Add support for SERIAL MULTI for uartlite.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek
---
v2: Use in/out_be32 functions
v3: Clean coding style
v4: Simplify userial_ports array initialization
v5: const userial_ports
Do not use u32
Separate declarations and code by a single blank line
Update copyr
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <201109252341.30328.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> > The assigned variable can be removed because the pointers are volatile so
> > accesses to their addresses are always generated.
>
> i think the stores to a var were added to avoid a gcc warning, but if newer
The code had two paths depending on whether the card was to be
accessed from plain memory or the IO region. However the error
path checks whether IO region was obtained - twice. Fix up the
error path according to the probable intention.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij
---
drivers/net/dc2114x.c |
Heiko,
I am looking forward to see these patches in mainline u-boot. My
custom board also directly boots from NOR, so I think there is a lot I
can re-use for my board.
I have one question, please see below:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher
>
The framebuffer driver for MX5 is based on CONFIG_LCD.
In the current implementation, there is a serious bug
because the required memory is allocated before
relocation, but the driver knows only later which is
the resolution of the display. The patch switches the driver
to CONFIG_VIDEO and the memo
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic
CC: Anatolij Gustschin
---
board/ttcontrol/vision2/vision2.c | 36 +---
include/configs/vision2.h | 11 +--
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/ttcontrol/vision2/vision2.c
b/board
How i cat apply this patch u-boot-v2009.08-imx_10.11.01 for another version
u-boot. For example for last version u-boot-2011.09-rc1 ?
patch in attach.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Georgy Obraztsov wrote:
> Because in old version (u-boot-2009.08-rc3) i can apply specific board
> patch for u-b
Why don´t you just resend my original patch (put my name in the From:
> field) as part of this series?
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/109335
>
Thanks, I'll be glad to use it.
Regards,
Jana Rapava
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Bo
Hello Christian,
Christian Riesch wrote:
> Heiko,
> I am looking forward to see these patches in mainline u-boot. My
> custom board also directly boots from NOR, so I think there is a lot I
> can re-use for my board.
Thats the goal ;-)
> I have one question, please see below:
[...]
>> +void am18
On 09/23/2011 07:22 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 09/23/2011 11:36 AM, Simon Schwarz wrote:
>> Added a nand_base.h header that defines all prototypes of nand_base.c
>> functions.
>
> Just add the new prototypes to include/linux/mtd/nand.h (which gets
> included by nand.h), that's the header that goes
On 09/25/2011 10:03 PM, dtran11 wrote:
>
> I am trying to make uboot boot as fast as possible for my omap3 Overo board.
> I add the below to my config header file. Does anyone see anything I can add
> to it to make the build smaller and faster? Thank you.
>
>
[SNIP]
This may be of interest to you
On Monday, September 26, 2011 09:25:36 AM Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Mike Frysinger,
>
> In message <201109252341.30328.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
> > > The assigned variable can be removed because the pointers are volatile
> > > so accesses to their addresses are always generated.
> >
> > i
On Monday, September 26, 2011 04:39:42 AM Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Fixes problems similar to the following ones:
> >
> > cmd_date.c: In function ‘do_date’:
> > cmd_date.c:50:6: warning: variable ‘old_bus’ set but not used
> > [-Wunused-but-set
On 26/09/11 03:06, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/io.h | 30 ++
> 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h
> index 1fbc531..61f4987 100644
>
Michal Simek wrote:
> Add axi_ethernet driver for little-endian Microblaze.
>
> RX/TX BDs and rxframe buffer are shared among all axi_ethernet MACs.
> Only one MAC can work in one time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek
>
> ---
>
> v2: Fix cammelcase weirdness
> Create mdio_wait function wit
On 09/26/2011 10:27 AM, Georgy Obraztsov wrote:
> How i cat apply this patch u-boot-v2009.08-imx_10.11.01 for another
> version u-boot. For example for last version u-boot-2011.09-rc1 ?
