On 29/07/2012 03:33, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Otavio Salvador,
>
Hi Marek, Otavio,
>> As the register accessing mode is the same for all i.MXS SoCs we ought
>> to use 'mxs' prefix intead of 'mx28'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
>> ---
>> arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/clock.c |
Dear Stefano Babic,
[...]
> >
> > Given that the PSU regs for example have completely different register
> > map and bit maps in the registers itself, I'd be careful with the
> > renaming.
>
> Personally I prefer that the function names are the same and the
> implementation itself of the functio
Dear Avner Flesch,
In message
<4a6f885e2bde12468ec281ba9f1cb58f0906a...@dbxprd0610mb359.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
you wrote:
>
> Thank you very much.
> Unfortunately , the only register file I have is for mpc8xx, I'll appreciate
> it very much
> if you will also attach the reg8313e.def you ha
On 28/07/2012 23:43, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> The information now is gathered from HW_DIGCTL_CHIPID register and
> includes the chip modem and revision on the output.
>
> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
> ---
Applied to u-boot-imx, next branch, thanks.
Best regards,
Stefano Babic
--
==
Hi Linus,
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:35:05 +0200, Linus Walleij
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Linus Walleij
> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Linus Walleij
> > wrote:
> >
> >> The configuration that is common for all Integrator boards may
> >> just as well be stored in a
Hi Linus,
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 11:14:34 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:35:05 +0200, Linus Walleij
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Linus Walleij
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Linus Walleij
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> The c
Hi Tomas,
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 17:46:41 +0200, Tomas Hlavacek wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am working on early_malloc() for U-Boot Driver Model (this malloc is
> going to serve for internal DM structures during early init and it has it's
> minimalistic heap in global data).
>
> My question is how to co
Hi Zhong,
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 17:35:42 +0800, Zhong Hongbo wrote:
> From: Zhong Hongbo
>
> When It do not need to relocat for u-boot,
> the offset(r9) of relocation should be set zero.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhong Hongbo
> ---
> Change for V3:
> - Replace mov with moveq.
> Change for V2:
>
On 27/07/2012 10:53, Stathis Voukelatos wrote:
> Fixed some typos in the i.MX28 PMU code that sets up the VDDD and VDDIO power
> rails. In addition the VDDD and VDDIO brownout offset values should be
> divided by a step size before being programmed to the corresponding registers.
>
> Signed-off-
On 28/07/2012 23:43, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> The information now is gathered from HW_DIGCTL_CHIPID register and
> includes the chip modem and revision on the output.
>
> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - use ?? for unidentified revision and cpu type
> - use numeric revisi
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
> Hi Tomas,
>
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 17:46:41 +0200, Tomas Hlavacek wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I am working on early_malloc() for U-Boot Driver Model (this malloc is
> > going to serve for internal DM structures during early init and it has
> > it's minimalistic heap in globa
On 07/29/2012 06:12 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Zhong,
>
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 17:35:42 +0800, Zhong Hongbo wrote:
>> From: Zhong Hongbo
>>
>> When It do not need to relocat for u-boot,
>> the offset(r9) of relocation should be set zero.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhong Hongbo
>> ---
>> Change for
Hi Thomas,
P.S. I dropped the DM list...
It took a couple of other emails to get what is going on here...
On 07/29/2012 01:46 AM, Tomas Hlavacek wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am working on early_malloc() for U-Boot Driver Model (this malloc is
> going to serve for internal DM structures during early in
Hi Albert,
On 07/29/2012 06:50 PM, Zhong Hongbo wrote:
> On 07/29/2012 06:12 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>> Hi Zhong,
>>
>> On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 17:35:42 +0800, Zhong Hongbo wrote:
>>> From: Zhong Hongbo
>>>
>>> When It do not need to relocat for u-boot,
>>> the offset(r9) of relocation should be se
Dear Graeme Russ,
> Hi Thomas,
>
> P.S. I dropped the DM list...
>
> It took a couple of other emails to get what is going on here...
>
> On 07/29/2012 01:46 AM, Tomas Hlavacek wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I am working on early_malloc() for U-Boot Driver Model (this malloc is
> > going to serve f
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> On 28/07/2012 23:43, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> The information now is gathered from HW_DIGCTL_CHIPID register and
>> includes the chip modem and revision on the output.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
> I was convinced I had already app
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Personally I prefer that the function names are the same and the
> implementation itself of the function hides the SOC details. In this
> way, we provide the same interface API to the user (=the board
> maintainer) and to the drivers that are
Dear Otavio Salvador,
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> > Personally I prefer that the function names are the same and the
> > implementation itself of the function hides the SOC details. In this
> > way, we provide the same interface API to the user (=the board
> > mainta
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Otavio Salvador,
>
>> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> > Personally I prefer that the function names are the same and the
>> > implementation itself of the function hides the SOC details. In this
>> > way, we provi
Dear Otavio Salvador,
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Otavio Salvador,
> >
> >> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> >> > Personally I prefer that the function names are the same and the
> >> > implementation itself of the function hides the SOC
I installed buildroot as my embedded linux environment. For first time I can
build u-boot. But if i change a c-file and try to recompile u-boot. It
doesn,t work. Buildroot doesn,t notice this changing and does nothing.
Can anybody give me any hints please
Hi Graeme,
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Graeme Russ wrote:
> Not exactly on-topic, but I really hope that everything is wrapped so a
> simple call to malloc() will work pre-relocation. Of course, everything you
> malloc pre-relocation will have to be re-malloc'd and relocated after
> reloca
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
In message <1335779859-14010-1-git-send-email...@denx.de> you wrote:
> Also drop a few files referring to no longer / not yet supported
> boards.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk
> Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar
> Cc: Stefan Roese
> Cc: Kim Phillips
> Cc: Andy Fleming
> Cc: Jason
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
In message <1343371961-1253-1-git-send-email...@denx.de> you wrote:
> make would spit out a message like
>
> Generating /tmp/build/include/generated/asm-offsets.h
>
> even when running with option "-s". Fix this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk
> ---
> Makefile |
Dear Marek Vasut,
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 03:40:32 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 04:13:45 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 04:01:11 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > > > > + token = (toggle << 31) |
> > > > > > > +
Current writes on nor flash uses normal flash write calls
due to this writing to NOR is very slow,
so I was enabled buffered writes and tested on QEMU.
Regards,
Jagan.
Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki (2):
image/FIT: Add ramdisk load, entry address and OS tag inclusion
versatile: board configs:
This patch provides a support to use buffered writes on flash
for versatile and vexpress boards.
This will certainly increase the flash writes.
Signed-off-by: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki <402ja...@gmail.com>
---
include/configs/ca9x4_ct_vxp.h |2 ++
include/configs/versatile.h|1 +
Dear Benoît Thébaudeau,
> Dear Marek Vasut,
>
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 03:40:32 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 04:13:45 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 04:01:11 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > > [...]
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > +
Hi Thomas,
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Tomas Hlavacek wrote:
> Hi Graeme,
>
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Graeme Russ wrote:
>
>> Not exactly on-topic, but I really hope that everything is wrapped so a
>> simple call to malloc() will work pre-relocation. Of course, everything you
>>
On 07/29/2012 07:43:00 AM, Sabri Altunbas wrote:
> I installed buildroot as my embedded linux environment. For first
> time
> I can
> build u-boot. But if i change a c-file and try to recompile u-boot.
> It
> doesn,t work. Buildroot doesn,t notice this changing and does
> nothing.
>
> Can anybo
> -Original Message-
> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-
> boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Karl O. Pinc
> Sent: 30 July 2012 08:00
> To: Sabri Altunbas
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] building u-boot inside buildroot
>
> On 07/29/2012 07:43:00 AM,
> -Original Message-
> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-
> boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Marek Vasut
> Sent: 28 July 2012 01:20
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: Marek Vasut; Joe Hershberger; u-boot...@lists.denx.de
> Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] dm: net: Fixup the arma
> -Original Message-
> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-
> boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Gerlando Falauto
> Sent: 27 July 2012 20:28
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: Holger Brunck
> Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] km/common: remove printfs for i2c deblocking
> code
>
> F
Dear Prafulla Wadaskar,
> > -Original Message-
> > From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-
> > boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Marek Vasut
> > Sent: 28 July 2012 01:20
> > To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> > Cc: Marek Vasut; Joe Hershberger; u-boot...@lists.denx.de
> > Subject: [U-
Dear Marek Vasut,
> Write the TSCR register via 32bit write instead of 16bit one.
> The register is 32bit wide and bit 16 is being set, triggering
> gcc overflow error and making the code broken.
[...]
Dan, can you please pick these (I didn't CC you ... sigh :/ ) ?
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
_
> -Original Message-
> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-
> boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Karl O. Pinc
> Sent: 27 July 2012 20:23
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Cosmetic doc typo fixes to the kwbimage feature
> docs
>
> On 07/26/2012 11:15:32 PM,
This series adds NAND flash support to Tegra and enables it on Seaboard.
Included here is a proposed device tree binding with most of the properties
private to "nvidia,". The binding includes information about the NAND
controller as well as the connected NAND device. The Seaboard has a
Hynix HY27U
37 matches
Mail list logo
