[U-Boot] [PATCH 01/13] imx: mx6sl: ddr: add IOM_GRP registers

Add IOM_GRP register definitions for i.MX6SL to allow them to be named in DDR configuration (.cfg) files. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6sl-ddr.h | 13 + 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/ar

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 1/8] tools: imximage: add plugin support

Hi Peng, On 10/09/2016 06:48 PM, Eric Nelson wrote: > On 10/09/2016 08:12 AM, Peng Fan wrote: >>> On 10/09/2016 04:20 AM, Peng Fan wrote: >>>> On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 05:26:18PM +0200, Eric Nelson wrote: >>>>> On 10/08/2016 08:58 AM, Peng Fan wrote:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 1/8] tools: imximage: add plugin support

Hi Peng, On 10/09/2016 08:12 AM, Peng Fan wrote: >> On 10/09/2016 04:20 AM, Peng Fan wrote: >>> On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 05:26:18PM +0200, Eric Nelson wrote: >>>> On 10/08/2016 08:58 AM, Peng Fan wrote: >>>> >>>> I also don't understand why

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 4/8] imx-common: inctroude USE_IMXIMG_PLUGIN Kconfig

Hi Peng, Note the typo in the subject header. On 10/08/2016 08:58 AM, Peng Fan wrote: > Introduce USE_IMXIMG_PLUGIN Kconfig > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan > Cc: Stefano Babic > Reviewed-by: Tom Rini > --- > > V3: > None > > V2: > New >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 1/8] tools: imximage: add plugin support

Hi Peng, On 10/09/2016 04:20 AM, Peng Fan wrote: > On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 05:26:18PM +0200, Eric Nelson wrote: >> On 10/08/2016 08:58 AM, Peng Fan wrote: >> >>From what I can tell, there's no reason that you can't have multiple >> plugins, and the use of these va

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 1/8] tools: imximage: add plugin support

> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng@nxp.com> > Cc: Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de> > Cc: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> > Cc: Ye Li <ye...@nxp.com> > Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> > --- > > V3: > Fix compile error. > > V2: > D

Re: [U-Boot] Building u-boot.imx and SPL simultaneously

Hi Tom, On 09/06/2016 07:15 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 07:00:56AM -0700, Eric Nelson wrote: >> On 09/06/2016 06:40 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:53:58PM +0200, Petr Kulhavy wrote: >>> >>> Would it be possible to

Re: [U-Boot] Building u-boot.imx and SPL simultaneously

t;>> CONFIG_SPL_YMODEM_SUPPORT is set. >>> >>> This allows to load again a SPL based board >>> with imx_usb_loader together with a tool >>> such as kermit. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de> >>> CC: T

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/4] mx6ul_14x14_evk: Pass refsel and refr fields to avoid hang

F_SEL = 0 --> Periodic refresh cycle: 64kHz > REFR = 1 ---> Refresh Rate - 2 refreshes > > So adjust the MDREF initialization for mx6ul_evk accordingly > to fix the kernel hang issue at low bus frequency. > > Reported-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> > Signed-off

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/4] mx6: ddr: Allow changing REFSEL and REFR fields

> .rst_to_cke = 0x23, > .sde_to_rst = 0x10, > + .refsel = 1,/* Refresh cycles at 32KHz */ > + .refr = 7, /* 8 refresh commands per refresh cycle */ > }; > > static void ccgr_init(void) > diff --git a/board/wandboard/spl.c b/board/wandboard/spl.c &g

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 3/4] mx6ul_14x14_evk: Adjust SPL DDR3 settings

cy */ > + .walat = 0, /* Write additional latency */ > .ralat = 5, /* Read additional latency */ > .mif3_mode = 3, /* Command prediction working mode */ > .bi_on = 1, /* Bank interleaving enabled */ > Reviewed-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/4] mx6: ddr: Allow changing REFSEL and REFR fields

