-01-14 Thread Aaron Williams
On 1/14/2011 1:19 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Aaron Williams, > > please always keep the ML on cc: > > In message<4d2fa7f0.7020...@caviumnetworks.com> you wrote: >> It is based off of 2010.09 but I have applied all of the latest USB >> updates from GIT with the exception of the multiple LUN su

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4 V2] Add basic NVIDIA Tegra2 SoC support

2011-01-14 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Peter Tyser, In message <1295047406.29642.6729.camel@petert> you wrote: > > Agreed, I should have dug deeper. On PPC we use out_be32() or similar > to access memory mapped registers, which does have an explicit barrier. > I'm not familiar with ARM so don't know what the proper access functi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2 v2] BLOCK: Add freescale IMX51 PATA driver

2011-01-14 Thread stefano babic
Am 13.01.2011 18:27, schrieb Marek Vasut: > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut > --- > v2: Fixed line-too-long bugs as proposed by Stefano > > drivers/block/Makefile |1 + > drivers/block/mxc_ata.c | 149 > +++ > 2 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 0 de

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4 V2] Add basic NVIDIA Tegra2 SoC support

2011-01-14 Thread Peter Tyser
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 00:00 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hello, > > Le 14/01/2011 23:39, Tom Warren a écrit : > > > So instead of, say uart->lcr = 0, you'd prefer writel(0, uart->lcr), > > where writel = __arch_putl(v, a) = (*(volatile unsigned int *)(a) = > > (v))? > > Is that different enough

[U-Boot] I quit Network Marketing!

2011-01-14 Thread Bryce Vellinga
I've been a top producer in Network Marketing, I've had who knows how many day jobs and I have always had to work harder for less money. You've heard, stop working harder and start working smarter... This is smarter, and easier too! Do yourself a favor and check this easy turn key system out! N

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4 V2] Add basic NVIDIA Tegra2 SoC support

2011-01-14 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hello, Le 14/01/2011 23:39, Tom Warren a écrit : > So instead of, say uart->lcr = 0, you'd prefer writel(0, uart->lcr), > where writel = __arch_putl(v, a) = (*(volatile unsigned int *)(a) = > (v))? > Is that different enough from 'uart->lcr = 0' to warrant the change? > Does it add some HW barrie

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4 V2] Add basic NVIDIA Tegra2 SoC support

2011-01-14 Thread Tom Warren
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Peter Tyser wrote: > On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 13:41 -0700, Tom Warren wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Peter Tyser wrote: >> > Hi Tom, >> > >> > On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 10:11 -0700, Tom Warren wrote: >> >> This series of patches adds preliminary/baseline sup

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4 V2] Add basic NVIDIA Tegra2 SoC support

2011-01-14 Thread Peter Tyser
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 13:41 -0700, Tom Warren wrote: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Peter Tyser wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 10:11 -0700, Tom Warren wrote: > >> This series of patches adds preliminary/baseline support for NVIDIA's > >> Tegra2 SoC. Basic CPU (AVP), RAM and

[U-Boot] Aggiorna il tuo account e-mail

2011-01-14 Thread upgradeacct
Gentile Utente Webmail Abbiamo temporaneamente limitato l'accesso a tutte le caratteristiche Sensibile a tutti gli account webmail. Per ripristinare il tuo account di accesso, è necessario rispondere subito a questa e-mail con la vostra Nome utente e password. Nickname: () Password: (). Perch

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4 V2] Add basic NVIDIA Tegra2 SoC support

2011-01-14 Thread Tom Warren
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Peter Tyser wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 10:11 -0700, Tom Warren wrote: >> This series of patches adds preliminary/baseline support for NVIDIA's >> Tegra2 SoC.  Basic CPU (AVP), RAM and UART init are covered so that the >> system (Harmony or Seaboard

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4 V2] Add basic NVIDIA Tegra2 SoC support

2011-01-14 Thread Peter Tyser
Hi Tom, On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 10:11 -0700, Tom Warren wrote: > This series of patches adds preliminary/baseline support for NVIDIA's > Tegra2 SoC. Basic CPU (AVP), RAM and UART init are covered so that the > system (Harmony or Seaboard) can boot to the U-Boot serial cmd prompt. > > Further suppo

