On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 23:46, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 09:28:57AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Sughosh,
> >
> > On Sun, 28 Jul 2024 at 12:07, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 at 18:24, Sughosh Ganu
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 at
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 10:24:49PM +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> Here is a bunch of configuration cleanups for OMAP boards, mostly
> unifying and moving common configuration from board-specific defconfigs
> to Kconfig definitions.
>
> There's also a cleanup of the sniper (LG Optimus Black)
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 01:36:09PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 at 01:33, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 at 15:42, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 09:37:15AM +0100, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > Hi Tom,
> > > >
> >
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 10:19:00AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-dm/-/pipelines/21789
> https://dev.azure.com/simon0972/u-boot/_build/results?buildId=66=results
>
> The following changes since commit
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 09:28:57AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Sughosh,
>
> On Sun, 28 Jul 2024 at 12:07, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 at 18:24, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 at 02:24, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 20:59, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Hi Sughosh,
>
> On Sun, 28 Jul 2024 at 12:07, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 at 18:24, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 at 02:24, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 11:31:48AM +0530,
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 05:03, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Hi Sughosh,
>
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 00:03, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> >
> > Add a couple of helper functions to detect an empty and full alist.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu
> > ---
> > Changes since rfc: None
> >
> > include/alist.h |
Hi Simon,
On 24.07.24 17:08, Simon Glass wrote:
Use the new video function to get the framebuffer base.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
Tested-by: Stefan Bosch
Looks OK, tested on FriendlyElec-Board NanoPC-T2
(s5p4418_nanopi2_defconfig).
Thanks!
board/friendlyarm/nanopi2/board.c |
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 08:54:52AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 08:33, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 08:00:37AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > In various places it is useful to have an array of structures, but allow
> > > it to grow. In some
Hi Chris,
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 10:45, Chris Webb wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> Simon Glass wrote:
>
> > Well, yes, mt7981_pinctrl is wrong since it is not actually binding
> > the GPIO devices until it itself is probed. It should do it when it is
> > bound.
>
> Oh I see! Yes, I can see the
Hi Quentin,
On 2024-07-29 10:48, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> Hi Jonas,
>
> On 7/24/24 9:44 AM, Jonas Karlman wrote:
>> The merged upstream DT node for OTP differs slightly, update node in
>> rk3308-u-boot.dtsi to match Linux kernel v6.11-rc1 in order to reduce
>> possible issue in future when
Hi Simon,
Simon Glass wrote:
Well, yes, mt7981_pinctrl is wrong since it is not actually binding
the GPIO devices until it itself is probed. It should do it when it is
bound.
Oh I see! Yes, I can see the mtk_gpiochip_register(dev) in
mtk_pinctrl_common_probe() exactly as you say.
Add basic support for searching for matching of non-matching values.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
Fixes: https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-dm/-/issues/20
---
Changes in v2:
- Drop debugging
doc/develop/qconfig.rst | 14 ++
tools/qconfig.py| 15 +++
Add a flag to output the found list in a more user-friendly format, with
one board per line. Omit the board count.
This can be useful with grep, for example.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
Changes in v2:
- Add new patch to support a 'list' format
tools/qconfig.py | 14 ++
1 file
There is no particular ordering of the board list at present, since it
is generated by a multi-threaded process. Sort them by name to make it
easier to see if a particular board is present.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
Changes in v2:
- Add a new patch to sort the boards by name when finding
The docs have somehow got out of sync. Regenerate the file to fix the
problem.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
tools/binman/bintools.rst | 61 ---
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
Applied to u-boot-dm, thanks!
Add VPL support in this tool.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
Fixes: f86ca5ad8f7 ("Introduce Verifying Program Loader (VPL)")
---
scripts/basic/fixdep.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Applied to u-boot-dm, thanks!
The example contains references to an non-existent node. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
tools/binman/binman.rst | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Applied to u-boot-dm, thanks!
This function returns a value, so add documentation for it.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
tools/binman/btool/fdt_add_pubkey.py | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
Applied to u-boot-dm, thanks!
This has become quite long, so move it into a separate function.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
tools/binman/control.py | 78 -
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
Applied to u-boot-dm, thanks!
When symbol-writing does not appear to work, it can sometimes be hard to
figure out what is going on. Add some more debugging to help.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
tools/binman/elf.py | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied to u-boot-dm, thanks!
When an entry is compressed, write the compressed contents to a file so
that it is possible to see what was produced. This aids debugging with
new images.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
tools/binman/entry.py | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
Applied to u-boot-dm, thanks!
The filenames are a bit confused. Fix them.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
tools/binman/etype/blob_dtb.py | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied to u-boot-dm, thanks!
Add a comment about this entry type being expanded, to match the comment
for SPL and TPL. Drop an unwanted line in the SPL and TPL docs while
here.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
tools/binman/entries.rst | 11 +--
tools/binman/etype/u_boot_spl_nodtb.py | 2 --
Fix a minor typo in this function.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
tools/binman/ftest.py | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied to u-boot-dm, thanks!
This function has strange indentation. Fix it.
Fixes: 8c1fbd1f607 ("binman: ftest: Add test for u_boot_spl_pubkey_dtb")
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
tools/binman/ftest.py | 39 ++-
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
Applied to u-boot-dm,
Binman needs the ability to run fdtgrep to prepare devicetree subsets
for use by SPL and TPL. Add a new bintool in preparation for this.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
tools/binman/bintools.rst | 8 ++
tools/binman/btool/fdtgrep.py | 137 ++
2 files
Allow the entry-docs command to operate even if pylibfdt is not present
in the systemn.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
tools/binman/image.py | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
Applied to u-boot-dm, thanks!
FIT provides a way to select between different devicetree blobs
depending on the model. This works fine for U-Boot proper and allows SPL
to select the correct blob for the current board at runtime. The boot
sequence (SPL->U-Boot proper) is therefore covered by the existing
feature set.
The first
At present the contents of an FDT (for each phase) are fixed,
determined by the build and provided to Binman as input files.
Provide a means for entry types to provide their own FDT, so that it can
be processed, if needed.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
tools/binman/entry.py | 12
In some cases the list of available FDT files is not available in an
entryarg. Provide an option to point to a directory containing them
instead.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
tools/binman/entries.rst | 7
tools/binman/etype/fit.py | 19 -
Provide these parameters to binman so that it can produce images
targeted at VPL.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
Makefile | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Applied to u-boot-dm, thanks!
When using FIT to load firmware builds for multiple models, the FIT must
include a common binary along with a number of devicetree blobs, one for
each model. This is the same mechanism as is used for loading an OS.
However, SPL builds do not normally use the full devicetree, but instead
a
FIT allows the FDT's root-node compatible string to be placed in a
configuration node to simplify and speed up finding the best match for
booting.
Add a new property to support this.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
tools/binman/entries.rst | 5 ++
tools/binman/etype/fit.py
Pass CONFIG_OF_SPL_REMOVE_PROPS to binman so that it can remove
properties correctly when producing FITs for SPL phases.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
Makefile | 1 +
tools/binman/etype/fit.py | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied to u-boot-dm,
Hi Tom,
https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-dm/-/pipelines/21789
https://dev.azure.com/simon0972/u-boot/_build/results?buildId=66=results
The following changes since commit 9366640449ac3ef702b624e2f6f7604754a9082b:
Merge tag 'dm-pull-26jul24' of
Hi Chris,
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 09:44, Chris Webb wrote:
>
> Simon Glass wrote:
>
> > We cannot probe devices when they are bound since it breaks the
> > ordering of driver model.
> >
> > From your trace it looks like everything is happening after
> > relocation. I can't quite see what is
Simon Glass wrote:
We cannot probe devices when they are bound since it breaks the
ordering of driver model.
