On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On 02/14/2013 03:35:13 PM, Matthew McClintock wrote:
+#if defined(CONFIG_SYS_BR2_PRELIM) defined(CONFIG_SYS_OR2_PRELIM)
+ /* for FPGA */
+ set_lbc_br(2, CONFIG_SYS_BR2_PRELIM);
+ set_lbc_or(2,
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On 02/18/2013 01:07:53 PM, Matthew McClintock wrote:
@@ -118,6 +172,7 @@
* Localbus non-cacheable
* 0xe000_ 0xe80f_ Promjet/free128M non-cacheable
* 0xe800_ 0xefff_ FLASH
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
This saved 640 bytes on MPC8536DS (a board with two of the six
ports defined).
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com
I noticed the same issue on SPL builds.
Ack.
-M
---
drivers/serial/serial_ns16550.c
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Matthew McClintock m...@freescale.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On 10/31/2012 01:17:31 AM, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote:
On 10/31/2012 02:37 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 10/30/2012 04:26:16 AM, Prabhakar
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On 10/31/2012 01:17:31 AM, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote:
On 10/31/2012 02:37 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 10/30/2012 04:26:16 AM, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote:
I'd rather not see this split this up. This file is too much of a
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Stefan Roese s...@denx.de wrote:
On 09/27/2012 10:43 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
By calling fdt_chosen(), the chosen node will be updated /
created by the fdt boardsetup command. This is useful for
setting of the kernel commandline via the bootargs
env
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Sep 26, 2012, at 9:20 AM, Stefan Roese wrote:
Hi Kumar,
On 09/26/2012 03:36 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
By calling fdt_chosen(), the chosen node will be updated /
created by the fdt boardsetup command. This is useful
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Timur Tabi ti...@freescale.com wrote:
Scott Wood wrote:
The 512K limit is arbitrary and can be changed. It exists just to
provide a stable start address on something that grows from the end of
flash.
True, but we haven't actually done changed it. Instead of
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On 08/13/2012 01:10 PM, Matthew McClintock wrote:
We have a requirement to wait a period of time before enabling the
DDR controller
Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock m...@freescale.com
---
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On 08/13/2012 01:10 PM, Matthew McClintock wrote:
Let's use the more appropriate udelay for the nand_spl. While we
can't make use of u-boot's full udelay we can atl east use a for
loop that won't get optimized away
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On 08/13/2012 06:14 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On 08/13/2012 01:10 PM, Matthew McClintock wrote:
Let's use the more appropriate udelay
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On 08/13/2012 01:10 PM, Matthew McClintock wrote:
This change reduces the SPL size by removing the redundant syncs produced
by out_be32 and just replies on one final sync
Done with:
sed -r '/in_be32/b;
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On 08/13/2012 06:31 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On 08/13/2012 01:10 PM, Matthew McClintock wrote:
This change reduces the SPL size
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
LAW init is skipped in the SPL payload because it's assumed that the SPL
has taken care of it -- so make sure the SPL loads all the LAWs as is
done on other boards.
It might be good to try this on a few different
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Matthew McClintock m...@freescale.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
LAW init is skipped in the SPL payload because it's assumed that the SPL
has taken care of it -- so make sure the SPL loads all the LAWs as is
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Marek,
In message 201207191452.53818.ma...@denx.de you wrote:
please apply this into the current release. I'm hereby commiting seppuku.
PLEASE send such pull reqeusts to the mailing list, so everybody can
see it.
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
Dear McClintock Matthew-B29882,
[...]
I think this merge is causing issues. Resetting to the previous merge
(ad8439d Merge branch 'sf' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-blackfin) and
the issues go away.
-M
Generating include
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On 05/18/2012 11:04 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
+#elif defined(CONFIG_NAND_U_BOOT)
+#define CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_NAND
+#define CONFIG_ENV_SIZE CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BLOCK_SIZE
+#define CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET ((512 * 1024)
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On 05/18/2012 12:08 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
Scott Wood wrote:
It was over a year ago that I made that request internally. And still
the answer is I need this now now now!.
Who's going to do that work, if not you?
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Timur Tabi ti...@freescale.com wrote:
Scott Wood wrote:
NACK, please use SPD.
Also please use the new SPL infrastructure.
I'm just taking the patches as they are on the SDK and posting them. I
have no idea how the new SPL infrastructure works.
If you're
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On 03/21/2012 07:58 PM, Graeme Russ wrote:
Hello Custodians and Mailing List Aficionados,
I don't know if anyone has noticed, but patchwork is starting to collect
a rather large amount of cruft.
Do we, or do we not have the
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Joe Kulikauskas
joe.kulikaus...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Does anybody happen to know a reference with _details_ of how to format and
mkfs an SD card to be bootable for freescale platform?
Background: I'm using a freescale utility (
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
Shouldn't libgcc provide this?
It's not being provided by certain toolchains...
-M
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote:
Well there is a reason why one should stick to ELDK ;-)
It depends on what version of GCC you want to use as well.
-M
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Ira W. Snyder i...@ovro.caltech.edu wrote:
Does the board really support different DDR freq or is this copy / paste?
The memory is an SODIMM, but the RAM is configured before U-Boot runs by
the Freescale On-Chip ROM. See above comment.
If this is a P2020 you
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Ira W. Snyder i...@ovro.caltech.edu wrote:
Yep, this is a P2020.
I'll check the Freescale documentation. Hopefully it provides an example
of how to configure the On-Chip ROM to use L2SRAM instead of DDR.
I'll try and find a U-Boot port that configures DDR
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Ira W. Snyder i...@ovro.caltech.edu wrote:
Thanks. That config_sram.dat is exactly what I came up with.
I have my board booting via L2SRAM, but the DDR doesn't get configured
correctly yet. I'm trying to figure out how the DDR SPD stuff works in
U-Boot. I've
Adding York who might be able to help more...
-M
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Ira W. Snyder i...@ovro.caltech.edu wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 09:07:23PM +, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Ira W. Snyder i...@ovro.caltech.edu wrote:
Thanks
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Timur Tabi ti...@freescale.com wrote:
I boot off of SDCARD (P2020COME_SDCARD_config). To write the U-Boot
image to the microSD card, I use a tool provided with the BSP called
boot_format-1.0.0. Maybe you are familiar with it?
I think that qualifies as
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
am i the only one seeing errors like:
board/esd/cpciiser4/libcpciiser4.o: In function `board_early_init_f':
board/esd/cpciiser4/cpciiser4.c:139: undefined reference to `_restgpr_26_x'
i'm using a gcc-4.5.x toolchain
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Huang Changming-R66093
r66...@freescale.com wrote:
How can I deal with the new board and old board?
Check the board revision at runtime.
Board Specification says, there is one EEPROM to contain all board history,
and I found it:
On I2C2 bus, there is one
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Huang Changming-R66093
r66...@freescale.com wrote:
No, I have two boards, one was used for BSP development, and the other was
ordered in Aug.
$ make mpc8360emds_newmodifier
It make sense.
Kim's way makes more sense if those values are different though.
-M
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Ira W. Snyder i...@ovro.caltech.edu wrote:
The documentation Freescale sent me claims that U-Boot is in a 4MB SPI
flash, however, the U-Boot that came with the board is unable to
initialize the SPI subsystem per their instructions.
= sf probe 0
SF:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Ira W. Snyder i...@ovro.caltech.edu wrote:
I'm using the U-Boot that came on the board: 2009.11-V100R00. I have not
changed any DIP switches. My boot log is below.
I think this version is missing stuff for SPI to work. Can you try a
newer version? This board
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Perhaps having a CONFIG_TARGET_IMAGE available and having just one
generic TARGET available?
ifdef CONFIG_TARGET_IMAGE
ALL += $(CONFIG_TARGET_IMAGE)
endif
TARGET_IMAGE_OBJS-y += various.bin
TARGET_IMAGE_OBJS-y +=
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Did you not see the other patch in the same series that makes use of
this feature? It's not about actually typing it out. Let me know if
you need help finding patch 3/4.
It does not matter if you add it here and use it there.
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
+ifndef CONFIG_IN_BOOTSTRAP
+ifeq ($(CONFIG_SPIFLASH), y)
+ALL += $(obj)u-boot-spi.bin
+endif
+
+ifeq ($(CONFIG_SDCARD), y)
+ALL += $(obj)u-boot-sd.bin
+endif
+endif
I really dislike to have this in the top level
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Bear jiling...@gmail.com wrote:
Once you have a working NAND, you can replace the NOR image, switching
back to NAND if the new NOR image is broken.
And of course be careful not to write to the wrong flash, and destroy your
backup boot source.
Thanks for your
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 2:56 AM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
I see absolutely no sense in this, We already have a way to specify
such arguments, as you write yourself in your commit message. Your
new way is just more complicated, more typing effort, and as such just
useless overhead.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
diff --git a/common/cmd_usb.c b/common/cmd_usb.c
index b5731a7..efec895 100644
--- a/common/cmd_usb.c
+++ b/common/cmd_usb.c
@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ int do_usbboot(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char
* const argv[])
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Friday, June 03, 2011 14:36:03 Matthew McClintock wrote:
+if [ -z ${options} ] ; then
+ options=$EXTRA_OPTS
+else
+ options=$options,$EXTRA_OPTS
+fi
this can be simplified (or at least done in one line)
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
any reason you couldnt add silent=0 to CONFIG_EXTRA_ENV_SETTINGS ?
I was just perturbed that setting CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE did not
actually make the console silent -
Ugh. I just messed that up. Ignore this patch series.
-M
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:27 PM, y...@right.am.freescale.net wrote:
From: Matthew McClintock m...@freescale.com
Just setting CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE does not make the CONSOLE
silent without the silent env variable set. This adds a new
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
actually, if you dont mind, i'd like to obsolete this patch with the one
below. what do you think ?
-mike
diff --git a/common/cmd_bootm.c b/common/cmd_bootm.c
index 18019d6..c5c169f 100644
--- a/common/cmd_bootm.c
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
I don't tink this will work since if we undef CONFIG_CMD_BOOTM we
don't even compile common/cmd_bootm.c.
please double check the patch where it modifies the header
Sorry. I did not get that far. Yes this looks good.
ACK
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
void __weak flush_icache(void)
{
/* please define arch specific flush_icache */
puts(No arch specific flush_icache available!\n);
}
This syntax does not quite work for me... how about something like:
void
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
When building for MPC8315ERDB_NAND, I get:
nand_boot_fsl_elbc.c: In function 'nand_load':
nand_boot_fsl_elbc.c:54:20: error: 'CONFIG_NAND_OR_PRELIM' undeclared (first
use in this function)
nand_boot_fsl_elbc.c:54:20:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
We are trying to access the I2C bus before relocation from flash to read
switch settings. Using the current CONFIG_SYS_SPD_BUS_NUM define to do this
is fine for our needs however I would like to ask if we wanted to change
this
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
the setting of pmuxcr? SW has to do that.
But we don't do this based off the switch value currently on
p1_p2_rdb_pc boards.
-M
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
+ if (i2c_data 0x1) {
+ setbits_be32(gur-pmuxcr, MPC85xx_PMUXCR_SD_DATA);
+ puts(SD/MMC : 8-bit Mode\n);
+ puts(eSPI : Disabled\n);
+
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Alden, Kevin kal...@srcinc.com wrote:
I have a custom board based on the Freescale P2020 RDB. I am having trouble
getting through the entire boot sequence. Basically, I can't get a
breakpoint to hit in board_init_r.
What version of u-boot are you using? Do
51 matches
Mail list logo