Re: [U-Boot] [v3 patch 2/4] SMDK6400: Fix some label undefined in build error

2011-01-14 Thread seedshope
On 01/15/2011 02:15 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Le 14/01/2011 17:56, seedshope a écrit : >> On 01/15/2011 12:39 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >>> Hi seedshope, >>> >>> Le 14/01/2011 16:45, seedshope a écrit : On 01/14/2011 02:07 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Le 13/01/2011 14:36, seedshope a écri

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] ARM: mx31pdk: Use the new relocation scheme

2011-01-14 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Stefano, On 1/13/2011 11:38 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: > On 01/12/2011 01:49 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: >> Hi, > > Hi Fabio, > >> >> I am trying to make the new relocation scheme to work on the mx31pdk board. >> >> With this patch applied the mx31pdk build works, but not able to get a >> U-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/7] mxc_nand: add support for i.MX35 processor

2011-01-14 Thread Scott Wood
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:35:21 +0100 Stefano Babic wrote: > Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic > --- > drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c |6 +++--- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Acked-by: Scott Wood -Scott ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot

Re: [U-Boot] [v3 patch 2/4] SMDK6400: Fix some label undefined in build error

2011-01-14 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 14/01/2011 17:56, seedshope a écrit : > On 01/15/2011 12:39 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >> Hi seedshope, >> >> Le 14/01/2011 16:45, seedshope a écrit : >>> On 01/14/2011 02:07 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Le 13/01/2011 14:36, seedshope a écrit : > Modify Makefile for cpu_init.c and Start.s u

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4 V2] serial: Add Tegra2 serial port support

2011-01-14 Thread Tom Warren
Enable support for serial output on Tegra2 builds Signed-off-by: Tom Warren --- common/serial.c |3 ++- include/serial.h |3 ++- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/common/serial.c b/common/serial.c index 051ae4e..8ebf9a5 100644 --- a/common/serial.c +++ b/com

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4 V2] arm: Tegra2: Add basic NVIDIA Tegra2 SoC support

2011-01-14 Thread Tom Warren
Add basic support for NVIDIA Tegra2 SoC chipset Signed-off-by: Tom Warren --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra2/Makefile | 48 ++ arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra2/board.c| 91 ++ arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra2/config.mk | 28 +++ arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra2/lowlevel_i

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4 V2] arm: Tegra2: Add support for NVIDIA Seaboard board

2011-01-14 Thread Tom Warren
Basic support for the NVIDIA Seaboard board. U-Boot will load and respond to serial console commands with this patch. Further peripheral support (USB, SD/MMC, SPI, etc.) to follow. Signed-off-by: Tom Warren --- MAINTAINERS|1 + board/nvidia/seaboard/Makefile | 50 ++

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4 V2] arm: Tegra2: Add support for NVIDIA Harmony board

2011-01-14 Thread Tom Warren
Basic support for the NVIDIA Harmony board. U-Boot will load and respond to serial console commands with this patch. Further peripheral support (USB, SD/MMC, NAND, etc.) to follow. Signed-off-by: Tom Warren --- MAINTAINERS |4 + board/nvidia/harmony/Makefile | 50

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4 V2] Add basic NVIDIA Tegra2 SoC support

2011-01-14 Thread Tom Warren
This series of patches adds preliminary/baseline support for NVIDIA's Tegra2 SoC. Basic CPU (AVP), RAM and UART init are covered so that the system (Harmony or Seaboard) can boot to the U-Boot serial cmd prompt. Further support (for Cortex-A9 CPU(s), USB, SD/MMC, etc.) to follow. V2: Make change

Re: [U-Boot] [v3 patch 2/4] SMDK6400: Fix some label undefined in build error

2011-01-14 Thread seedshope
On 01/15/2011 12:39 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi seedshope, > > Le 14/01/2011 16:45, seedshope a écrit : >> On 01/14/2011 02:07 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >>> Le 13/01/2011 14:36, seedshope a écrit : Modify Makefile for cpu_init.c and Start.s use some label,this defined u-boot.lds of arc

Re: [U-Boot] uboot load ftb

2011-01-14 Thread Scott Wood
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:44:44 +0800 张扬 wrote: > Dear Scott Wood > > 2011/1/13 Scott Wood : > > On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:00:52 +0100 > > Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > > >> Dear =?UTF-8?B?5byg5oms?=, > >> > >> In message > >> you wrote: > >> > > >> > > i trying to sue the kernel's Makefile rule, but th

