Re: [U-Boot] OpenRD-{Client,Ultimate}

Hi Clint, Le 25/03/2011 03:21, Clint Adams a écrit : > What is the status of the OpenRD-Ultimate support discussed last summer? AFAIK, there were patch proposals but no final patch. Feel free to look up the list archives, find the last post and bump the topic up by responding to it, Cc:ing rele

Re: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-samsung/master

Le 25/03/2011 03:02, Minkyu Kang a écrit : > Dear Albert ARIBAUD, > > 2011-03-24 오후 10:57, Albert ARIBAUD 쓴 글: >> Le 24/03/2011 07:58, Minkyu Kang a écrit : >>> Dear Albert Aribaud, >>> >>> The following changes since commit 966a35d45b90fdcd694dec89b32e5b67771cfd64: >>> >>> Merge branch 'maste

[U-Boot] [PATCH V6 2/4] SMDK2410: remove unneeded config.mk

Signed-off-by: David Müller --- board/samsung/smdk2410/config.mk | 25 - include/configs/smdk2410.h |2 ++ 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 board/samsung/smdk2410/config.mk diff --git a/board/samsung/smdk2410/config.mk b/

[U-Boot] [PATCH V6 3/4] SMDK2410: use the CFI driver (and remove the old one)

Signed-off-by: David Müller --- board/samsung/smdk2410/Makefile |2 +- board/samsung/smdk2410/flash.c| 433 - board/samsung/smdk2410/smdk2410.c | 12 + include/configs/smdk2410.h| 32 +-- 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 454 deletions

[U-Boot] [PATCH V6 1/4] SMDK2410: activate ARM relocation feature

Signed-off-by: David Müller --- include/configs/smdk2410.h |6 ++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/smdk2410.h b/include/configs/smdk2410.h index 62fe97e..17038f5 100644 --- a/include/configs/smdk2410.h +++ b/include/configs/smdk2410.h @@ -17

[U-Boot] [PATCH V6 0/4] update SMDK2410 port

This patch serie brings the SMDK2410 port in sync with the latest U-Boot version by doing the following: - do the necessary adjustments to support the ARM relocation feature - use the CFI flash driver (and removing the old one) - remove the unneeded config.mk file - various cleanups/code style

[U-Boot] [PATCH V6 4/4] SMDK2410: various cleanup/code style fixes

Signed-off-by: David Müller --- board/samsung/smdk2410/smdk2410.c | 61 +--- include/configs/smdk2410.h| 145 ++--- 2 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-) diff --git a/board/samsung/smdk2410/smdk2410.c b/board/samsung/smdk241

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ftsmc020: enhance for features and asm support.

Hi Wolfgnag > In message > <1300965924-20508-1-git-send-email-macp...@andestech.com> you wrote: > > 1. Enhance ftsmc020 according to datasheets. > > 2. Add assembly register offsets for support lowlevel_init.S. > > NAK. Such register offsets should be automatically generated from the > respecti

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/4] Kirkwood: Add support for OpenRD-Client & OpenRD-Ultimate

From: Julian Pidancet This patch modifies existing OpenRD-Base support to deal with all the three OpenRD boards (OpenRD-Base, OpenRD-Client & OpenRD-Ultimate). This is based on an original patch sent by Tanmay Upadhyay. Most of the credits goes to him. Previous version of this patch has been rewo

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/4] Kirkwood: Rename openrd_base board files to openrd.

From: Julian Pidancet This patch renames openrd_base to openrd in order to add support for other boards of the OpenRD family in future commits. The openrd_base board name remain in use. Signed-off-by: Julian Pidancet rename board/Marvell/{openrd_base => openrd}/Makefile (98%) rename board/Ma

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/4] Change OpenRD Base board identification string.

From: Julian Pidancet Renamed from "Openrd_base" to "OpenRD-Base" Signed-off-by: Julian Pidancet diff --git a/include/configs/openrd_base.h b/include/configs/openrd_base.h index 136d3bf..ba57d90 100644 --- a/include/configs/openrd_base.h +++ b/include/configs/openrd_base.h @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ /

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/4] Add support for the Client variant of the OpenRD board.

From: Julian Pidancet This patch takes care of initializing the second PHY of the OpenRD board. Signed-off-by: Julian Pidancet create mode 100644 include/configs/openrd_client.h diff --git a/MAKEALL b/MAKEALL index a732e6a..ddf4a70 100755 --- a/MAKEALL +++ b/MAKEALL @@ -361,6 +361,7 @@ LIST_

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/4] Add support for the Ultimate variant of the OpenRD board

From: Julian Pidancet This patch adds proper initialization code for the two PHYs present on the board. Signed-off-by: Julian Pidancet create mode 100644 include/configs/openrd_ultimate.h diff --git a/MAKEALL b/MAKEALL index ddf4a70..4b6da98 100755 --- a/MAKEALL +++ b/MAKEALL @@ -362,6 +362,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ftsmc020: enhance for features and asm support.

Dear macp...@andestech.com, In message <50fd90c65c53fb45badeebcd84ff07f202ec0...@atcpcs06.andestech.com> you wrote: > > > Neither I ran the command > > "tools/scripts/make-asm-offsets include/faraday/ftsmc020.h > include/faraday/ftsmc020-genasm.h" > nor I ran > sed -ne "/^->/{s:->#\(.*\):/* \1 *

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v6 7/7] modify files for ben nanonote board

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/15/2011 11:16 AM, Shinya Kuribayashi wrote: > You added targets with the same name to two places. In this case, > boards.cfg will be used to configure qi_lb60. All MIPS targets can > be configured through boards.cfg now, so please 1) remove $(T

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v6 4/7] jz4740 nand driver

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/08/2011 07:44 AM, Scott Wood wrote: > You don't set nand->options... > > Don't you want a bad block table? > hmm... some question. a little confuse. 1. I using all rest of nand as rootfs partition. do I have keep some space in nand for BBT

[U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-samsung/master

Dear Albert ARIBAUD, I rebased u-boot-samsung/master. Please pull. The following changes since commit be7e8b604c88a2f85fbc25e383ba8fa83a5fe71c: Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arm into arm (2011-03-25 17:32:46 +0900) are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx53loco: set mmc env to MMC slot1

On 03/22/2011 08:45 AM, Jason Liu wrote: > mx53loco board has two MMC slots, one is for MicroSD, > the other one is for normal SD, but the final board > design is to only boot from MicroSD. So, make the mmc > env default to slot1(MicroSD slot) > > Signed-off-by: Jason Liu > --- Applied to u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] OpenRD-{Client,Ultimate}

> -Original Message- > From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] > On Behalf Of Albert ARIBAUD > Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 12:33 PM > To: Clint Adams > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] OpenRD-{Client,Ultimate} > > Hi Clint, > > Le 25/03/

[U-Boot] (no subject)

I have a foundation/Estate uncompleted {valued at USD 2,142,728.00} and need you to help me finish it because of my health, Everything is available. Please contact me for more details thank you.(elizabeth.stev...@admin.in.th). E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] arm: provide a CONFIG flag for disabling relocation

Relocation may not be needed and desirable in many cases: * For many boards the amount of SDRAM is fixed. So relocation is not needed. * Relocation adds un-necessary additional overhead when it's not needed. This delay is singificant on slower platforms such as FPGA * Many boards have a

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] arm: provide a CONFIG flag for disabling relocation

Forgot to mention that this patch depends on my previous series for MMC spl: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/96352 This one was anyway intended to initiate the discussion. If approved, I shall create a cleaner patch. On Friday 25 March 2011 06:42 PM, Aneesh V wrote: > Relo

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Fix PCI memory map setup on P1_P2_RDB

On Mar 24, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: > From: Prabhakar Kushwaha > > Update the PCIe address map to match standard FSL memory map. > Additionally, fix the TLBs so the cover the PCIe address space properly > so cards plugged in like an e1000 work correctly. > > Signed-off-by: Prabhakar

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v6 01/13] nds32: add header files support for nds32

Hi Wolfgang, 2011/3/25 Wolfgang Denk : > Dear Macpaul Lin, > > please keep the list on Cc: > >> I did run checkpatch, >> However, "some of these files" comes from Linux kernel header. > > Well, the checkpatch comes from Linux, so your files violate the Linux > kernel coding style in the first plac

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Enable various errata on P1022/P1013 SoCs

On Mar 6, 2011, at 10:15 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > From: Jiang Yutang > > Enable workaround for errata ELBC A001, ESDHC 111 & SATA A001 on > P1022/P1013 SoCs. > > Also updated P1022DS config to properly enable CONFIG_FSL_SATA_V2. > > Signed-off-by: Jiang Yutang > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala > -

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/6] powerpc/85xx: Add 36-bit address map support to P1022DS

On Mar 6, 2011, at 10:17 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > From: Jiang Yutang > > Signed-off-by: Jiang Yutang > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala > --- > board/freescale/p1022ds/p1022ds.c |3 ++ > boards.cfg|1 + > include/configs/P1022DS.h | 46 +

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Adds some P1010/P1014 SoC configuration defines

On Mar 6, 2011, at 10:15 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > From: Poonam Aggrwal > > Add defines for FSL_SATA_V2, # of DDR controllers, reset value of CCSRBAR > and SDHC erratum. > > Signed-off-by: Poonam Aggrwal > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala > --- > arch/powerpc/include/asm/config_mpc85xx.h |8 +

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Specify CONFIG_SYS_FM_MURAM_SIZE

On Mar 6, 2011, at 10:15 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > CONFIG_SYS_FM_MURAM_SIZE varies from SoC to SoC to specify it in > config_mpc85xx.h for those parts with a Frame Manager. > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala > --- > arch/powerpc/include/asm/config_mpc85xx.h |8 > 1 files changed, 8 inserti

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Corrected sdhc clock value for P1010

On Mar 6, 2011, at 10:15 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > From: Priyanka Jain > > SDHC clock is equal to CCB on P1010 and P1014 not CCB/2. > > Signed-off-by: Priyanka Jain > Signed-off-by: Poonam Aggrwal > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala > --- > arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/speed.c |3 ++- > 1 files change

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Support for Freescale P1024/P1025 processor

On Mar 6, 2011, at 10:15 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > Add Support for Freescale P1024/P1025 (dual core) and > P1015/P1016 (single core) processors. > > P1024 is a variant of P1020 processor with a core frequency from > 400Mhz to 667Mhz and comes in a 561-pin wirebond power-BGA > > P1025 is a variant

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fsl: obsolete NXID v0 EEPROMs, automatically upgrade them to NXID v1

On Mar 6, 2011, at 10:16 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > From: Timur Tabi > > The NXID EEPROM format comes in two versions, v0 and v1. The only > difference is in the number of MAC addresses that can be stored. NXID v0 > supports eight addresses, and NXID v1 supports 23. > > Rather than allow a boar

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Removed clearing of L2-as-SRAM

At 12:59 14.02.2011 +0100, Fabian Cenedese wrote: >Removed clearing of L2 cache as SRAM as it is not necessary without ECC. >This also speeds up the booting process. > >Signed-off-by: Fabian Cenedese >Cc: Kumar Gala >--- > arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init_nand.c |7 --- > 1 files changed,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/8xxx: Reduce NAND-SPL build size

On Mar 6, 2011, at 10:16 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > We don't use disable_law in the SPL code so only build it if > !CONFIG_NAND_SPL. > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala > --- > drivers/misc/fsl_law.c |2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) not need, fixed by --gc-sections / -ffunct

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5] powerpc/85xx: Use DDR for RAMBOOT instead of L2 SRAM on p1_p2_rdb

On Mar 6, 2011, at 10:17 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > From: Priyanka Jain > > Using DDR as RAMBOOT base instead of L2SRAM for SDCard and SPI Flash > boot loaders because: > - P1_P2_RDB boards have soldered DDR so no need for SPD > - Also P102x has 256K L2 cache size so becomes a limiting factor for

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] powerpc/85xx: Read board switch settings on p1_p2_rdb