Patches are always suitable for one version only - you have to port the
patch (I have not seen it, it was missin
On Monday, September 26, 2011 11:26:51 AM Nick Thompson wrote:
> On 26/09/11 03:06, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
> > ---
> >
> > arch/arm/include/asm/io.h | 30 ++
> > 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch
On 26/09/11 10:32, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Monday, September 26, 2011 11:26:51 AM Nick Thompson wrote:
>> On 26/09/11 03:06, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
>>> ---
>>>
>>> arch/arm/include/asm/io.h | 30 ++
>>> 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 12
On Monday, September 26, 2011 11:44:22 AM Nick Thompson wrote:
> On 26/09/11 10:32, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Monday, September 26, 2011 11:26:51 AM Nick Thompson wrote:
> >> On 26/09/11 03:06, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> arch/arm/include/asm/io.h |
On 09/25/2011 09:55 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
> Cc: Stefano Babic
> ---
> board/efikamx/efikamx.c | 124
> -
> include/configs/efikamx.h |4 ++
> 2 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> V2: Introduce m
On 09/25/2011 09:52 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
> Cc: Stefano Babic
> ---
> MAINTAINERS |1 +
> board/efikamx/imximage.cfg| 122
> -
> board/efikamx/imximage_mx.cfg | 122
> +
Hi Simon,
Le 25/09/2011 16:50, Simon Glass a écrit :
>> Basically, printf family functions which do not have the 'n' are *know* by
>> all -- experienced enough :) -- programmers to be *unsafe* (but to require
>> less from the caller) and it should remain so: no programmer should ever
>> encounter
On 09/26/2011 12:15 PM, Georgy Obraztsov wrote:
> Ok. I do queston another words.
Please stop sending only private e-mails. You must *always* send your
question to the ML, too.
> I have i.mx51 processor with Compact Flash interface connected. How i
> can compile u-boot for this configuration. U-b
Hi Sandeep,
Le 23/09/2011 22:58, s-paul...@ti.com a écrit :
> Albert,
>
> Please pull u-boot-ti/next into arm/next
> I checked all the patches i applied for checkpatch errors and saw 2, both
> of which cannot be fixed. Checkpatch complained about the location of the
> header file. It expects thing
Dear Marek Vasut,
In message <201109261104.13082.marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> > Your commit log does not match your patch.
>
> "Fixes problems similar to the following ones" ... why not ?
Please show _exactly_ which problems the patch fixes.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Softw
Dear Marek Vasut,
In message <201109261132.43616.marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> > Would it be better to change the __arch_putb macro into an extern inline
> > function instead which would catch these and future cases?
>
> Yes, but you'll need to do that on a much larger scale. Is anyone up
Hi Albert,
please pull u-boot-imx/next (already rebased on u-boot-arm/next after
you merged u-boot-ti) into your u-boot-arm/next.
Best regards,
Stefano
The following changes since commit f3340eeaf574b3297e801a563089c90d23e84f8d:
arm, davinci, da8xx: add cpuinfo (2011-09-23 15:50:39 -0400)
ar
patches are checkpatch clean, and a "MAKEALL -c mpc83xx"
compiles clean.
Heiko Schocher (2):
cosmetic, powerpc, mpc83xx: checkpatch cleanup
powerpc, mpc83xx: add DDR SDRAM Timing Configuration 3 definitions
Cc: Kim Phillips
include/mpc83xx.h | 394 +++--
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher
Cc: Kim Phillips
---
include/mpc83xx.h |5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/mpc83xx.h b/include/mpc83xx.h
index d345c85..881fd43 100644
--- a/include/mpc83xx.h
+++ b/include/mpc83xx.h
@@ -1054,6 +1054,11 @@
#define TI
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher
Cc: Kim Phillips
---
include/mpc83xx.h | 389 +++--
1 files changed, 257 insertions(+), 132 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/mpc83xx.h b/include/mpc83xx.h
index 8292018..d345c85 100644
--- a/include/mpc83xx.h
+++ b/
Hello,
Le Fri, 2 Sep 2011 10:48:03 +0200,
David Wagner a écrit :
> +"-s -o \n"
^^ typo
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
__
What does SPL stand for again? It looks really interesting.
Thanks.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:56 AM, Simon Schwarz <
simonschwarz...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 09/25/2011 10:03 PM, dtran11 wrote:
>
>>
>> I am trying to make uboot boot as fast as possible for my omap3 Overo
>> board.
>> I add th
Stands for Second Program Loader.
It loads the U-Boot and runs it - or with this patch a Linux Kernel.