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/85xx: Add Support for Freescale P1014 Processor

2011-01-14 Thread Kumar Gala
From: Poonam Aggrwal The P1014 is similar to the P1010 processor with the following differences: - 16bit DDR with ECC. (P1010 has 32bit DDR w/o ECC) - no eCAN interface. (P1010 has 2 eCAN interfaces) - Two SGMII interface (P1010 has 3 SGMII) - No secure boot Signed-off-by: Poonam Aggrwal Signe

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/85xx: Add Support for Freescale P1010 Processor

2011-01-14 Thread Kumar Gala
From: Poonam Aggrwal Key Features include of the P1010: * e500v2 core frequency operation of 500 to 800 MHz * Power consumption less than 5.0 W at 800 MHz core speed * Dual SATA 3 Gbps controllers with integrated PHY * Dual PCI Express controllers * Three 10/100/1000 Mbps enhanced triple-speed Et

Re: [U-Boot] [v3 patch 2/4] SMDK6400: Fix some label undefined in build error

2011-01-14 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi seedshope, Le 14/01/2011 16:45, seedshope a écrit : > On 01/14/2011 02:07 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >> Le 13/01/2011 14:36, seedshope a écrit : >>> Modify Makefile for cpu_init.c and Start.s use some label,this defined >>> u-boot.lds of arch/arm/cpu/arm1176. But SMDK6400 use the link script >>>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/8] 8xxx/ddr: add support to only compute the ddr sdram size

2011-01-14 Thread Kumar Gala
On Dec 1, 2010, at 9:35 AM, wrote: > From: Haiying Wang > > This patch adds fsl_ddr_sdram_size to only calculate the ddr sdram size, in > case that the DDR SDRAM is initialized in the 2nd stage uboot and should not > be intialized again in the final stage uboot. > > Signed-off-by: Haiying W

Re: [U-Boot] new board with common code

2011-01-14 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jan 14, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Fabian Cenedese wrote: >> >> Before we go into details we should define a strategy. Can you please >> be specific: which exact files are you talking about? > > One thing was pixis, but as we don't have that FPGA I could remove > all references to it. Also missing

Re: [U-Boot] new board with common code

2011-01-14 Thread Fabian Cenedese
>> I'm adding a new board. It's very similar to freescale's P2020DS, that's >> why I used this code as starting point. The problem is now that it still >> uses some code from board/freescale/common. At the first try this >> didn't get built and therefore I get link errors. What's the preferred >>

Re: [U-Boot] [v3 patch 2/4] SMDK6400: Fix some label undefined in build error

2011-01-14 Thread seedshope
On 01/14/2011 11:45 PM, seedshope wrote: > On 01/14/2011 02:07 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >> Le 13/01/2011 14:36, seedshope a écrit : >>> Modify Makefile for cpu_init.c and Start.s use some label,this defined >>> u-boot.lds of arch/arm/cpu/arm1176. But SMDK6400 use the link script >>> board/samsung/

Re: [U-Boot] [v3 patch 4/4] SMDK6400: Fix SMDK6400 SDRAM init

2011-01-14 Thread seedshope
On 01/14/2011 08:53 AM, Minkyu Kang wrote: > Dear seedshope, > > On 13 January 2011 22:36, seedshope wrote: >> Since SDRAM init function have already change, So the SDRAM >> initial function must be change. >> >> Signed-off-by: seedshope >> >> diff --git a/board/samsung/smdk6400/smdk6400.c >> b/b

Re: [U-Boot] [v3 patch 2/4] SMDK6400: Fix some label undefined in build error

2011-01-14 Thread seedshope
On 01/14/2011 02:07 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Le 13/01/2011 14:36, seedshope a écrit : >> Modify Makefile for cpu_init.c and Start.s use some label,this defined >> u-boot.lds of arch/arm/cpu/arm1176. But SMDK6400 use the link script >> board/samsung/smdk6400/u-boot-nand.lds. So add some label for

[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/7] Add basic support for Freescale's mc9sdz60

2011-01-14 Thread Stefano Babic
The patch adds helper funtions for basic access to the registers of the MC9sdz60 chip (multifunctional device with RTC and CAN) via I2C interface. Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic --- drivers/misc/Makefile |1 + drivers/misc/mc9sdz60.c | 51 include/mc9sdz60.h

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/7] mxc_nand: add support for i.MX35 processor

2011-01-14 Thread Stefano Babic
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic --- drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c |6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c index ec71cfc..2a8dd7e 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c @@

[U-Boot] [PATCH 7/7] Add support for Freescale's mx35pdk board.

2011-01-14 Thread Stefano Babic
The patch adds suupport for the Freescale's mx35pdk board (known as well as mx35_3stack). The board boots from the NOR flash. Following devices are supported: - two ethernet devices (FEC and SMC911x on debug board) - I2C - PMIC (MC13892) via I2C interface - UART - NOR flash (64MB) - NAND fla

[U-Boot] [PATCH 6/7] mxc_spi: add support for i.MX35 processor

2011-01-14 Thread Stefano Babic
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic --- drivers/spi/mxc_spi.c | 96 + 1 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/spi/mxc_spi.c b/drivers/spi/mxc_spi.c index d558137..b353c83 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/mxc_spi.c +++ b/drivers/s

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/7] serial_mxc: add support for Freescale's i.MX35 processor

2011-01-14 Thread Stefano Babic
The patch adds UART support for the i.MX35 processor. Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic --- drivers/serial/serial_mxc.c |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/serial/serial_mxc.c b/drivers/serial/serial_mxc.c index f96b21f..2dcae40 100644 --- a/drivers/ser

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/7] mxc_i2c: Add support for the i.MX35 processor

2011-01-14 Thread Stefano Babic
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic --- drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c | 16 ++-- 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c b/drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c index 8e10fbb..74a984d 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c @@ -26,8 +26,13 @@

Re: [U-Boot] new board with common code

2011-01-14 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jan 14, 2011, at 5:39 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Fabian Cenedese, > > In message <5.2.0.9.1.20110114115035.036b5778@localhost> you wrote: >> >> I'm adding a new board. It's very similar to freescale's P2020DS, that's >> why I used this code as starting point. The problem is now that it

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] mpq101: initial support for Mercury Computer Systems MPQ101 board

2011-01-14 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jan 14, 2011, at 3:10 AM, Alex Dubov wrote: > Mpq101 is a RapidIO development board in AMC form factor, featuring MPC8548 > processor, 512MB of hardwired DDR2 RAM, 128MB of hardwired NAND flash > memory, real time clock and additional serial EEPROM on i2c bus (enabled). > USB controller is ava

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] mpq101: initial support for Mercury Computer Systems MPQ101 board

2011-01-14 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jan 14, 2011, at 3:10 AM, Alex Dubov wrote: > Mpq101 is a RapidIO development board in AMC form factor, featuring MPC8548 > processor, 512MB of hardwired DDR2 RAM, 128MB of hardwired NAND flash > memory, real time clock and additional serial EEPROM on i2c bus (enabled). > USB controller is av

Re: [U-Boot] new board with common code

2011-01-14 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Fabian Cenedese, In message <5.2.0.9.1.20110114115035.036b5778@localhost> you wrote: > > I'm adding a new board. It's very similar to freescale's P2020DS, that's > why I used this code as starting point. The problem is now that it still > uses some code from board/freescale/common. At the fi

[U-Boot] new board with common code

2011-01-14 Thread Fabian Cenedese
Hi I'm adding a new board. It's very similar to freescale's P2020DS, that's why I used this code as starting point. The problem is now that it still uses some code from board/freescale/common. At the first try this didn't get built and therefore I get link errors. What's the preferred way in this

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2 v2] mpc5200, digsy_mtc: add support for rev5 board version

2011-01-14 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Heiko, > difference to previous board version: > - M29W128GH flash from Numonyx > - SDRAM ISSI IS45S16800 (Option A2 105°C) > - rev5 uses RTC RV-3029-C2 > - update cs0 and cs1 baseaddr and length > depending on the detected flash size. > - added Werner Pfister > as maintainer for the digsy

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4] mpq101: initial support for Mercury Computer Systems MPQ101 board

2011-01-14 Thread Alex Dubov
Mpq101 is a RapidIO development board in AMC form factor, featuring MPC8548 processor, 512MB of hardwired DDR2 RAM, 128MB of hardwired NAND flash memory, real time clock and additional serial EEPROM on i2c bus (enabled). USB controller is available, but not presently enabled. Additional board info