Hi Marek,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:10:08PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Robert Schwebel
> >
> > csb226 xscale/pxa
> > innokom xscale/pxa
>
> Drop unless I get fixes from maintainer in a week or request for
> longer time to fix. (here I
Hi Marek,
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 12:44:23AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> board/denx/m28evk/power_init.c | 913
> ++
Shouldn't the power library functions go into
arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx28/? They are not m28evk specific and should be
re-usable by other MX2
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 11:42:31AM +1000, Graeme Russ wrote:
> It sounds like you might be looking at using U-Boot for booting a x86
> PC. If this is the case, maybe you should take a look at coreboot
> (http://www.coreboot.org/)
For what it's worth: we have a beginning of x86 support in Barebox
t; or also from git:
>
> git clone http://git.denx.de/git/u-boot-v2.git
Note also that there is now a separate mailing list for v2:
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/u-boot-v2
Regards,
Robert Schwebel
--
Pengutronix e.K. |
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:05:41PM +0200, Johann Steinbrecher wrote:
> which patches are required in order to get a lcd support for the imx27
> during the boot up? Is this function already supported? Is there a patch
> that initialized the LCD and DMA controller?
u-boot-v2 has initial support for
Hi Remy,
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 09:49:31PM +0200, Remy Bohmer wrote:
> > Freescale isnt alone here, so when/if u-boot goes GPLv3, please dont do your
> > own thing in a vacuum. there will be others who would support a GPLv2
> > split,
> > so we might as well collaborate. u-boot-v2 looks fairly
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 11:18:14AM +0200, brice.wal...@ulp.u-strasbg.fr
wrote:
> J've seen that U-Boot V2 supports different MX27 CPU boards. Is U-Boot
> supported on Freescale i.MX27 PDK board?
The tree contains support for the MX27ADS but not for the PDK; however,
it is not very well tested beca
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 12:11:52AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > +#define CONFIG_BOARDINFO"Phytec Phycore mpc5200b tiny"
>
> Too long. Please be terse.
The official name of the board is "phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny".
rsc
--
Pengutronix e.K. |
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 01:12:07AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > How can you possibly ever change the API for the flash driver with 201
> > different flash drivers in the tree without marking something as broken?
>
> Well, *if* we wanted to change the API, that would be a reason to get
> rid of t
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 07:22:31PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Dear Jon Smirl,
> >
> > In message <9e4733910904211533s58df5764na715986b36824...@mail.gmail.com>
> > you wrote:
> >>
> >> >> - for those who look for a board name, we should supp
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 04:40:04PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > 1. Wolfgang has a focus on stability and gradual changes. We respect this
> >political position because it is a *good* one.
>
> This is not quite correct. What I consider important is an evo-
> lutionary path - this may in
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 02:29:32PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> [stupid attempt of a flame war deleted]
For the audience which is wondering about what's going on here, I have
no idea.
The idea behind B-Boot-v2 is: U-Boot itself is a *great* bootloader from
the user's poing of view. It is the be
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:42:08AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > U-Boot-v2 is used here to do real work in our projects. If it isn't
> > what you need, it is perfectly fine if you ignore it.
>
> my concern isnt really narrow to the Blackfin port. i was using it as
> a practical example. we've ta
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 09:49:38AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > If you aim for feature completeness, use v1 and don't care about v2.
> > v2 is for people who care about *design*.
>
> so v2 is good for thinking about things while v1 is good for people
> who want to do real work. if that's the st
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:56:53AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > We have even Blackfin support in v2, and that for almost all of the
> > time it is actually there. Sure - if you need feature completeness,
> > you'll have to stay with v1. Our aim is a sane design, and I'm still
> > not convinced
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 04:59:41PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> What's the summary of features that v2 has that v1 doesnt?
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-v2.git;a=blob;f=README;hb=HEAD
rsc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 03:18:32PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> so, does it make sense to look at the feature set that v2 brings to
> the table and get it into u-boot v1? ive never personally looked at
> v2, but if it means i need to redo all of my Blackfin core/board code,
> that doesnt sound ve
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 08:54:41PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> u-boot-v2 is an interesting approach in several aspects, but since it
> was made publicly visible nearly two years ago it did not collect much
> of a community around it.
Right; part of the reason is it was always something we used t
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 02:25:57PM -0700, k...@koi8.net wrote:
> > OK, thanks. Cloning now :)
>
> OK, got a look at it. Looks promising but it is in very early stage yet... I
> wouldn't say in pre-conception stage, but definitely on a very beginning of
> the first trimester :)
Well, you are free
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 01:18:45PM -0700, k...@koi8.net wrote:
> > I suppose you didn't look in the right place. We don't even have support
> > for i2c and spi in v2 :-)
>
> Ah, that's that forked one! Sorry, my bad... I thought about the new version
> of a legacy one that just shuffled source file
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 12:25:16PM -0700, k...@koi8.net wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
>
> > k...@koi8.net wrote:
> > > OK, this is _NOT_ just multiple I2C adapters... The entire thing is
> > > fundamentally broken.
> > >
> > > One supposed to have _THE_ device and only this
Hi Jerry,
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 03:19:19PM -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> k...@koi8.net wrote:
> > OK, this is _NOT_ just multiple I2C adapters... The entire thing is
> > fundamentally broken.
> >
> > One supposed to have _THE_ device and only this device is somehow supported.
> >
> > Now it is
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 10:35:08AM +0100, Jens Scharsig wrote:
> I'm start with a port for a new customer board with NOR-flash only.
> Our customer don't like use AT91Bootstrap.
>
> I look at the source, but don't found any initialization code for
> AT91SAM926x.
>
> My question:
>
> Are there an
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 03:04:56PM -0600, John Jeffers wrote:
> In "~/u-boot-v2/board/pcm038/env/config
> (and in most other boards in v2)
>
> the following is found:
> /+
> autoboot_timeout=3
>
> nfsroot="/ptx/work/octopus/rsc/svn/oselas/bsp/phytec/phyCORE-i.MX27/OSELAS.BSP-Phytec-phyCORE-i.MX
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 12:20:57PM +0100, kenneth johansson wrote:
>
> Only print out the target name during make.
> For old style set V=1
>
>
> Signed-off-by: kenneth johansson
Sidenote: u-boot-v2 uses the standard Linux build system and has quiet
operation as the default case.
rsc
--
Pengu
mments about the posted patches.
rsc
--
Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
Hannoversche Str. 2, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany
Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Fax: +49-5121-
y stops with Error 1.
For the AT91SAM9260 you need a little endian toolchain, something like
arm-v4t oder arm-v5t. You can for example use the OSELAS.Toolchain from
our website (it has a v4t toolchain).
rsc
--
Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
Pengutronix - Linux Solutio
next couple of
years.
> - a lot of time
Uuuh, that's not so easy. Code incredients tend to rot quickly when not
being served freshly from a rcs repository.
> Using the Sugo alla Bolognese we can give a name for each file of the
> toolchain...
So it might be an innovative mod
ring" revision. The resulting toolchain could have some compatiblity
issues with our users then :)
rsc
--
Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
Hannoversche Str. 2,
2, to make it more feature complete
- help porting technological things from v2 to v1, to make v1 gradually
better with the ideas invented in v2
- do nothing and see how things evolve
rsc
--
Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Indust
nterested to see examples,
Note that U-Boot-v2 has also support for the beagle board which is
Cortex A8 as well.
rsc
--
Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
Ha
ross toolchain,
built with OSELAS.Toolchain-1.1.1. You can compile such a toolchain
yourself easily with ptxdist, look here for the details:
http://www.pengutronix.de/oselas/toolchain/index_en.html
rsc
--
Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions f
32 matches
Mail list logo