Regards
Simon
On 09/26/2011 02:30 PM, Dat Tran wrote:
> What does SPL stand for again? It looks really interesting.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:56 AM, Simon Schwarz
> mailto:simon
This tool takes a key=value configuration file (same as would a `printenv' show)
and generates the corresponding environment image, ready to be flashed.
use case: flash the environment with an external tool
Signed-off-by: David Wagner
Acked-by; Mike Frysinger
Tested-by: Thomas Petazzoni
---
>
> Hi Sandeep,
>
> Le 23/09/2011 22:58, s-paul...@ti.com a écrit :
> > Albert,
> >
> > Please pull u-boot-ti/next into arm/next
> > I checked all the patches i applied for checkpatch errors and saw 2,
> both
> > of which cannot be fixed. Checkpatch complained about the location of
> the
> > he
On 09/23/2011 08:47 AM, Holger Brunck wrote:
> This prevents u-boot to display during bootime:
> Out: serial
> Err: serial
> Net: UEC3Warning: failed to set MAC address
>
> Now corrected and it will display:
> Out: serial
> Err: serial
> Net: UEC3
> Warning: failed to set MAC address
>
Sorry for my ignorance on this issue. My current system (Overo) does this
when it boots:
ROM Code -> X-Load (MLO) -> U-Boot -> Linux Kernel -> Root File System
Does the SPL patch allow me to do this?:
ROM Code -> U-Boot (MLO) -> Linux Kernel -> Root File System
Also running the latest
This patch series adds new generic PMIC framework for u-boot.
It is supposed to handle various types of pmic IC's (both
I2C and SPI).
This patch series has been tested on Samsung's GONI reference target.
Moreover a special patch for mx51evk target board has been prepared.
It is compiling, but I c
The pmic_init() initialization handler has been added to
board_init_r function.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
Cc: Stefano Babic
---
arch/arm/lib/board.c |5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/board.c b/arch/arm/li
This commit adds new PMIC core driver.
PMIC IC devices connected via I2C or SPI can be used.
Separate files: pmic_i2c.c and pmic_spi.c are responsible
for handling transmission specific files for I2C or SPI busses.
pmic_fsl.c and pmic_max8998.c are PMIC specific files. They define
pmic_init() met
This is an example code for adjusting the mx51evk example board to
new pmic_core driver.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
Cc: Stefano Babic
---
board/freescale/mx51evk/mx51evk.c | 68 +
1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 22 delet
Hi List,
> > I am looking for a u-boot that handles SquashFS filesystem ?
> > Did it exist ? if not can I have some indication or recommendation
> > Because I want to try to upgrade u-boot such that it handles SquashFS
>
> Tuxbox has such an u-boot version, see:
> http://cvs.tuxbox.org/cgi-bin/vi
On 09/26/2011 04:30 PM, Dat Tran wrote:
> Sorry for my ignorance on this issue. My current system (Overo) does
> this when it boots:
>
> ROM Code -> X-Load (MLO) -> U-Boot -> Linux Kernel -> Root File System
>
> Does the SPL patch allow me to do this?:
>
> ROM Code -> U-Boot (MLO) -> Linu
On Monday, September 26, 2011 10:24:54 Philip Balister wrote:
> On 09/23/2011 08:47 AM, Holger Brunck wrote:
> > This prevents u-boot to display during bootime:
> > Out: serial
> > Err: serial
> > Net: UEC3Warning: failed to set MAC address
> >
> > Now corrected and it will display:
> > Out:
On Monday, September 26, 2011 02:08:51 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > This pushes the ugly duplicated arch ifdef lists we maintain in various
> > image related files out to the arch headers themselves.
>
> I appreciate this change in general, but ...
>
> ...
>
> > -#else
> > -#
On Monday, September 26, 2011 05:03:46 Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Monday, September 26, 2011 09:25:36 AM Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > The assigned variable can be removed because the pointers are
> > > > volatile so accesses to their addresses are always generated.
> > >
> >
That is amazing. I have been looking for this type of project for a long
time. Thank you very much. I will start to look at your patches. Will the
patches work well with the newer versions like U-Boot 2011.09 or later, or
is there a more specific version you recommend. Thanks.
On Mon, Sep 26, 201
Thanks for the reply.
I was in the process updating ELDK from 4.1 to 4.2 and must have had
something screwed up. I tried again Today and it compiles without error.
Thanks for looking into this and helping a newbie.