On 08/29/2016 01:59 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Eric, > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> wrote: > >>> /* Step 12: Configure and activate periodic refresh */ >>> - mmdc0->mdref = (1 << 14

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/4] mx6: ddr: Allow changing REFSEL and REFR fields

Hi Fabio, On 08/29/2016 01:35 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > From: Fabio Estevam > > Currently MX6 SPL DDR initialization hardcodes the REF_SEL and > REFR fields of the MDREF register as 1 and 7, respectively. > > Looking at the MDREF initialization done via DCD we see that

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] mx6: ddr: Adjust MDREF register settings for MX6UL

Hi Fabio, On 08/29/2016 12:53 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Eric, > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> wrote: > >> I think this commit message needs work. >> >> "we have" seems to mean that the NXP U-Boot fork has

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] mx6: ddr: Adjust MDREF register settings for MX6UL

Hi Fabio, On 08/29/2016 11:48 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: > Hi Fabio, > > On 08/29/2016 10:56 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote: >> From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.este...@nxp.com> >> >> When running a NXP 4.1 kernel with U-Boot mainline we observe a >> hang when going into

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx6ul_14x14_evk: Fix DDR calibration values

Thanks very much for your efforts Fabio, On 08/29/2016 11:06 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Eric, > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> wrote: > >> Things are working well using your config patch: >> http://pastebin.com/crAe

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] mx6: ddr: Adjust MDREF register settings for MX6UL

ms to mean that the NXP U-Boot fork has this setting, but this isn't an explanation of why. > DATA 4 0x021B0020 0x0800 > > ,which means: > > REF_SEL = 0 -->Periodic refresh cycle: 64kHz > REFR = 1 ---> Refresh Rate - 2 refreshes > > So adjust the MDREF initial

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/3] mx6ul_14x14_ev: Enable the CCGR clocks earlier

42,11 +842,11 @@ static void spl_dram_init(void) > > void board_init_f(ulong dummy) > { > + ccgr_init(); > + > /* setup AIPS and disable watchdog */ > arch_cpu_init(); > > - ccgr_init(); > - > /* iomux and setup of i2c */ &g

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx6ul_14x14_evk: Fix DDR calibration values

Hi Fabio, On 08/29/2016 10:00 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: > On 08/29/2016 04:58 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Fabio Estevam <feste...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.este...@nxp.com> >>> >>> When runnin

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx6ul_14x14_evk: Fix DDR calibration values

ve a >> hang when going into the lowest operational point of cpufreq. >> >> Comparing the DDR calibration values against NXP U-Boot showed >> that the values were incorrect. >> >> Adjust the calibration values so that we can avoid such system hang. >&

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] gunzip: cache-align write buffer memory

*src, int len, > > s.next_in = src + i; > s.avail_in = payload_size+8; > - writebuf = (unsigned char *)malloc(szwritebuf); > + writebuf = (unsigned char *)malloc_cache_aligned(szwritebuf); > > /* decompress until deflate stream ends or end of file */ >

Re: [U-Boot] mx6ul_14x14_evk

Hi Fabio, On 08/28/2016 07:47 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> wrote: >> On 08/28/2016 01:59 PM, Eric Nelson wrote: >>> Hi Fabio, Peng, and all. >>> >>> I just ran into a problem with bus frequency

Re: [U-Boot] mx6ul_14x14_evk

On 08/28/2016 01:59 PM, Eric Nelson wrote: > Hi Fabio, Peng, and all. > > I just ran into a problem with bus frequency switching > on the EVK and there appears to be a U-Boot component. > > Using the 4.1.15 kernel from git.freescale.com (commit a4d2a08) > and the latest U-Bo

[U-Boot] mx6ul_14x14_evk

Hi Fabio, Peng, and all. I just ran into a problem with bus frequency switching on the EVK and there appears to be a U-Boot component. Using the 4.1.15 kernel from git.freescale.com (commit a4d2a08) and the latest U-Boot from Stefano's imx tree (commit a3e5519) causes the EVK to hang during a

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 00/12] imx: mx6: add virtual mx6memcal board

Hi Tim, On 08/26/2016 08:00 AM, Tim Harvey wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> wrote: >> This patch set makes use of the dynamic DDR calibration routines added in >> commit >> d339f16 to define an alternative to the Frees

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] arm: imx-common: add SECURE_BOOT option to Kconfig

Hi Gary, On 08/24/2016 03:12 AM, Gary Bisson wrote: > Hi Eric, all, > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 05:24:48PM -0700, Eric Nelson wrote: >> Nicely done Gary! >> >> On 08/23/2016 02:55 PM, Gary Bisson wrote: >>> So the option can easily be selected through men

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] nitrogen6x: add secure boot support

Hi Gary, On 08/23/2016 02:55 PM, Gary Bisson wrote: > Selecting the proper options to enable the build of the HAB tools. > > Also adding a CSF section to the imx final image so it can contain > the signature information. > > Note, this support is disabled by default, one will have to select >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] arm: imx-common: introduce back usec2ticks

Hi Gary and Peng, On 08/23/2016 02:55 PM, Gary Bisson wrote: > From: Peng Fan > > This commit "2bb014820c49a63902103bac710bc86b5772e843" > do some clean up to use the code in lib/time.c. > But usec2ticks is still being used by security related job ring code. > Bring back

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] arm: imx-common: add SECURE_BOOT option to Kconfig

Nicely done Gary! On 08/23/2016 02:55 PM, Gary Bisson wrote: > So the option can easily be selected through menuconfig. > > Signed-off-by: Gary Bisson > --- > arch/arm/imx-common/Kconfig | 9 + > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git

[U-Boot] [PATCH] mx6ul_14x14_evk: don't use array for SD2 card detect pad

Only a single pad is changed to change sdhc2_dat3 from an SDIO pin to and from GPIO4:5, so remove the array and use the imx_iomux_v3_setup_pad() routine. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> --- board/freescale/mx6ul_14x14_evk/mx6ul_14x14_evk.c | 24 ++-

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 01/12] imx: mx6: ddr: return output of calibration routines

On 06/22/2016 04:57 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 06/23/2016 01:52 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: >> Hi Marek, >> >> On 06/22/2016 04:18 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: >>> On 06/21/2016 08:41 PM, Eric Nelson wrote: >>>> Allow the calibration data from mmdc_do_write_level_ca

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 01/12] imx: mx6: ddr: return output of calibration routines

Hi Marek, On 06/22/2016 04:18 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 06/21/2016 08:41 PM, Eric Nelson wrote: >> Allow the calibration data from mmdc_do_write_level_calibration >> and mmdc_do_dqs_calibration to be returned to the caller for >> display. >> >> Signed-off

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 06/12] imx: mx6: ddr: use Kconfig for inclusion of DDR calibration

Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/Kconfig | 5 + arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/ddr.c| 2 +- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6-ddr.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/Kconfig

[U-Boot] i.MX SPL tools (was Re: [RFC PATCH 00/12] imx: mx6: add virtual mx6memcal board)

On 06/21/2016 11:41 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: > This patch set makes use of the dynamic DDR calibration routines added in > commit > d339f16 to define an alternative to the Freescale DDR stress tester tool. > Hi all, While preparing this patch set, I thought again about the t

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 12/12] mx6memcal: add configuration mx6memcal_warpboard_defconfig

Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> --- Note that I haven't tested this board because I don't currently have one. configs/mx6memcal_warpboard_defconfig | 32 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+) create mode 100644 configs/mx6memcal_warpboard_defconfig

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 05/12] novena: pass mx6_ddr_sysinfo to calibration routines

Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> --- board/kosagi/novena/novena_spl.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/board/kosagi/novena/novena_spl.c b/board/kosagi/novena/novena_spl.c index 9b18187..39b846f 100644 --- a/board/kosagi/novena/novena_spl.c

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 00/12] imx: mx6: add virtual mx6memcal board

for a board that isn't supported in main-line U-Boot (nitrogen6_max). Eric Nelson (12): imx: mx6: ddr: return output of calibration routines novena: supply calibration parameter to DDR calibration routines imx: mx6: ddr: make calibration optional in config routines imx: mx6: ddr: pass

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 03/12] imx: mx6: ddr: make calibration optional in config routines

Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/ddr.c | 44 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/ddr.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/ddr.c index bde6fe3..eb2d000 100644 --- a/ar

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 09/12] mx6memcal: add configuration mx6memcal_mx6slevk_defconfig

Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> --- configs/mx6memcal_mx6slevk_defconfig | 30 ++ 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) create mode 100644 configs/mx6memcal_mx6slevk_defconfig diff --git a/configs/mx6memcal_mx6slevk_defconfig b/c

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 08/12] mx6: Add board mx6memcal for use in validating DDR

_defconfig configures the board for use with mx6sabresd or mx6qsabreauto. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/Kconfig| 9 + board/freescale/mx6memcal/Kconfig | 135 ++ board/freescale/mx6memcal/MAINTAINERS | 7 + board/freescale/mx

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 11/12] mx6memcal: add configuration mx6memcal_sabrelite_defconfig

Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> --- configs/mx6memcal_sabrelite_defconfig | 27 +++ 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+) create mode 100644 configs/mx6memcal_sabrelite_defconfig diff --git a/configs/mx6memcal_sabrelite_defconfig b/c

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 02/12] novena: supply calibration parameter to DDR calibration routines

Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> --- board/kosagi/novena/novena_spl.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/board/kosagi/novena/novena_spl.c b/board/kosagi/novena/novena_spl.c index f779bb4..9b18187 100644 --- a/board/kosagi/novena/novena_spl.c

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 10/12] mx6memcal: add configuration mx6memcal_nitrogen6_max_defconfig

Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> --- configs/mx6memcal_nitrogen6_max_defconfig | 26 ++ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) create mode 100644 configs/mx6memcal_nitrogen6_max_defconfig diff --git a/configs/mx6memcal_nitrogen6_max_defconfig b/c

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 01/12] imx: mx6: ddr: return output of calibration routines

Allow the calibration data from mmdc_do_write_level_calibration and mmdc_do_dqs_calibration to be returned to the caller for display. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/ddr.c| 29 +++-- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-m

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 07/12] novena_defconfig: select MX6_DDRCAL

Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> --- configs/novena_defconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/configs/novena_defconfig b/configs/novena_defconfig index 69e5ea9..207e8eb 100644 --- a/configs/novena_defconfig +++ b/configs/novena_defconfig @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ CONF

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 04/12] imx: mx6: ddr: pass sysinfo to calibration routines

() and assumed 64-bit support in mmdc_do_write_level_calibration(). This allows the use of the DDR calibration routines on CPU variants like i.MX6SL that only have a single MMDC port. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/ddr.c

[U-Boot] [PATCH V4, 1/6] dm: gpio: add a default gpio xlate routine

ecific versions in a handful of drivers and simplify the addition of new drivers. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com> --- V2 removes parsing of offset from the gpio_find_and_xlate routine, and only parses the offset and GPIO_AC

Re: [U-Boot] [RESEND PATCH V3 1/6] dm: gpio: add a default gpio xlate routine

Thanks Stephen, On 04/21/2016 10:03 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 04/20/2016 09:37 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: >> Many drivers use a common form of offset + flags for device >> tree nodes. e.g.: >> < 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW> >> >> This patch adds a common

[U-Boot] [PATCH] imx: mx6: mx6sl_pins: add GPIO variant for SD1_DAT5

This patch adds the IOMUX setting for using SD1_DAT5 as GPIO5:9. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6sl_pins.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6sl_pins.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/ar

[U-Boot] [RESEND PATCH V2 3/6] gpio: omap: remove gpio_xlate routine

With the addition of GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW parsing in gpio-uclass, the omap gpio driver doesn't need a custom xlate routine. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> --- V2 removes the include of drivers/gpio/omap_gpio.c | 11 --- 1

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] dm: gpio: handle GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW flag in DT

Hi Simon, On 04/20/2016 07:40 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Eric, > > On 11 April 2016 at 11:17, Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> wrote: >> On 04/11/2016 09:53 AM, Simon Glass wrote: >>> On 11 April 2016 at 10:10, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote: >

[U-Boot] [RESEND PATCH V3 1/6] dm: gpio: add a default gpio xlate routine

ecific versions in a handful of drivers and simplify the addition of new drivers. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> --- V2 removes parsing of offset from the gpio_find_and_xlate routine, and only parses the offset and GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW flag when a driver-specific xlate is unavailab

[U-Boot] [RESEND PATCH V2 4/6] gpio: pic32: remove gpio_xlate routine

With the addition of GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW parsing in gpio-uclass, the pic32 gpio driver doesn't need a custom xlate routine. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Purna Chandra Mandal <purna.man...@microchip.com> --- V2 r

[U-Boot] [RESEND PATCH V2 6/6] gpio: exynos(s5p): remove gpio_xlate routine

With the addition of GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW parsing in gpio-uclass, the Exynos/S5P gpio driver doesn't need a custom xlate routine. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> Acked-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.k...@samsung.com> --- V2 removes the in

[U-Boot] [RESEND PATCH V2 5/6] gpio: rk: remove gpio_xlate routine

With the addition of GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW parsing in gpio-uclass, the Rockchip gpio driver doesn't need a custom xlate routine. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> --- V2 removes the include of drivers/gpio/rk_gpio.c | 11 ---

[U-Boot] [RESEND PATCH 0/6] Handle GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW in gpio-uclass

xlate is still needed. [1] - http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2016-March/thread.html#249946 [2] - https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/597363/ Eric Nelson (7): dm: gpio: handle GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW flag in DT gpio: intel_broadwell: remove gpio_xlate routine gpio: omap: remove gpio_xlate

[U-Boot] [RESEND PATCH V2 2/6] gpio: intel_broadwell: remove gpio_xlate routine

With the addition of GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW parsing in gpio-uclass, the intel_broadwell driver doesn't need a custom xlate routine. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> --- Nothing changed in V2. drivers/gpio/intel_broadwell_gpio.c | 10 -

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx6ul_evk: Remove SPL support

Hi Fabio, On 04/19/2016 05:45 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Eric, > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> wrote: > >> Do you have details of which cards are failing and how? > > The brand that fails is SanDisk 8GB microSD HC I (4). >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx6ul_evk: Remove SPL support

Hi Fabio, On 04/19/2016 01:13 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Otavio Salvador > wrote: > >> This is a huge step back; why it cannot be fixed in the SPL properly? > > Maybe it can, but as explained in the commit log, there is no such

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] gunzip.c: use block layer for writes

Thanks Stephen, On 04/12/2016 09:45 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 04/11/2016 04:21 PM, Eric Nelson wrote: >> Call blk_dwrite to ensure that the block cache is notified >> if enabled and remove build breakage when CONFIG_BLK is enabled. > > Reviewed-by: Stephen Warre

[U-Boot] [PATCH] gunzip.c: use block layer for writes

Call blk_dwrite to ensure that the block cache is notified if enabled and remove build breakage when CONFIG_BLK is enabled. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> --- lib/gunzip.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/gunzip.c b/lib/gunzip.c

[U-Boot] [PATCH V3 1/6] dm: gpio: add a default gpio xlate routine

ecific versions in a handful of drivers and simplify the addition of new drivers. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> --- V2 removes parsing of offset from the gpio_find_and_xlate routine, and only parses the offset and GPIO_AC

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 1/6] dm: gpio: add a default gpio xlate routine

Hi Stephen, On 04/11/2016 10:16 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 04/11/2016 11:00 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: >> Many drivers use a common form of offset + flags for device >> tree nodes. e.g.: >> < 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW> >> >> This patch adds a common implementati

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] dm: gpio: handle GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW flag in DT

On 04/11/2016 09:53 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi, > > On 11 April 2016 at 10:10, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote: >> On 04/11/2016 09:12 AM, Simon Glass wrote: >>> >>> Hi Eric, >>> >>> On 11 April 2016 at 09:10, Eric Nelson <

[U-Boot] [PATCH V2 6/6] gpio: exynos(s5p): remove gpio_xlate routine

With the addition of GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW parsing in gpio-uclass, the Exynos/S5P gpio driver doesn't need a custom xlate routine. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> --- V2 removes the include of drivers/gpio/s5p_gpio.c | 11 ---

[U-Boot] [PATCH V2 1/6] dm: gpio: add a default gpio xlate routine

ecific versions in a handful of drivers and simplify the addition of new drivers. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> --- drivers/gpio/gpio-uclass.c | 26 +++--- include/asm-generic/gpio.h | 19 ++- 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

[U-Boot] [PATCH V2 3/6] gpio: omap: remove gpio_xlate routine

With the addition of GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW parsing in gpio-uclass, the omap gpio driver doesn't need a custom xlate routine. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> --- V2 removes the include of drivers/gpio/omap_gpio.c | 11 --- 1

[U-Boot] [PATCH V2 0/6] Handle GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW in gpio-uclass

ch set removes parsing of offset from the gpio_find_and_xlate routine, and only parses the offset and GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW flag when a driver-specific xlate is unavailable. V2 also drops the update to the tegra_gpio driver. Eric Nelson (6): dm: gpio: add a default gpio xlate routine gpio: intel_bro

[U-Boot] [PATCH V2 4/6] gpio: pic32: remove gpio_xlate routine

With the addition of GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW parsing in gpio-uclass, the pic32 gpio driver doesn't need a custom xlate routine. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> --- V2 removes the include of drivers/gpio/pic32_gpio.c | 10 -- 1

[U-Boot] [PATCH V2 5/6] gpio: rk: remove gpio_xlate routine

With the addition of GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW parsing in gpio-uclass, the Rockchip gpio driver doesn't need a custom xlate routine. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> --- V2 removes the include of drivers/gpio/rk_gpio.c | 11 ---

[U-Boot] [PATCH V2 2/6] gpio: intel_broadwell: remove gpio_xlate routine

With the addition of GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW parsing in gpio-uclass, the intel_broadwell driver doesn't need a custom xlate routine. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> --- Nothing changed in V2. drivers/gpio/intel_broadwell_gpio.c | 10 -

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] dm: gpio: handle GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW flag in DT

Hi Simon, On 04/11/2016 07:59 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > On 11 April 2016 at 08:55, Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> wrote: >> On 04/11/2016 07:47 AM, Simon Glass wrote: >>> On 10 April 2016 at 08:48, Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> wrote: >>>> On 04/09/2016 11:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] dm: gpio: mxc: implement xlate function

Hi Peng, On 04/10/2016 10:28 PM, Peng Fan wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 09:32:51PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: >> On 14 March 2016 at 23:48, Peng Fan wrote: >>> To i.MX controller, we use such as "< 3 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>" for >>> a device to refer a gpio pin in device tree.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] dm: gpio: handle GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW flag in DT

Hi Simon, On 04/11/2016 07:47 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Eric, > > On 10 April 2016 at 08:48, Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> wrote: >> Hi Simon, >> >> On 04/09/2016 11:33 AM, Simon Glass wrote: >>> On 4 April 2016 at 11:50, Stephen Warren <swar...@w

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 7/7] gpio: tegra: remove flags parsing in xlate routine

On 04/10/2016 07:45 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: > On 04/09/2016 11:34 AM, Simon Glass wrote: >> On 5 April 2016 at 16:09, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote: >>> On 04/01/2016 09:47 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: >>>> >>>> With the ad

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] dm: gpio: handle GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW flag in DT

Hi Simon, On 04/09/2016 11:33 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > On 4 April 2016 at 11:50, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote: >> On 04/03/2016 08:07 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: >>> On 04/02/2016 08:37 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >>>> On 04/02/2016 09:13 AM, Eric Nel

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 7/7] gpio: tegra: remove flags parsing in xlate routine

Thanks for the feedback Simon. On 04/09/2016 11:34 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > On 5 April 2016 at 16:09, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote: >> On 04/01/2016 09:47 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: >>> >>> With the addition of GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW parsing in gpio-ucla

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 2/2] mmc: add support for block device cache

Hi Simon, On 04/09/2016 10:55 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > On 20 March 2016 at 16:54, Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> wrote: >> On 03/20/2016 03:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 12:35:53PM -0700, Eric Nelson wrote: >>>> On 03/17/2016 02:23 PM, Steph

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] dm: gpio: handle GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW flag in DT

Hi Stephen and Peng, On 04/02/2016 08:37 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 04/02/2016 09:13 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: >> On 04/01/2016 10:46 PM, Peng Fan wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 01:41:04PM -0700, Eric Nelson wrote: >>>> On 03/28/2016 09:57 PM, Peng Fan wrote: &g

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] dm: gpio: handle GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW flag in DT

Hi Peng, On 04/01/2016 10:46 PM, Peng Fan wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 01:41:04PM -0700, Eric Nelson wrote: >> On 03/28/2016 09:57 PM, Peng Fan wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 01:12:11PM -0700, Eric Nelson wrote: >>>> Device tree parsing of GPIO nod

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] cmd: blkcache: simplify sub-command handling

Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> --- cmd/blkcache.c | 6 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/cmd/blkcache.c b/cmd/blkcache.c index d97bed5..1338dbd 100644 --- a/cmd/blkcache.c +++ b/cmd/blkcache.c @@ -73,12 +73,10 @@ static int do_blkcache(cmd

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] drivers: block: fix placement of parameters

Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> --- include/blk.h | 34 ++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/blk.h b/include/blk.h index 263a791..f624671 100644 --- a/include/blk.h +++ b/include/blk.h @@ -96,10 +96,9 @@

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] cmd: blkcache: remove indentation from output of 'show'

Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> --- cmd/blkcache.c | 10 +- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/cmd/blkcache.c b/cmd/blkcache.c index 725163a..d97bed5 100644 --- a/cmd/blkcache.c +++ b/cmd/blkcache.c @@ -16,11 +16,11 @@ static int blkc_show(cmd

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3] minor blkcache updates

This set of updates addresses a number of small coding style issues caught by Stephen Warren's review of the block cache patch set. Eric Nelson (3): cmd: blkcache: remove indentation from output of 'show' cmd: blkcache: simplify sub-command handling drivers: block: formatting: fix placement

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 1/3] drivers: block: add block device cache

Hi Stephen, On 04/01/2016 07:07 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 04/01/2016 05:16 PM, Eric Nelson wrote: >> On 04/01/2016 03:57 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> On 03/31/2016 02:24 PM, Eric Nelson wrote: >>>> On 03/30/2016 02:57 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >>>>&

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, V3, 1/3] drivers: block: add block device cache

Hi Tom, On 04/01/2016 06:59 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 10:05:44AM -0700, Eric Nelson wrote: > >> Add a block device cache to speed up repeated reads of block devices by >> various filesystems. >> >> This small amount of cache can dramatically spe

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 1/3] drivers: block: add block device cache

On 04/01/2016 04:41 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 04:16:42PM -0700, Eric Nelson wrote: >> Hi Stephen, >> >> On 04/01/2016 03:57 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> On 03/31/2016 02:24 PM, Eric Nelson wrote: >>>> On 03/30/2016 02:57 PM, Stephen

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 1/3] drivers: block: add block device cache

Hi Stephen, On 04/01/2016 03:57 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 03/31/2016 02:24 PM, Eric Nelson wrote: >> On 03/30/2016 02:57 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> On 03/30/2016 11:34 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: >>>> On 03/30/2016 07:36 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: >>>>&

[U-Boot] [PATCH 7/7] gpio: tegra: remove flags parsing in xlate routine

With the addition of GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW parsing in gpio-uclass, it is no longer necessary for the tegra-specific xlate function to do this. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> --- drivers/gpio/tegra_gpio.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/tegra_gp

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/7] dm: gpio: handle GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW flag in DT

of the driver-specific xlate routines. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> --- drivers/gpio/gpio-uclass.c | 12 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-uclass.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-uclass.c index b58d4e6..a3cbb83 100644 --- a/drivers/gpi

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/7] Handle GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW in gpio-uclass

xlate is still needed. [1] - http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2016-March/thread.html#249946 [2] - https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/597363/ Eric Nelson (7): dm: gpio: handle GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW flag in DT gpio: intel_broadwell: remove gpio_xlate routine gpio: omap: remove gpio_xlate

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/7] gpio: omap: remove gpio_xlate routine

With the addition of GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW parsing in gpio-uclass, the omap gpio driver doesn't need a custom xlate routine. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> --- drivers/gpio/omap_gpio.c | 10 -- 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/omap_gpio.c b/driver

[U-Boot] [PATCH 6/7] gpio: exynos(s5p): remove gpio_xlate routine

With the addition of GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW parsing in gpio-uclass, the Exynos/S5P gpio driver doesn't need a custom xlate routine. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> --- drivers/gpio/s5p_gpio.c | 10 -- 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/s5p_gpio.c b/d

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/7] gpio: pic32: remove gpio_xlate routine

With the addition of GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW parsing in gpio-uclass, the pic32 gpio driver doesn't need a custom xlate routine. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> --- drivers/gpio/pic32_gpio.c | 9 - 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/pic32_gpio.c b/driver

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/7] gpio: intel_broadwell: remove gpio_xlate routine

With the addition of GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW parsing in gpio-uclass, the intel_broadwell driver doesn't need a custom xlate routine. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> --- drivers/gpio/intel_broadwell_gpio.c | 10 -- 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/driver

[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/7] gpio: rk: remove gpio_xlate routine

With the addition of GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW parsing in gpio-uclass, the Rockchip gpio driver doesn't need a custom xlate routine. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <e...@nelint.com> --- drivers/gpio/rk_gpio.c | 10 -- 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/rk_gpio.c b/driver

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] dm: gpio: handle GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW flag in DT

Hi Peng, On 03/28/2016 09:57 PM, Peng Fan wrote: > Hi Eric, > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 01:12:11PM -0700, Eric Nelson wrote: >> Device tree parsing of GPIO nodes is currently ignoring flags. >> >> Add support for GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW by checking for the presence >>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 1/3] drivers: block: add block device cache

Hi Stephen, On 03/30/2016 02:57 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 03/30/2016 11:34 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: >> Thanks again for the detailed review, Stephen. >> >> On 03/30/2016 07:36 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> On 03/28/2016 11:05 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: >>>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 1/3] drivers: block: add block device cache

Hi Tom, On 03/30/2016 08:19 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 08:36:21AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 03/28/2016 11:05 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: >>> Add a block device cache to speed up repeated reads of block devices by >>> various filesystems. >&

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 1/3] drivers: block: add block device cache

Thanks again for the detailed review, Stephen. On 03/30/2016 07:36 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 03/28/2016 11:05 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: >> Add a block device cache to speed up repeated reads of block devices by >> various filesystems. >> >> + >

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >