Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/9] sunxi: initial upstreamining effort

2014-03-22 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Ian Campbell, In message 1395438845.2234.95.ca...@hastur.hellion.org.uk you wrote: This is my second cut at an upstreamable series based upon the https://github.com/linux-sunxi/u-boot-sunxi.git#sunxi tree. The intention is to present a minimal starting point for upstreaming to which

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/9] sunxi: initial generic sun7i cpu, board and start of day support

2014-03-22 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Ian Campbell, In message 1395438866-1193-4-git-send-email-...@hellion.org.uk you wrote: This has been stripped back for mainlining and supports only sun7i. These changes are not useful by themselves but are split out to make the patch sizes more manageable. As well as the following

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/9] sunxi: generic sun7i build infrastructure.

2014-03-22 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Ian Campbell, In message 1395438866-1193-5-git-send-email-...@hellion.org.uk you wrote: This has been stripped back for mainlining and supports only sun7i booting via FEL mode. These changes are not useful by themselves but are split out to make the patch sizes more manageable. As well

[U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/t4240: updated RCW and PBI for rev2.0

2014-03-22 Thread shh.xie
From: Shaohui Xie shaohui@freescale.com Also, remove workaround of rev1.0. Signed-off-by: Shaohui Xie shaohui@freescale.com --- board/freescale/t4qds/t4_pbi.cfg | 17 +++-- board/freescale/t4qds/t4_rcw.cfg | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH/RFC] Reintegration of ns9750

2014-03-22 Thread Rikard Söderström
Hi Marex, Are you referring to the code or the linkage issue as nasty? 2014-03-21 19:28 GMT+01:00 Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de: +CC Albert , this one is quite nasty. [...] Best regards, Marek Vasut Yours Sincerely, Rikard Söderström ___ U-Boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/9] sunxi: initial generic sun7i cpu, board and start of day support

2014-03-22 Thread mrnuke
On Saturday, March 22, 2014 07:52:54 AM Wolfgang Denk wrote: And we implement the same Developer's Certificate of Origin as used in Linux, so we need real names and working e-mail addresses in the Signed-off-by lines - a cursory mentioning that some mysterious j or some hehopmajieh authored

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/9] sunxi: initial generic sun7i cpu, board and start of day support

2014-03-22 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Hans de Goede, In message 532d5238.6080...@redhat.com you wrote: These changes are not useful by themselves but are split out to make the patch sizes more manageable. This is not how we work. Patches have to implement specific features, or fix specific bugs. And they have to

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/9] sunxi: generic sun7i build infrastructure.

2014-03-22 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 07:46 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Ian Campbell, In message 1395438866-1193-5-git-send-email-...@hellion.org.uk you wrote: This has been stripped back for mainlining and supports only sun7i booting via FEL mode. These changes are not useful by themselves but

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/9] sunxi: initial generic sun7i cpu, board and start of day support

2014-03-22 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 10:04 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: Sorry, this is a NAK for these patches. These changes are not useful by themselves but are split out to make the patch sizes more manageable. This is not how we work. Patches have to implement specific features, or fix specific

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/9] sunxi: initial generic sun7i cpu, board and start of day support

2014-03-22 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 03/22/2014 07:52 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Ian Campbell, In message 1395438866-1193-4-git-send-email-...@hellion.org.uk you wrote: This has been stripped back for mainlining and supports only sun7i. These changes are not useful by themselves but are split out to make the patch

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/9] sunxi: generic sun7i build infrastructure.

2014-03-22 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Ian, In message 1395482650.2234.104.ca...@hastur.hellion.org.uk you wrote: What does that mean? I cannot find these names in the SoB lines? I explained the process by which I arrived at these lists in 0/9. It means that they appear as an author for a commit in the history in the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/9] fdt: call ft_board_setup_ex() at the end of image_setup_libfdt()

2014-03-22 Thread Simon Glass
Hi, On 21 March 2014 13:51, Murali Karicheri m-kariche...@ti.com wrote: From: Vitaly Andrianov vita...@ti.com The keystone2 SOC requires to fix all 32 bit aliased addresses to their 36 physical format. This has to happen after all fdt nodes are added or modified. Signed-off-by: Vitaly

