Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Fix variable flavor in examples/standalone/Makefile

2011-02-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Che-liang Chiou, In message you wrote: > GNU Makefile have two flavors of variables, recursively expanded that is > defined by using '=', and simply expanded that is defined by using ':='. > > The bug is caused by using recursively expanded flavor for BIN and SREC. You wrote "The bug". H

Re: [U-Boot] OMAP3 Beagle Pin Mux initialization issue

2011-02-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Bob Feretich, In message <4d6316a8.4090...@prodigy.net> you wrote: > The BeagleBoard beagle.c file contains: > 242 /* Configure GPIOs to output */ > 243 writel(~(GPIO23 | GPIO10 | GPIO8 | GPIO2 | GPIO1), > &gpio6_base->oe); > 244 writel(~(GPIO31 | GPIO30 | GPIO2

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Fix variable flavor in examples/standalone/Makefile

2011-02-21 Thread Che-liang Chiou
GNU Makefile have two flavors of variables, recursively expanded that is defined by using '=', and simply expanded that is defined by using ':='. The bug is caused by using recursively expanded flavor for BIN and SREC. As you can see below, they are prepended by $(obj) twice. We can reproduce thi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] MX5:MX53: support for freescale MX53LOCO board

2011-02-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Liu Hui-R64343, In message <2cf7613b9822a943bef13ef7acec5bd114a...@039-sn1mpn1-003.039d.mgd.msft.net> you wrote: > > >> +# (C Copyright 2011 > >> +# Jason Liu Freescale Software Engineering r64...@freescale.com > > > >Why don´t you use the standard Freescale copyright header here instead?

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] MX5:MX53: support for freescale MX53LOCO board

2011-02-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Liu Hui-R64343, In message <2cf7613b9822a943bef13ef7acec5bd114a...@039-sn1mpn1-003.039d.mgd.msft.net> you wrote: > > >As I discovered myself, usage of config.mk is discouraged and it should be > >removed and it is not accepted anymore for new boards. Instead of that, it is > >possible to a

[U-Boot] OMAP3 Beagle Pin Mux initialization issue

2011-02-21 Thread Bob Feretich
The BeagleBoard beagle.c file contains: 242 /* Configure GPIOs to output */ 243 writel(~(GPIO23 | GPIO10 | GPIO8 | GPIO2 | GPIO1), &gpio6_base->oe); 244 writel(~(GPIO31 | GPIO30 | GPIO29 | GPIO28 | GPIO22 | GPIO21 | 245 GPIO15 | GPIO14 | GPIO13 | GPI

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] ARM: Update mach types

2011-02-21 Thread Liu Hui-R64343
Hi, Fabio, Best Regards, Jason Liu >-Original Message- >From: Fabio Estevam [mailto:fabioeste...@yahoo.com] >Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 1:36 AM >To: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Liu Hui-R64343 >Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] ARM: Update mach types > >Hi Jason, > >--- On Mon, 2/21/11, J

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] MX5:MX53: support for freescale MX53LOCO board

2011-02-21 Thread Liu Hui-R64343
Hi, Fabio, >-Original Message- >From: Fabio Estevam [mailto:fabioeste...@yahoo.com] >Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 7:38 AM >To: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Liu Hui-R64343 >Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] MX5:MX53: support for freescale >MX53LOCO board > >Hi Jason, > >--- On Mon, 2/21/11, J

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] MX5:MX53: support for freescale MX53LOCO board

2011-02-21 Thread Liu Hui-R64343
Hi, Stefano, >-Original Message- >From: Stefano Babic [mailto:sba...@denx.de] >Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 8:46 PM >To: Liu Hui-R64343 >Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; sba...@denx.de >Subject: Re: [U-Boot][PATCH 1/1] MX5:MX53: support for freescale MX53LOCO >board > >On 02/21/2011 11:15 AM,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] MX5:MX53: support for freescale MX53LOCO board

2011-02-21 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Jason, --- On Mon, 2/21/11, Jason Liu wrote: ... > --- /dev/null > +++ b/board/freescale/mx53loco/imximage.cfg > @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ > +# > +# (C Copyright 2009 > +# Stefano Babic DENX Software Engineering sba...@denx.de. > +# (C Copyright 2011 > +# Jason Liu Freescale Software Engineering r64...