On Mar 6, 2011, at 10:17 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > From: Priyanka Jain > > PCA9557 is parallel I/O expansion device on I2C bus which stores various > board switch settings like NOR Flash-Bank selection, SD Data width. > > On board: > switch SW5[6] is to select width for eSDHC >ON - 4-bi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] powerpc/85xx: Removed P1/P2 RDB RevB support

On Mar 6, 2011, at 10:17 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > From: Poonam Aggrwal > > RevB boards never really made it outside of Freescale and have been > replaced with RevC & RevD which had various board bug fixes. > > Signed-off-by: Poonam Aggrwal > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala > --- > board/freescale/p

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5] powerpc/85xx: Optimized DDR settings for 800MT/s on P1/P2 RDB

On Mar 6, 2011, at 10:17 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > From: Poonam Aggrwal > > Changed the following DDR timing parameters for 800Mt/s: > tRRTBL/2+1 to BL/2 > tWWTBL/2+1 to BL/2 > tWRTBL/2+1 to BL/2 > tRWTBL/2+1 to BL/2 > REFINT 6500ns to 7800ns > > Signed-off-by: Poonam Aggrw

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Fix determining Fman freq on P1023

On Mar 13, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: > On the P1023 the Fman freq is equivalent to the system bus freq, not 1/2 > of it. Also we only have one Fman so no need for the code to deal with > a second. > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala > --- > arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/speed.c |5 + >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Fixup determining PME, FMan freq

On Mar 6, 2011, at 10:47 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > On CoreNet based SoCs (P2040, P3041, P4080, P5020) we have some > additional rules to determining the various frequencies that PME & FMan > IP blocks run at. > > We need to take into account: > * Reduced number of Core Complex PLL clusters > * HWA

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] arm: provide a CONFIG flag for disabling relocation

Dear Aneesh V, In message <1301058732-30898-1-git-send-email-ane...@ti.com> you wrote: > Relocation may not be needed and desirable in many cases: > * For many boards the amount of SDRAM is fixed. >So relocation is not needed. This is plain wrong. This has been explained a couple of times b

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Removed clearing of L2-as-SRAM

On Mar 25, 2011, at 8:43 AM, Fabian Cenedese wrote: > At 12:59 14.02.2011 +0100, Fabian Cenedese wrote: >> Removed clearing of L2 cache as SRAM as it is not necessary without ECC. >> This also speeds up the booting process. >> >> Signed-off-by: Fabian Cenedese >> Cc: Kumar Gala >> --- >> arch/

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] arm: Tegra2: add support for A9 CPU init

Hi Tom, Things look pretty good. Minor comments/questions below. > +/* > + * TBD: Move cold_boot() to assembly file. > + * Values/offsets of the table vars make this difficult. > + */ > + > +void cold_boot(void) > +{ > + asm volatile( > + "msrcpsr_c, #0xD3 \n" > +

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v6 4/7] jz4740 nand driver

On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:17:17 +0800 Xiangfu Liu wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/08/2011 07:44 AM, Scott Wood wrote: > > You don't set nand->options... > > > > Don't you want a bad block table? > > > > hmm... some question. a little confuse. > > 1. I using al

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] arm: provide a CONFIG flag for disabling relocation

Dear Wolfgang, On Friday 25 March 2011 07:42 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Aneesh V, > > In message<1301058732-30898-1-git-send-email-ane...@ti.com> you wrote: >> Relocation may not be needed and desirable in many cases: >> * For many boards the amount of SDRAM is fixed. >> So relocation

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] arm: Tegra2: add support for A9 CPU init

Peter, On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Peter Tyser wrote: > Hi Tom, > Things look pretty good.  Minor comments/questions below. > > > >> +/* >> + * TBD: Move cold_boot() to assembly file. >> + * Values/offsets of the table vars make this difficult. >> + */ >> + >> +void cold_boot(void) >> +{ >>

[U-Boot] [PATCH V3] arm: Tegra2: add support for A9 CPU init

Signed-off-by: Tom Warren --- Changes for V2: - Remove returns in void functions - Move inline assembly code to .S file - Simplify some if/else code, break out common code - Minimize the use of local vars - Inline some single-instance functions - Rem

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] arm: Tegra2: add support for A9 CPU init

On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 09:16 -0700, Tom Warren wrote: > Peter, > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Peter Tyser wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > Things look pretty good. Minor comments/questions below. > > > > > > > >> +/* > >> + * TBD: Move cold_boot() to assembly file. > >> + * Values/offsets of the tab

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] arm: Tegra2: add support for A9 CPU init

Peter, On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Peter Tyser wrote: > On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 09:16 -0700, Tom Warren wrote: >> Peter, >> >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Peter Tyser wrote: >> > Hi Tom, >> > Things look pretty good.  Minor comments/questions below. >> > >> > >> > >> >> +/* >> >> + * T

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] arm: provide a CONFIG flag for disabling relocation

Le 25/03/2011 17:12, Aneesh V a écrit : > Another problem I have with relocation is that it makes debugging with > JTAG debugers more difficult. The addresses of symbols in the ELF > target are no longer valid. Of course, you can load the symbols at an > offset from the original location. But one

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3] arm: Tegra2: add support for A9 CPU init

Le 25/03/2011 18:06, Tom Warren a écrit : > Signed-off-by: Tom Warren > --- > Changes for V2: > - Remove returns in void functions > - Move inline assembly code to .S file > - Simplify some if/else code, break out common code > - Minimize the use of local vars > - Inli

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] usb: musb: blackfin: check anomaly workarounds at runtime too

Hi, 2011/3/17 Mike Frysinger : > The anomaly workarounds we need for older silicon might break things > if used on newer versions where the anomalies don't exist.  So check > the silicon rev at runtime too. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger > --- >  drivers/usb/musb/blackfin_usb.c |   29

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] usb: musb: blackfin: make clkin configurable

Hi, 2011/3/17 Mike Frysinger : > Not everyone has a 24MHz clkin to the USB, so let board porters override. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger > --- >  drivers/usb/musb/blackfin_usb.c |    7 ++- >  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > Applied to u-boot-usb Thanks. Remy

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Remove unnecessary reset in usb_stor_get_info

Hi, 2011/3/24 Erik Hansen : > The reset request in usb_stor_get_info is causing issues with some usb > sticks. Some of these sticks vendor_id/product_id have been hardcoded to > not reset but better is to remove the reset altogether. It is not needed. > > Signed-off-by: Erik Hansen > --- >  commo

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fat32 root directory handling

Hi Wolfgang, 2011/3/24 Erik Hansen : > Fat directory handling didn't check reaching the end of the root directory. It > relied on a stop condition based on a directory entry with a name starting > with > a '\0' character. This check in itself is wrong ('\0' indicates free entry, > not > end_of_d

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] arm: Tegra2: add support for A9 CPU init

On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 11:05 -0700, Tom Warren wrote: > Peter, > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Peter Tyser wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 09:16 -0700, Tom Warren wrote: > >> Peter, > >> > >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Peter Tyser wrote: > >> > Hi Tom, > >> > Things look pretty good.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/4] Kirkwood: Add support for OpenRD-Client & OpenRD-Ultimate

Julian Pidancet wrote: > A nice future improvement would be to add variant detection and configuration > at run-time as suggested on the mailing-list in a recent email. So one could > use the same binary for all board variants. Does anyone know offhand how to do this? I have heard rumors of a GPI

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] arm: Tegra2: add support for A9 CPU init

> FWIW, I spent _far_ more than 30 minutes on this .. close to a full > day of frustration/banging my head against the wall. [...] I understand the feeling. I'm one of those who suggested (but not required) to put full-asm function in .S files for a reason; I personally think the reboot code may

Re: [U-Boot] CFI flash broken for 8-bit bus

I am still doing some testing and just added a fix today so that if a flash chip that supports both 8 and 16-bits is on an 8-bit bus the interface is set to 8-bits. I'll try and get patches out next week. So far it's working fairly well on all of our boards, most of which have an 8- bit bus but