Re: [U-Boot] Running mx6qsabrelite at 1Gz with Freescale kernel rel_imx_3.0.35_4.1.0

2014-03-22 Thread Eric Nelson
Thanks Marek, On 03/21/2014 06:33 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: On Friday, March 21, 2014 at 11:50:18 PM, Eric Nelson wrote: [...] 1) The kernel (old, I know) I am using does not like that PCIe to have been formerly probed by u-boot. It hangs at probing if so. We haven't had any trouble with our

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: mx6: Disable PCIe on SABRE Lite/Nitrogen6x

2014-03-22 Thread Eric Nelson
Use of PCIe on SABRE Lite and Nitrogen6x boards is atypical and requires the use of custom daughter boards. Use in U-Boot is even rarer, so this patch removes it from the standard configuration. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson eric.nel...@boundarydevices.com --- include/configs/nitrogen6x.h | 1 - 1

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/4] cpu: exynos4: add ace sha base address

2014-03-22 Thread Minkyu Kang
Dear Przemyslaw Marczak, On 21 March 2014 17:56, Przemyslaw Marczak p.marc...@samsung.com wrote: Signed-off-by: Przemyslaw Marczak p.marc...@samsung.com Cc: Minkyu Kang mk7.k...@samsung.com --- Changes v3: - new commit - after separate changes from next commit Changes v4: - none ---

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH u-boot sunxi 01/12] sunxi: Implement reset_cpu

2014-03-22 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 03/18/2014 11:25 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 00:00 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: There is no way to reset the cpu, so use the watchdog for this. Did you see https://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg134259.html ? Ah no, but I've read it now. I think it

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 04/17] kconfig: add defconfig files for all boards

2014-03-22 Thread Daniel Schwierzeck
2014-03-21 19:05 GMT+01:00 Tom Rini tr...@ti.com: On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 02:17:07PM +0100, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote: 2014-03-20 1:11 GMT+01:00 Masahiro Yamada yamad...@jp.panasonic.com: [3] How to select board directoy by using boolean macros. If we try to emulate arch/arm/Makefile of

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH u-boot sunxi 01/12] sunxi: Implement reset_cpu

2014-03-22 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 17:16 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 03/18/2014 11:25 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 00:00 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: There is no way to reset the cpu, so use the watchdog for this. Did you see

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/9] sunxi: generic sun7i build infrastructure.

2014-03-22 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 03/22/2014 01:33 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Ian, In message 1395482650.2234.104.ca...@hastur.hellion.org.uk you wrote: What does that mean? I cannot find these names in the SoB lines? I explained the process by which I arrived at these lists in 0/9. It means that they appear

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/9] sunxi: generic sun7i build infrastructure.

2014-03-22 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 16:12 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 03/22/2014 01:33 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Ian, In message 1395482650.2234.104.ca...@hastur.hellion.org.uk you wrote: What does that mean? I cannot find these names in the SoB lines? I explained the process by

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/9] sunxi: initial generic sun7i cpu, board and start of day support

2014-03-22 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 13:27 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Hans de Goede, In message 532d5238.6080...@redhat.com you wrote: These changes are not useful by themselves but are split out to make the patch sizes more manageable. This is not how we work. Patches have to implement

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: mx6: Disable PCIe on SABRE Lite/Nitrogen6x

2014-03-22 Thread Marek Vasut
On Saturday, March 22, 2014 at 04:17:09 PM, Eric Nelson wrote: Use of PCIe on SABRE Lite and Nitrogen6x boards is atypical and requires the use of custom daughter boards. Use in U-Boot is even rarer, so this patch removes it from the standard configuration. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH/RFC] Reintegration of ns9750

2014-03-22 Thread Marek Vasut
On Saturday, March 22, 2014 at 11:18:05 AM, Rikard Söderström wrote: Hi Marex, Are you referring to the code or the linkage issue as nasty? Actually, both. But more the linker issue this time ;-) Best regards, Marek Vasut ___ U-Boot mailing list

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/9] sunxi: generic sun7i build infrastructure.

2014-03-22 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Hans de Goede, In message 532da872.5000...@redhat.com you wrote: No as said before the parts for which we don't have a Signed-off-by for falls under b), since we took it from existing code which has clear GPLv2+ license headers on each and every file. Can the code be properly

[U-Boot] [PATCH] we don't went version control for .cmd files

2014-03-22 Thread Pavel Machek
commit 5acba11ad70ba7eeb8cc82e7dd77871f022964dd Author: Pavel Machek pa...@denx.de Date: Sat Mar 22 20:09:49 2014 +0100 .cmd files should not be version-controlled. Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek pa...@denx.de diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index a163728..77fb2c8 100644 ---

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: mx6: Disable PCIe on SABRE Lite/Nitrogen6x

2014-03-22 Thread Thierry Bultel
When I communicated about the bug I had, and said that my temporary workaround was to disable the PCIe, my intention was not to make the suppression become a standard, and I believe it is a little bit frustrating for Marek. The AMOS820, based on the sabrelite/nitrogen has a PCIe slot on the main

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: mx6: Disable PCIe on SABRE Lite/Nitrogen6x

2014-03-22 Thread Eric Nelson
Hi Thierry, On 03/22/2014 01:50 PM, Thierry Bultel wrote: When I communicated about the bug I had, and said that my temporary workaround was to disable the PCIe, my intention was not to make the suppression become a standard, and I believe it is a little bit frustrating for Marek. I'm not

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] sandbox: Update and expand the README

2014-03-22 Thread Simon Glass
Now that sandbox has a good base of features, the README is quite out of date. Update it, and document the new features. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org --- README | 11 ++ board/sandbox/sandbox/README.sandbox | 222 +--

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] sandbox: Provide a build option to avoid using SDL

2014-03-22 Thread Simon Glass
Some machines do not have SDL libraries installed, and it is still useful to build sandbox without LCD/keyboard support. Add an option for this, used as follows: make sandbox_config all NO_SDL=1 Signed-off-by: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org --- arch/sandbox/config.mk| 6 ++

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] patman: Deal with 'git apply' failures correctly

2014-03-22 Thread Simon Glass
This sort of failure is rare, but the code to deal with it is wrong. Fix it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org --- tools/patman/gitutil.py | 6 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/patman/gitutil.py b/tools/patman/gitutil.py index

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] patman: Avoid duplicate sign-offs

2014-03-22 Thread Simon Glass
Collect all Signed-off-by tags in a commit and make sure that there are no duplicates. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org --- tools/patman/README | 1 + tools/patman/commit.py | 13 + tools/patman/patchstream.py | 10 -- 3 files changed, 22

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Start the deprecation process for generic board

2014-03-22 Thread Simon Glass
We should move forward to remove the old board init code. Add a prominent message to encourage maintainers to get started on this work. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org --- common/main.c| 6 ++ doc/README.generic-board | 189

[U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-x86.git misc

2014-03-22 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, Here are a few more things from my patchwork queue. I have tested with buildman. The following changes since commit 2c072c958bb544c72f0e848375803dbd6971f022: sandbox: config: Enable cros_ec emulation and related items (2014-03-17 20:05:50 -0600) are available in the git repository

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/9] sunxi: generic sun7i build infrastructure.

2014-03-22 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 03/22/2014 08:31 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Hans de Goede, In message 532da872.5000...@redhat.com you wrote: No as said before the parts for which we don't have a Signed-off-by for falls under b), since we took it from existing code which has clear GPLv2+ license headers on each

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: mx6: Disable PCIe on SABRE Lite/Nitrogen6x

2014-03-22 Thread Marek Vasut
On Saturday, March 22, 2014 at 09:50:52 PM, Thierry Bultel wrote: When I communicated about the bug I had, and said that my temporary workaround was to disable the PCIe, my intention was not to make the suppression become a standard, and I believe it is a little bit frustrating for Marek.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: mx6: Disable PCIe on SABRE Lite/Nitrogen6x

2014-03-22 Thread Marek Vasut
On Saturday, March 22, 2014 at 10:49:25 PM, Eric Nelson wrote: Hi Thierry, On 03/22/2014 01:50 PM, Thierry Bultel wrote: When I communicated about the bug I had, and said that my temporary workaround was to disable the PCIe, my intention was not to make the suppression become a standard,

[U-Boot] [PULL] u-boot-usb/master

2014-03-22 Thread Marek Vasut
The following changes since commit 2c072c958bb544c72f0e848375803dbd6971f022: