On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> wrote: > On 08/13/2012 06:31 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> wrote: >>> On 08/13/2012 01:10 PM, Matthew McClintock wrote: >>>> This change reduces the SPL size by removing the redundant syncs produced >>>> by out_be32 and just replies on one final sync >>>> >>>> Done with: >>>> >>>> sed -r '/in_be32/b; s/(out_be32)\(([^,]*),\s+(.*)\)/__raw_writel(\3, >>>> \2)/g' -i `git grep --name-only sdram_init nand_spl/` >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock <m...@freescale.com> >>>> --- >>>> nand_spl/board/freescale/p1010rdb/nand_boot.c | 54 >>>> ++++++++++----------- >>>> nand_spl/board/freescale/p1023rds/nand_boot.c | 42 ++++++++-------- >>>> nand_spl/board/freescale/p1_p2_rdb_pc/nand_boot.c | 48 >>>> +++++++++--------- >>>> 3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-) >>> >>> This should come first if the other patches break without it, to >>> preserve bisectability. >> >> I think they all work on at least some compilers.... not that that's >> extremely helpful. > > Was this patch meant to free up room for the other patches, or was it > just bundled in because it's touching the same code?
I believe I was tasked with fixing builds on our newer toolchains (or was it older toolchains?) since some combinations ran out of space. The exact reasoning escapes me, also why did it last a well... I can reorder them if you would like... -M _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