Brian
On 9/24/2011 3:05 AM, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 23 Sep 201
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 22:11:34 +0200
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Kim Phillips,
>
> In message <20110923140020.1eac241b.kim.phill...@freescale.com> you wrote:
> >
> > > Can you explain this in a bit more detail.
> >
> > if, for whatever reason, the nfsboot env var has been
> > modified/deleted, on
On 09/26/2011 06:07 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday, September 26, 2011 10:24:54 Philip Balister wrote:
>> On 09/23/2011 08:47 AM, Holger Brunck wrote:
>>> This prevents u-boot to display during bootime:
>>> Out: serial
>>> Err: serial
>>> Net: UEC3Warning: failed to set MAC address
>>>
Hi Mike,
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday, September 23, 2011 11:55:11 Simon Glass wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > On Saturday, September 17, 2011 12:48:45 Simon Glass wrote:
>> >> Since the sandbox architecture doesn't do re
Hi Mike,
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday, September 25, 2011 16:18:32 Simon Glass wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> > Simon Glass wrote:
>> >> > do_reset() is not supposed to return
>> >>
>> >> I have adjusted the function meani
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> Acked-by: Mike Frysinger
> -mike
>
Thanks - quick question: I want to move this from RFC to normal patch
in the next version - should I start at version 3 or version 1 for the
header?
Regards,
Simon
_
Hi Albert,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> This adds to the basic clock functionality already available. The concept
> of a peripheral ID is introduced, and all peripheral clock access is done
> using this ID.
>
> Functions are provided to start, query and adjust peripheral
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Sunday, September 25, 2011 16:18:32 Simon Glass wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> > Simon Glass wrote:
>>> >> > do_reset() is not sup
Hi Wolfgang,
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Simon Glass,
>
> In message <1316799532-20761-1-git-send-email-...@chromium.org> you wrote:
>> The printf family of functions in U-Boot cannot deal with a situation where
>> the caller provides a buffer which turns out to b
On Monday, September 26, 2011 06:10:37 PM Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday, September 26, 2011 05:03:46 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Monday, September 26, 2011 09:25:36 AM Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > > Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > > The assigned variable can be removed because the pointers are
> > > >
Fix the following gcc4.6 problems:
cmd_date.c: In function ‘do_date’:
cmd_date.c:50:6: warning: variable ‘old_bus’ set but not used
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
asix.c: In function ‘asix_init’:
asix.c:317:6: warning: variable ‘rx_ctl’ set but not used
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
usb.c: In function
On Monday, September 26, 2011 01:30:41 PM Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Marek Vasut,
>
> In message <201109261132.43616.marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote:
> > > Would it be better to change the __arch_putb macro into an extern
> > > inline function instead which would catch these and future cases?
>
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Friday, September 23, 2011 11:55:11 Simon Glass wrote:
>>> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> > On Saturday, September 17, 2011 12:48:45 Simon Gl
Hi Albert,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Le 25/09/2011 16:50, Simon Glass a écrit :
>
>>> Basically, printf family functions which do not have the 'n' are *know*
>>> by
>>> all -- experienced enough :) -- programmers to be *unsafe* (but to
>>> require
>>>
I found my problem.
My board, though based on walnut board, does not have real time clock.
So, I have to disable RTC support in u-boot. However, as soon as I
comment out
#define CONFIG_RTC_DS174x1/* use DS1743 RTC in Walnut*/
in walnut.h, line 68, I get build error.
[root@new-li
Dear Dat Tran,
In message
you wrote:
>
> Also running the latest X-Loader 1.50 and U-Boot 2011.09-rc1, it takes about
> 2 seconds from power on to starting the Linux Kernel. My Kernel takes 1
> second to load and my file system takes another 1.5 seconds for a total of
> 4.5 seconds from power on
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <201109261209.46800.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> > ...here you change a compile time error check into a runtim error.
>
> no, it'll still be a build time error as IH_ARCH_DEFAULT will be undefined
>
> it just might not be as clean an error ... gcc will compla
Dear Marek Vasut,
In message <201109261931.24045.marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> > i think gcc-3.x has been broken for a while but no one has noticed
>
> I guess we should go the kernel way -- make it 4.2 and be done with it.
You are off by one major version. The kernel README says:
Hi Marek,
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> cmd_mem.c: In function ‘do_mem_loop’:
> cmd_mem.c:474:25: warning: variable ‘junk’ set but not used
> [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>
> The assigned variable can be removed because the pointers are volatile so
> accesses to their addre
Sorry to keep relying to my self.
It seems that the tool that generates u-boot.lds does not like // in the
header file and putting it in the u-boot.lds file.
I started using /* */ instead and it compiles OK now.
Thanks.
Brian
On 9/26/2011 10:54 AM, Brian S. Park wrote:
I found my problem.
Hi Mike,
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday, September 23, 2011 12:01:46 Simon Glass wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > On Saturday, September 17, 2011 12:48:57 Simon Glass wrote:
>> >> There are a few variables set but not used -
Dear Kim Phillips,
In message <20110926112756.bb93d41b.kim.phill...@freescale.com> you wrote:
>
> > Instead of extending buffer sizes just to be able to enter some
> > incomrephensible long variable setting you should try and figure
>
> this variable (which I have been comprehending for years
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <201109260048.41976.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> i would expect "reset" in the sandbox to "exit(1)". how else would you exit ?
"reset" should then use "exit(EXIT_SUCCESS)" as thisis a normal
termination of the program, not an error condition.
Best regards,
On Monday, September 26, 2011 13:58:59 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > ...here you change a compile time error check into a runtim error.
> >
> > no, it'll still be a build time error as IH_ARCH_DEFAULT will be
> > undefined
> >
> > it just might not be as clean an error ... gc
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> cmd_nvedit.c: In function ‘do_env_edit’:
> cmd_nvedit.c:463:6: warning: variable ‘len’ set but not used
> [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
I need this also!
Acked-by: Simon Glass
> ---
> common/cmd_nvedit.c |
On Monday, September 26, 2011 14:12:21 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i would expect "reset" in the sandbox to "exit(1)". how else would you
> > exit ?
>
> "reset" should then use "exit(EXIT_SUCCESS)" as thisis a normal
> termination of the program, not an error condition.
sure
Hi Mike,
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday, September 23, 2011 12:00:15 Simon Glass wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > On Saturday, September 17, 2011 12:48:56 Simon Glass wrote:
>> >> +#define CONFIG_DRAM_SIZE (128 << 20)
>>
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <201109191036.38248.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> > Please update doc/feature-removal-schedule.txt as well.
>
> i didnt have a schedule in mind ... just start scaring people :)
>
> any target you have in mind ?
Next release? Second next release?
Best regards
On Monday, September 26, 2011 08:05:43 PM Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > cmd_mem.c: In function ‘do_mem_loop’:
> > cmd_mem.c:474:25: warning: variable ‘junk’ set but not used
> > [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> >
> > The assigned variable
HI Wolfgang,
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Simon Glass,
>
> In message
> you
> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, indeed. Could we go as far as removing CONFIG_SYS_PBSIZE, and
>> just use a standard value?
>
> If you can find one that fits for all boards? Keep in mind that
> pri
Hi Merek,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Monday, September 26, 2011 08:05:43 PM Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Marek,
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> > cmd_mem.c: In function ‘do_mem_loop’:
>> > cmd_mem.c:474:25: warning: variable ‘junk’ set but
On Monday, September 26, 2011 08:03:45 PM Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Marek Vasut,
>
> In message <201109261931.24045.marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote:
> > > i think gcc-3.x has been broken for a while but no one has noticed
> >
> > I guess we should go the kernel way -- make it 4.2 and be done w
Dear Marek Vasut,
In message <201109261937.01263.marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> > What exactly are the advantages, and what the disadvantages?
> >
> > code size / memory footprint?
>
> I assume converting those to inline function will yield no memory usage
> growth
> at all.
Please don
On Monday, September 26, 2011 08:29:22 PM Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Merek,
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Monday, September 26, 2011 08:05:43 PM Simon Glass wrote:
> >> Hi Marek,
> >>
> >> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> > cmd_mem.c: In fu
On 09/24/2011 07:37 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Friday, September 23, 2011 07:35:15 PM Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 09/22/2011 03:51 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On Thursday, September 22, 2011 09:41:21 AM Stefano Babic wrote:
On 09/21/2011 10:16 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Stefano & Marek,
>
On Monday, September 26, 2011 08:33:58 PM Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Marek Vasut,
>
> In message <201109261937.01263.marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote:
> > > What exactly are the advantages, and what the disadvantages?
> > >
> > > code size / memory footprint?
> >
> > I assume converting those t
Dear Simon Glass,
In message
you wrote:
>
> For sprintf() I agree - this is well understood and people are aware
> of it. For printf() I am not so sure.
We are a resource limited boot loader. We got for a small footprint,
and accept some resulting restrictions, if they are not really severe.
Dear "Brian S. Park",
In message <4e80bc71.4000...@corelis.com> you wrote:
>
> I found my problem.
>
> My board, though based on walnut board, does not have real time clock.
> So, I have to disable RTC support in u-boot. However, as soon as I
> comment out
>
> #define CONFIG_RTC_DS174x1
Dear "Brian S. Park",
In message <4e80bf3d.8050...@corelis.com> you wrote:
>
> It seems that the tool that generates u-boot.lds does not like // in the
> header file and putting it in the u-boot.lds file.
The "tool that generates u-boot.lds" is the standard C preprocessor.
Best regards,
Wolfga
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <201109261415.14398.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> > Should it not be trivial to add a
> >
> > #ifndef IH_ARCH_DEFAULT
> > # error Unknown CPU type: IH_ARCH_DEFAULT not set
> > #endif
> >
> > or similar to include/image.h ?
>
> it'd certainly be ea
Dear Simon Glass,
In message
you wrote:
>
> > If you can find one that fits for all boards? =A0Keep in mind that
> > printf() gets used before relocation, when available stack space may
> > be _very_ limited.
>
> Yes that is a problem. Perhaps we could changes things so that this
> CONFIG real
The size of uboot binary grows by a few bytes, but the gain (better type
checking) is worth it.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
Cc: Wolfgang Denk
Cc: Nick Thompson
Cc: Simon Glass
---
arch/arm/include/asm/io.h | 34 --
1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletion
On Monday, September 26, 2011 08:33:56 PM Scott Wood wrote:
> On 09/24/2011 07:37 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Friday, September 23, 2011 07:35:15 PM Scott Wood wrote:
> >> On 09/22/2011 03:51 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, September 22, 2011 09:41:21 AM Stefano Babic wrote:
> On 0
Dear Marek Vasut,
In message <201109262029.24934.marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> Anyway, is there still anyone using 3.x ? If there isn't any such users, we
> should simply discard it, add gcc version check and set the lower bound to
> some
> not-too-buggy version of gcc4.
To be honest:
Hi Marek,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Monday, September 26, 2011 08:29:22 PM Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Merek,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> > On Monday, September 26, 2011 08:05:43 PM Simon Glass wrote:
>> >> Hi Marek,
>> >>
>> >> On S
Hi Wolfgang,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Simon Glass,
>
> In message
> you
> wrote:
>>
>> > If you can find one that fits for all boards? =A0Keep in mind that
>> > printf() gets used before relocation, when available stack space may
>> > be _very_ limited.
>>
Thank you for the information. I'm just re-learning my way around
u-boot. I appreciate your comments and pointers. Last time I used
u-boot, it did not use the current method for configuration and I was
able to us // to comment stuff out in the configuration header file.
Thank you and you guys
Hi Anton,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Anton Staaf wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Sunday, September 25, 2011 16:18:32 Simon Glass wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Wolf
Hi Marek,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Monday, September 26, 2011 09:01:16 PM Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Marek,
>>
>>
>> The assignment to i I was referring to is here:
>>
>> if (length == 1) {
>> if (size == 4) {
>> longp = (ui
On Monday, September 26, 2011 09:01:16 PM Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Monday, September 26, 2011 08:29:22 PM Simon Glass wrote:
> >> Hi Merek,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Marek Vasut
wrote:
> >> > On Monday, Sep
Hi Anton,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Anton Staaf wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Friday, September 23, 2011 11:55:11 Simon Glass wrote:
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Mike
Hello Wolfgang,
On 23.09.2011 09:06, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Andy Fleming,
>
> In
> message
> you wrote:
>>
>> Shoot, I just saw this patch in my tree. It's incorrect.
>
> Argh...
>
>> The lines weren't redundant. The logic is (and probably should be
>> better commented):
>>
>> Find the int
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Anton,
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Anton Staaf wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday, September 23, 2011 11:55:1
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