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 7/7] mpc85xx: Add board support for the eXMeritus HWW-1U-1A devices

2011-02-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear "Moffett, Kyle D", In message <475ab4e4-f287-44e3-8a16-213506955...@boeing.com> you wrote: > ... > >> +U_BOOT_CMD( > >> + hww1u1a_is_cpu_a, 1, 0, do_hww1u1a_is_cpu_a, > >> + "Test if this is CPU A (versus B) on the eXMeritus HWW-1U-1A board", > >> + /* */" && echo This is CPU A\n" > >> +

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/7] mpc85xx: Add inline GPIO acessor functions

2011-02-21 Thread Moffett, Kyle D
On Feb 21, 2011, at 16:14, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <1298311199-18775-4-git-send-email-kyle.d.moff...@boeing.com> you > wrote: >> To ease the implementation of other MPC85xx board ports, several common >> GPIO helpers are added to . > > In which way is this specific to 85xx? Why not mak

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] MX5:MX53: support for freescale MX53LOCO board

2011-02-21 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Jason, --- On Mon, 2/21/11, Liu Hui-R64343 wrote: ... > >> +# (C Copyright 2009 > >> +# Stefano Babic DENX Software Engineering sba...@denx.de. > >> +# (C Copyright 2011 > >> +# Jason Liu Freescale Software Engineering r64...@freescale.com > > > >Why don´t you use the standard Freescale copyr

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/7] mpc8xxx: DDR2/3: Use human-readable SPD DIMM-type constants

2011-02-21 Thread Moffett, Kyle D
On Feb 21, 2011, at 16:03, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <1298311199-18775-3-git-send-email-kyle.d.moff...@boeing.com> you > wrote: >> Use #define constants to enhance readability of DDR2/3 SPD parsing code. >> Also add the DDR2 type for an SO-RDIMM module to the switch statement. >> >> Signe

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/7] mpc85xx: Support a board-specific processor reset routines

2011-02-21 Thread Moffett, Kyle D
On Feb 21, 2011, at 15:59, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <1298311199-18775-2-git-send-email-kyle.d.moff...@boeing.com> you > wrote: >> Some board models (such as the submitted P2020-based HWW-1U-1A hardware) >> need specialized code to run when a reset is requested to ensure proper >> synchron

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-arm

2011-02-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Albert ARIBAUD, In message <4d621552.7090...@free.fr> you wrote: > Hi Wolfgang, > > Please pull the following from u-boot-arm/master. > > Amicalement, > Albert. > > The following changes since commit c650e1be41536a453d115e6b73898fa5dabdadc2: > >Fix compile warning in net/eth.c (2011-0

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/7] mpc85xx: Add inline GPIO acessor functions

2011-02-21 Thread Moffett, Kyle D
On Feb 21, 2011, at 16:56, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message you wrote: >> +static inline int gpio_direction_input(unsigned gpio) +{ + mpc85xx_gpio_set_in(1U << gpio); + return 0; +} >>> >>> Why is this function not void when it cannot return any usefult return >>> cod

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 7/7] mpc85xx: Add board support for the eXMeritus HWW-1U-1A devices

2011-02-21 Thread Moffett, Kyle D
On Feb 21, 2011, at 16:47, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <1298311199-18775-8-git-send-email-kyle.d.moff...@boeing.com> you > wrote: >> The eXMeritus HWW-1U-1A unit is a DO-160-certified 13lb 1U chassis >> with 3 independent TEMPEST zones. Two independent P2020 computers may >> be found inside

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/7] powerpc: Minimal private libgcc to build on Debian

2011-02-21 Thread Moffett, Kyle D
On Feb 21, 2011, at 16:23, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <1298311199-18775-6-git-send-email-kyle.d.moff...@boeing.com> you > wrote: >> Standard Debian powerpc and powerpcspe systems only include hard-float >> libgcc in their native compilers, which causes scary build warnings when >> building

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/7] mpc8xxx: DDR2/3: Use human-readable SPD DIMM-type constants

2011-02-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear "Moffett, Kyle D", In message <325e6be9-3fcd-4798-813a-26cd3ccc5...@boeing.com> you wrote: > > > Line too long. Please fix globally. > > Ok, will fix. Although, this one is only 87 characters and some of the = > other lines already in that file are 93 characters long. It would be nice if