From your trace it looks like everything is happening after
relocation. I can't quite see what is actually going wrong. But if you
look at dm_init_and_scan(), it does the probe at the
Hi Sughosh,
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 02:00, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 05:02, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sughosh,
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 00:04, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> > >
> > > Introduce a function lmb_add_memory() to add available memory to the
> > > LMB memory
Hi Sughosh,
On Sun, 28 Jul 2024 at 12:07, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 at 18:24, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 at 02:24, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 11:31:48AM +0530, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Simon Glass
> > > >
> > > >
Hi Patrick,
On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 at 01:20, Patrick Rudolph
wrote:
>
> Based on the existing work done by Simon Glass this series adds
> support for booting aarch64 devices using ACPI only. As target the
> Raspberry Pi4 was used, which is broadly available and allows easy
> testing of the proposed
Hi Patrick,
On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 at 01:20, Patrick Rudolph
wrote:
>
> Allows to build the RPi4 with ACPI enabled.
>
> TEST: - Boots on qemu-system-aarch64 -machine raspi4b
> - Boots on real hardware with arm_64bit=1 in config.txt
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph
> Cc: Simon Glass
> Cc:
On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 at 01:20, Patrick Rudolph
wrote:
>
> On FDT platforms the APs are brought out of reset using the spin-table
> as defined in the DT. On ACPI enabled platforms there's no FDT, thus
> enable the ARMV8_MULTIENTRY to use the ACPI parking protocol instead.
>
> TEST: - Aps enter
Hi Patrick,
On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 at 01:20, Patrick Rudolph
wrote:
>
> When ACPI is enabled over FDT the APs cannot be brought out of reset
> by the OS using the "FDT spin-table" mechanism, as no FDT is provided
> to the OS. The APs must be released out of reset in u-boot and then
> brought up in
Hi Patrick,
On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 at 01:20, Patrick Rudolph
wrote:
>
> On Arm platforms that use ACPI they cannot rely on the "spin-table"
> CPU bringup usually defined in the FDT. Thus implement the
> 'ACPI Multi-processor Startup for ARM Platforms', also referred to as
> 'ACPI parking protocol'.
Hi Patrick,
On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 at 01:20, Patrick Rudolph
wrote:
>
> From: Simon Glass
broken email address
>
> Add the necessary DSDT files copied from tianocore to boot the RPi4.
> In addition generate a board specific SSDT to dynamically enable/disable
> ACPI devices based on FDT. This is
Hi Patrick,
On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 at 01:20, Patrick Rudolph
wrote:
>
> Allocate a 64KiB buffer for ACPI tables and provide SoC specific tables
> for BCM2711:
> - MADT
> - FADT
> - PPTT
> - GTDT
> - SPCR
>
> Board specific tables like DSDT and SSDT are added in a separate patch.
>
> When ACPI is
On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 at 01:20, Patrick Rudolph
wrote:
>
> Return the ACPI table revision in acpi_get_table_revision() for
> PPTT and GTDT. Match both to ACPI 6.2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph
> Cc: Simon Glass
> ---
> include/acpi/acpi_table.h | 2 ++
> lib/acpi/acpi_table.c | 4
On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 at 01:20, Patrick Rudolph
wrote:
>
> The FADT structure found in U-Boot represents FADT revision 6 and the
> GICC and GICD structures defined in U-Boot are based on ACPI revision
> 6.3.
>
> Bump the table revision to fix FWTS failures seen on aarch64.