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/7] mpc85xx: Add inline GPIO acessor functions

2011-02-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear "Moffett, Kyle D", In message you wrote: > > >> +static inline int gpio_direction_input(unsigned gpio) > >> +{ > >> + mpc85xx_gpio_set_in(1U << gpio); > >> + return 0; > >> +} > > > > Why is this function not void when it cannot return any usefult return > > code anyway? > > > >> +static i

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 7/7] mpc85xx: Add board support for the eXMeritus HWW-1U-1A devices

2011-02-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kyle Moffett, In message <1298311199-18775-8-git-send-email-kyle.d.moff...@boeing.com> you wrote: > The eXMeritus HWW-1U-1A unit is a DO-160-certified 13lb 1U chassis > with 3 independent TEMPEST zones. Two independent P2020 computers may > be found inside each zone. Complete hardware supp

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/7] fdt_support: Fix buffer overflow in fdt_fixup_memory_banks

2011-02-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kyle Moffett, In message <1298311199-18775-7-git-send-email-kyle.d.moff...@boeing.com> you wrote: > When fdt_fixup_memory_banks is called with 2-cell address and size > fields in the device-tree (IE: 64-bit address and size), then it will > overflow its on-stack "tmp" buffer. > > This fixes

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/7] powerpc: Minimal private libgcc to build on Debian

2011-02-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kyle Moffett, In message <1298311199-18775-6-git-send-email-kyle.d.moff...@boeing.com> you wrote: > Standard Debian powerpc and powerpcspe systems only include hard-float > libgcc in their native compilers, which causes scary build warnings when > building U-Boot. > > The easiest way to res

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/7] powerpc: Minimal private libgcc to build on Debian

2011-02-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kyle Moffett, In message <1298311199-18775-6-git-send-email-kyle.d.moff...@boeing.com> you wrote: > Standard Debian powerpc and powerpcspe systems only include hard-float > libgcc in their native compilers, which causes scary build warnings when > building U-Boot. > > The easiest way to res

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/7] fsl_ddr: Don't use full 64-bit divides on 32-bit PowerPC

2011-02-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kyle Moffett, In message <1298311199-18775-5-git-send-email-kyle.d.moff...@boeing.com> you wrote: > The current FreeScale MPC-8xxx DDR SPD interpreter is using full 64-bit > integer divide operations to convert between nanoseconds and DDR clock > cycles given arbitrary DDR clock frequencies.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/7] mpc85xx: Add inline GPIO acessor functions

2011-02-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kyle Moffett, In message <1298311199-18775-4-git-send-email-kyle.d.moff...@boeing.com> you wrote: > To ease the implementation of other MPC85xx board ports, several common > GPIO helpers are added to . In which way is this specific to 85xx? Why not make available on a wider base? > To ass

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/7] mpc8xxx: DDR2/3: Use human-readable SPD DIMM-type constants

2011-02-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kyle Moffett, In message <1298311199-18775-3-git-send-email-kyle.d.moff...@boeing.com> you wrote: > Use #define constants to enhance readability of DDR2/3 SPD parsing code. > Also add the DDR2 type for an SO-RDIMM module to the switch statement. > > Signed-off-by: Kyle Moffett > --- > arc

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/7] mpc85xx: Support a board-specific processor reset routines

2011-02-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kyle Moffett, In message <1298311199-18775-2-git-send-email-kyle.d.moff...@boeing.com> you wrote: > Some board models (such as the submitted P2020-based HWW-1U-1A hardware) > need specialized code to run when a reset is requested to ensure proper > synchronization with other hardware. > > I

Re: [U-Boot] Reading from NAND

2011-02-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear D Kesselring, In message you wrote: > > Is there any reason for not using itest.b directly? > If I do a test on a non-word aligned location the processor gets an exception. You cannot do a byte access on a random address?? Than something is seriously broken in your system. > Also does the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] ARM: Update mach types

2011-02-21 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
> > This commit updates the mach-types to sync with ARM > Linux based on the following commit by Russell King > commit 4a683a2c5e7cabe91218db28e56dc25e1b134ce3 > > Signed-off-by: Jason Liu Already submitted and accepted http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-arm.git;a=commitdiff;h=c7977858dcf1f

Re: [U-Boot] Reading from NAND

2011-02-21 Thread D Kesselring
> Is there any reason for not using itest.b directly? If I do a test on a non-word aligned location the processor gets an exception. Also does the shell support adding values like "itest *(${base} + ${offset}) == 0x01"? Or any other integer addition or subtraction so that a loop can walk an array?

[U-Boot] [PATCH 7/7] mpc85xx: Add board support for the eXMeritus HWW-1U-1A devices

2011-02-21 Thread Kyle Moffett
The eXMeritus HWW-1U-1A unit is a DO-160-certified 13lb 1U chassis with 3 independent TEMPEST zones. Two independent P2020 computers may be found inside each zone. Complete hardware support is included. High-level hardware overview: * DO-160 certified for passenger aircraft (noncritical) * T

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/7] mpc85xx: Add inline GPIO acessor functions

2011-02-21 Thread Kyle Moffett
To ease the implementation of other MPC85xx board ports, several common GPIO helpers are added to . Since each of these compiles to no more than 4-5 instructions it would be very inefficient to call them out of line, therefore we put them entirely in the header file. The HWW-1U-1A board port whic

[U-Boot] [PATCH 6/7] fdt_support: Fix buffer overflow in fdt_fixup_memory_banks

2011-02-21 Thread Kyle Moffett
When fdt_fixup_memory_banks is called with 2-cell address and size fields in the device-tree (IE: 64-bit address and size), then it will overflow its on-stack "tmp" buffer. This fixes the buffer size and adds a comment explaining how many bytes need to be allocated per record. Signed-off-by: Kyle

[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/7] powerpc: Minimal private libgcc to build on Debian

2011-02-21 Thread Kyle Moffett
Standard Debian powerpc and powerpcspe systems only include hard-float libgcc in their native compilers, which causes scary build warnings when building U-Boot. The easiest way to resolve this is to borrow the routines that U-Boot needs from the Linux kernel (GPLv2-licensed), which has the same is

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/7] fsl_ddr: Don't use full 64-bit divides on 32-bit PowerPC

2011-02-21 Thread Kyle Moffett
The current FreeScale MPC-8xxx DDR SPD interpreter is using full 64-bit integer divide operations to convert between nanoseconds and DDR clock cycles given arbitrary DDR clock frequencies. Since all of the inputs to this are 32-bit (nanoseconds, clock cycles, and DDR frequencies), we can easily re

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/7] mpc8xxx: DDR2/3: Use human-readable SPD DIMM-type constants

2011-02-21 Thread Kyle Moffett
Use #define constants to enhance readability of DDR2/3 SPD parsing code. Also add the DDR2 type for an SO-RDIMM module to the switch statement. Signed-off-by: Kyle Moffett --- arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8xxx/ddr/ddr2_dimm_params.c | 34 +++-- arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8xxx/ddr/ddr3_dimm_par

[U-Boot] Support patches for the eXMeritus HWW-1U-1A system (v3)

2011-02-21 Thread Kyle Moffett
Hello again everyone! After a relatively long hiatus working on other projects, I'm resubmitting updated versions of our board-support patches for review and inclusion. This patch series is based off the latest master branch as of Feb 11th, specifically, commit d1a79b71f7c5fd9e277e0feb35f049289df

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/7] mpc85xx: Support a board-specific processor reset routines

2011-02-21 Thread Kyle Moffett
Some board models (such as the submitted P2020-based HWW-1U-1A hardware) need specialized code to run when a reset is requested to ensure proper synchronization with other hardware. In order to facilitate such board ports, we add a board_reset_r() routine which is called from the do_reset() comman

[U-Boot] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: fix email address case

2011-02-21 Thread Fabio Estevam
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam --- MAINTAINERS |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 07541bd..7e987b3 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -624,7 +624,7 @@ Kristoffer Ericson jornada SA1110 -Fabio Estevam +Fa

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] ARM: Update mach types

2011-02-21 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Jason, --- On Mon, 2/21/11, Jason Liu wrote: > From: Jason Liu > Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] ARM: Update mach types > To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > Date: Monday, February 21, 2011, 8:14 AM > This commit updates the mach-types to > sync with ARM > Linux based on the following commit by Russel

[U-Boot] [HELP] Where can i get uboot patch for freescale P4080

2011-02-21 Thread zq_fan
thanks very much ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] ARM: Update mach types

2011-02-21 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
>This commit updates the mach-types to sync with ARM >Linux based on the following commit by Russell King >commit 4a683a2c5e7cabe91218db28e56dc25e1b134ce3 > >Signed-off-by: Jason Liu >--- already done http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-arm.git;a=commitdiff;h=c7977858dcf1f656cbe91ea0dc3cb9139

Re: [U-Boot] SoC specific driver changes through other custodian's trees?

2011-02-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Reinhard Meyer, In message <4d626a18.7030...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote: > > I'm not sure what that means, but the rework effort won't work when not all > required changes are in one tree. And how would, for example, the NET > custodian verify a patch when it would not even build when the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 18/18] Make the at91sam9263ek compile again.

2011-02-21 Thread Andreas Bießmann
Dear Remy Bohmer, Am 21.02.2011 14:09, schrieb Andreas Bießmann: >> >> Enable all the GPIO peripheral clocks in a board_early_init_f() routine. >> Not here. > > No, that is wrong! board_early_init_f() is too late! coloured_LED stuff > is used (currently) in early init stage for debugging. Therefo

Re: [U-Boot] SoC specific driver changes through other custodian's trees?

2011-02-21 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Dear Wolfgang Denk, > Dear Reinhard Meyer, > > In message<4d624a5e.30...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote: >> >>> Please, provide a separate patch for changes in the OHCI drivers. >>> They need to go to the u-boot-usb tree. >> Apart from the fact that no change is required here.. >> >> I don't think

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 18/18] Make the at91sam9263ek compile again.

2011-02-21 Thread Andreas Bießmann
Dear Remy Bohmer, Am 21.02.2011 12:00, schrieb Remy Bohmer: >> diff --git a/board/atmel/at91sam9263ek/led.c >> b/board/atmel/at91sam9263ek/led.c >> index fa1f05b..b3adc51 100644 >> --- a/board/atmel/at91sam9263ek/led.c >> +++ b/board/atmel/at91sam9263ek/led.c >> @@ -23,25 +23,22 @@ >> */ >> >>

Re: [U-Boot] SoC specific driver changes through other custodian's trees?

2011-02-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Reinhard Meyer, In message <4d624a5e.30...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote: > > > Please, provide a separate patch for changes in the OHCI drivers. > > They need to go to the u-boot-usb tree. > Apart from the fact that no change is required here.. > > I don't think it would make sense to let A

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] MX5:MX53: support for freescale MX53LOCO board

2011-02-21 Thread Stefano Babic
On 02/21/2011 11:15 AM, Jason Liu wrote: Hi Jason, > +# > diff --git a/board/freescale/mx53loco/config.mk > b/board/freescale/mx53loco/config.mk > new file mode 100644 > index 000..ec0c66c As I discovered myself, usage

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] cfi_flash: use AMD fixups for AMIC (e.g. A29L160A series) too

2011-02-21 Thread Mario Schuknecht
Signed-off-by: Mario Schuknecht Signed-off-by: Steffen Sledz --- drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c |3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c b/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c index dd394a8..527a3a5 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/cfi_

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] cfi_flash: use AMD fixups for AMIC (e.g. A29L160A series) too

2011-02-21 Thread Steffen Sledz
Am 21.02.2011 11:14, schrieb Stefan Roese: > Hi Steffen, > > On Monday 21 February 2011 09:30:35 Steffen Sledz wrote: >> Am 11.02.2011 15:30, schrieb Steffen Sledz: >>> Signed-off-by: Mario Schuknecht >>> Signed-off-by: Steffen Sledz >>> ... >> Ping! > > This patch is not really a bug-fix. So I

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 18/18] Make the at91sam9263ek compile again.

2011-02-21 Thread Remy Bohmer
Hi, 2011/2/21 Uli Raich : > This version has been tested on an > armputer-vmax board, which is similar to the at91sam9263ek > but not on the at91sam9263ek board itself. > A new configuration "armputer-vmax_config" has been added. This configuration > has been tested on the hardware and is known to

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 18/18] Make the at91sam9263ek compile again.

2011-02-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Uli Raich, In message <0f3ef05ca2a70e43b140ef090b9f97183efe0...@cernxchg22.cern.ch> you wrote: > This version has been tested on an > armputer-vmax board, which is similar to the at91sam9263ek > but not on the at91sam9263ek board itself. > A new configuration "armputer-vmax_config" has been

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 18/18] Make the at91sam9263ek compile again.

2011-02-21 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Dear Uli Raich, > This version has been tested on an > armputer-vmax board, which is similar to the at91sam9263ek > but not on the at91sam9263ek board itself. > A new configuration "armputer-vmax_config" has been added. This configuration > has been tested on the hardware and is known to work. Furt

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] ARM: Update mach types

2011-02-21 Thread Jason Liu
This commit updates the mach-types to sync with ARM Linux based on the following commit by Russell King commit 4a683a2c5e7cabe91218db28e56dc25e1b134ce3 Signed-off-by: Jason Liu --- arch/arm/include/asm/mach-types.h | 1293 - 1 files changed, 1277 insertions(+)

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] MX5: Enable flat-device-tree support on mx51/53 evk board

2011-02-21 Thread Jason Liu
device tree for uboot arm support has already been enabled in the master branch. This patch enable device tree support for mx51/53 evk board for DT test. Signed-off-by: Jason Liu --- include/configs/mx51evk.h |3 +++ include/configs/mx53evk.h |3 +++ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 d

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] MX5:MX53: support for freescale MX53LOCO board

2011-02-21 Thread Jason Liu
This patch add initial support for freescale MX53LOCO board. Network(FEC),SD/MMC, UART have been supported by this patch. Signed-off-by: Jason Liu --- MAINTAINERS |1 + board/freescale/mx53loco/Makefile | 46 + board/freescale/mx53loco/config.mk| 24

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH] ARMV7: Patch to fix hard float build issues

2011-02-21 Thread Raghuveer Murthy
On Sunday 20 February 2011 01:25 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Raghuveer Murthy, > > In message<1298042212-12260-1-git-send-email-raghuveer.mur...@ti.com> you > wrote: >> U-boot built for MeeGo on PandaBoard, with compiler option >> -mfloat-abi=hard, caused a build break. Please refer to the bu

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] cfi_flash: use AMD fixups for AMIC (e.g. A29L160A series) too

2011-02-21 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Steffen, On Monday 21 February 2011 09:30:35 Steffen Sledz wrote: > Am 11.02.2011 15:30, schrieb Steffen Sledz: > > Signed-off-by: Mario Schuknecht > > Signed-off-by: Steffen Sledz > > --- > > > > drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c |3 ++- > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > >

[U-Boot] [PATCH 18/18] Make the at91sam9263ek compile again.

2011-02-21 Thread Uli Raich
This version has been tested on an armputer-vmax board, which is similar to the at91sam9263ek but not on the at91sam9263ek board itself. A new configuration "armputer-vmax_config" has been added. This configuration has been tested on the hardware and is known to work. Further hardware tests for ind

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot for x86 Core2Duo target

2011-02-21 Thread Andy Pont
Zvi wrote... > On my next project, the target is Core2Duo (AMPRO's COM840). > > Is it a wise decision to use u-boot on this target ? Probably not! Ampro will already have invested a lot of time and effort in porting the BIOS to that board and are giving you a device that works out of the box.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] cfi_flash: use AMD fixups for AMIC (e.g. A29L160A series) too

2011-02-21 Thread Steffen Sledz
Am 11.02.2011 15:30, schrieb Steffen Sledz: > Signed-off-by: Mario Schuknecht > Signed-off-by: Steffen Sledz > --- > drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c |3 ++- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c b/drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c > index dd394a8..527a3a5

Re: [U-Boot] some question

2011-02-21 Thread Alexandre Gambier
Hello, Booting using the fdt blob at 0xc0 Uncompressing Kernel Image ... out of func inflateInit2 I backtraced the contents dumped and I found it died in function "inflate" which is defined in the file of lib/zlib.c and called in the file of lib/gunzip.c.But after that I don't kno