>
> Signed-off-by:
Hi Patrick,
On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 at 01:20, Patrick Rudolph
wrote:
>
> Add generic ACPI code to generate
> - MADT GICC
> - MADT GICD
>
> as commonly used on arm platforms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph
> Cc: Tom Rini
> Cc: Simon Glass
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/acpi_table.h | 18
On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 at 01:20, Patrick Rudolph
wrote:
>
> Add the interrupt flag used in ACPI GTDT table as define.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph
> Cc: Simon Glass
> ---
> include/acpi/acpi_table.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass
On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 at 01:20, Patrick Rudolph
wrote:
>
> From: Maximilian Brune
>
> When ACPI is enabled on arm it will use the getinfo function to fill
> the SPCR ACPI table.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maximilian Brune
> Cc: Simon Glass
> Cc: Tom Rini
> ---
> boot/bootflow.c | 8
On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 at 01:20, Patrick Rudolph
wrote:
>
> Rename ACPI tables MADR to MADT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph
> Cc: Simon Glass
> ---
> include/acpi/acpi_table.h | 16
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass
Hi Patrick,
On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 at 01:20, Patrick Rudolph
wrote:
>
> Write MADT in common code and let the SoC fill out the body by
> calling acpi_fill_madt() which must be implemented at SoC level.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph
> Cc: Simon Glass
> Cc: Bin Meng
> ---
>
Hi Patrick,
On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 at 01:20, Patrick Rudolph
wrote:
>
> From: Maximilian Brune
>
> Write the FADT in common code since it's used on all architectures.
> Let the cpu code fill out the FADT body by introducing a new weak
> function acpi_fill_fadt().
This should be done using the
On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 at 01:20, Patrick Rudolph
wrote:
>
> From: Maximilian Brune
>
> This moves the SPCR and DBG2 table generation into common code, so that
> they can be used by architectures other than x86.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maximilian Brune
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph
> Cc: Simon Glass
Hi Ilias,
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 04:02, Ilias Apalodimas
wrote:
>
> Hi Simon
>
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 17:54, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ilias,
> >
> > On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 02:31, Ilias Apalodimas
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Simon,
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 02:33, Simon
Hi Sughosh,
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 02:58, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 05:03, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sughosh,
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 00:06, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> > >
> > > All the changes needed for making the LMB memory map persistent and
> > > global have
Hi Sughosh,
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 02:56, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 05:03, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sughosh,
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 00:05, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> > >
> > > Add the LMB unit tests under a separate class of tests. The LMB tests
> > > involve
Hi Sughosh,
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 02:53, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 05:02, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sughosh,
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 00:05, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> > >
> > > Instead of a randomly selected address, use an LMB allocated one for
> > > reading the
Hi Sughosh,
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 02:52, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 05:02, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sughosh,
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 00:05, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> > >
> > > The sandbox iommu driver uses the LMB module to allocate a particular
> > > range of
Hi Sughosh,
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 02:45, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 05:02, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sughosh,
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 00:04, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> > >
> > > The TCG event log buffer is being set at the end of ram memory. This
> > > region of
Hi Sughosh,
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 02:42, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 05:02, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sughosh,
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 00:04, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> > >
> > > Almost all of the current definitions of arch_lmb_reserve() are doing
> > > the same
Hi Sughosh,
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 02:40, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 05:02, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sughosh,
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 00:04, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> > >
> > > Add a flags parameter to the LMB API functions. The parameter can then
> > > be used to
Hi Sughosh,
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 02:36, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 05:02, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sughosh,
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 00:04, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> > >
> > > The memory map maintained by the LMB module is now persistent and
> > > global. This
Hi Sughosh,
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 01:46, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
>
> hi Simon,
>
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 05:02, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sughosh,
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 00:03, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> > >
> > > If the malloc simple functionality is enabled in SPL, it is not
> > >
Hi Sughosh,
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 01:50, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 05:02, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sughosh,
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 00:03, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> > >
> > > The current LMB API's for allocating and reserving memory use a
> > > per-caller based
Hi Chris,
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 at 04:59, Chris Webb wrote:
>
> 48b3ecbe replumbed the gpio-hog probing to use DM_FLAG_PROBE_AFTER_BIND.
>
> Unfortunately gpio_post_bind is called after the non-preloc recursive
> dm_probe_devices completes, so setting this flag does not have the intended
> effect
Hi Ilias,
On 7/29/24 14:29, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> Hi Jerome,
>
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 at 15:59, Jerome Forissier
> wrote:
>>
>> Add support for setting the TFTP block size. The default value (1468)
>> is fine for Ethernet and allows a better throughput than the TFTP
>> default (512), if the
I tried both the gcc-12.2 and the gcc-14.1, and both exhibit the same
problem I am seeing. And I tried it with the M5373EVB which is
included w/ u-boot.
>From the arch/m68k/cpu/mcf530x/start.S:
_vectors:
.long 0x
#if defined(CONFIG_M5307) && \
(CONFIG_TEXT_BASE ==
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 01:36:04PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 at 14:55, Dmitry Rokosov
> wrote:
> >
> > It's really helpful to have the ability to dump BCB block for debugging
> > A/B logic on the board supported this partition schema.
> >
> > Command
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 01:36:06PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 at 14:55, Dmitry Rokosov
> wrote:
> >
> > To align with the official Android BCB (Boot Control Block)
> > specifications, it's important to note that the slot_suffix should start
> > with an
Hello Simon,
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 01:36:05PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 at 14:55, Dmitry Rokosov
> wrote:
> >
> > The ab_dump command allows you to display ABC data directly on the
> > U-Boot console. During an A/B test execution, this test verifies the
>
It's not solved yet. I forgot I had hard coded some items.
I will give the flavors you suggest a try.
I'm trying to add the MCF548x for a legacy board we have. It's near
EOL, but we want to leverage uBoot from some in house work.
Thanks,
Pete
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 2:04 PM Angelo Dureghello
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 01:33:19PM +, Benjamin BARATTE wrote:
> To properly enable code optimization with hash algorithm, all the
> reference of the hash algo should condition to hash enablement.
> It is possible to fine tune the list of hash algorithms based on dTPM
> configuration.
>
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 01:33:18PM +, Benjamin BARATTE wrote:
> The number of PCR banks return by the tpm2_get_pcr_info() is related to
> TPM supported list of hash algorithm that could be greater than thus
> supported by U-Boot. This is not an issue as long as the PCR active bank
> hash an
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 09:20, Ilias Apalodimas
wrote:
> Hi Raymond
>
> >
> > +#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(MBEDTLS_LIB_X509)
> > +/* Backup of part of the parsing context */
>
> I am not sure I understand the comment
>
> We can remove this comment line.
> > +struct x509_cert_mbedtls_ctx {
> > +
Hi Benjamin,
Apologies for the late reply, but I wasn't cc'ed in the series. Did you use
get_maintainer.pl for the recipients?
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 01:33:16PM +, Benjamin BARATTE wrote:
> The hash algorithm structure shall reflect the TCG specification for
> TPM2.0
> With vesion 1.59,
On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 at 21:31, Raymond Mao wrote:
>
> Previous patch has introduced MbedTLS porting layer for public key,
> here to adjust the header and makefiles accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raymond Mao
> ---
> Changes in v2
> - Move the porting layer to MbedTLS dir.
> Changes in v3
> -
Hi Raymond
>
> +#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(MBEDTLS_LIB_X509)
> +/* Backup of part of the parsing context */
I am not sure I understand the comment
> +struct x509_cert_mbedtls_ctx {
> + void*tbs; /* Signed data */
> + void*raw_serial;/* Raw serial
27.07.2024 13:35, E Shattow wrote:
Is this a problem in Linux upstream? or specific to U-Boot, and is it
a regression?
refrerence https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20240504183354.GL2568172@bill-the-cat/
and reference
On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 at 15:59, Jerome Forissier
wrote:
>
> Extract some code from cmd/net.c that will be useful in a subsequent
> commit to implement wget with NET_LWIP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Forissier
> ---
> cmd/Makefile | 5 ++-
> cmd/net-common.c | 109
Hi Jerome,
On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 at 15:59, Jerome Forissier
wrote:
>
> Add support for setting the TFTP block size. The default value (1468)
> is fine for Ethernet and allows a better throughput than the TFTP
> default (512), if the server supports the blksize option of course.
>
> I tested this
пн, 29 лип. 2024 р. о 13:42 Marek Vasut пише:
>
> On 7/29/24 7:38 AM, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> The PMIC is on I2C, DM_PMIC enabled in SPL, both buck4 and buck5
> >> regulators are enabled in SPL, have regulator-always-on and
> >> regulator-boot-on and bootph-pre-ram properties.
>
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 06:58:23AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 15:05-20240725, Dhruva Gole wrote:
> > Use the new boot_firmwares labels that help make documentation more
> > specific as to which firmwares are used in which devices
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dhruva Gole
> > ---
> >
From: Quentin Schulz
RK3399 Puma has support for driving multiple displays at the same time,
the most notable scenario being HDMI+DSI since there exists a devkit
with both DSI display and HDMI output.
While HDMI seems to work fine in U-Boot, as the U-Boot logo is shown
whenever the EFI bootmeth
On 7/29/24 7:38 AM, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
[...]
The PMIC is on I2C, DM_PMIC enabled in SPL, both buck4 and buck5
regulators are enabled in SPL, have regulator-always-on and
regulator-boot-on and bootph-pre-ram properties.
This seems similar enough, right ?
Yes, though SPL must remain as
Hi Simon
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 17:54, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Hi Ilias,
>
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 02:31, Ilias Apalodimas
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 02:33, Simon Glass wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Heinrich,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 at 09:54, Heinrich
The counter value read from TDR register may not be correct.
Read SECCNT and CNTR25M instead to get the correct timestamp.
Signed-off-by: Jim Liu
---
drivers/timer/npcm-timer.c | 83 ++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 05:03, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Hi Sughosh,
>
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 00:06, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> >
> > All the changes needed for making the LMB memory map persistent and
> > global have been made, including making corresponding changes in the
> > test code. Re-enable the
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 05:03, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Hi Sughosh,
>
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 00:05, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> >
> > Add the LMB unit tests under a separate class of tests. The LMB tests
> > involve changing the LMB's memory map. With the memory map now
> > persistent and global,
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 05:02, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Hi Sughosh,
>
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 00:05, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> >
> > Instead of a randomly selected address, use an LMB allocated one for
> > reading the file into memory. With the LMB map now being persistent
> > and global, the address
Add Nuvoton BMC NPCM7xx/NPCM8xx sgpio driver.
BMC can use this driver to increase 64 GPI pins and 64 GPO pins to use.
Signed-off-by: Jim Liu
---
drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 9 ++
drivers/gpio/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/gpio/npcm_sgpio.c | 291 ++
3 files
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 05:02, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Hi Sughosh,
>
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 00:05, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> >
> > The sandbox iommu driver uses the LMB module to allocate a particular
> > range of memory for the device virtual address(DVA). This used to work
> > earlier since the
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 05:02, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Hi Sughosh,
>
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 00:05, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> >
> > Initialise the ram bank information for sandbox in SPL. This is needed
> > for initialising the LMB memory map as part of the platform init.
>
> I don't understand what
Hi Jonas,
On 7/24/24 9:44 AM, Jonas Karlman wrote:
The merged upstream DT node for OTP differs slightly, update node in
rk3308-u-boot.dtsi to match Linux kernel v6.11-rc1 in order to reduce
possible issue in future when devicetree-rebasing v6.11-dts is merged.
Why not simply cherry-picking
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 05:02, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Hi Sughosh,
>
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 00:04, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> >
> > The TCG event log buffer is being set at the end of ram memory. This
> > region of memory is to be reserved as LMB_NOMAP memory in the LMB
> > memory map. The current
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 05:02, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Hi Sughosh,
>
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 00:04, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> >
> > Almost all of the current definitions of arch_lmb_reserve() are doing
> > the same thing. The only exception in a couple of cases is the
> > alignment parameter
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 05:02, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Hi Sughosh,
>
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 00:04, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> >
> > Add a flags parameter to the LMB API functions. The parameter can then
> > be used to pass any other type of reservations or allocations needed
> > by the callers. These
Hi Kever,
On 7/29/24 9:18 AM, Kever Yang wrote:
The name of rk3568 evb in mainline kernel is rk3568-evb1-v10.
Signed-off-by: Kever Yang
Reviewed-by: Quentin Schulz
Thanks!
Quentin
1 - 100 of 509164 matches
Mail list logo
