Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] nvmem: add driver handling U-Boot environment variables

On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 10:46:51PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > From: Rafał Miłecki > > U-Boot stores its setup as environment variables. It's a list of > key-value pairs stored on flash device with a custom header. > > This commit adds an NVMEM driver that: > 1. Provides NVMEM access to enviro

Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ls1046ardb: Set aqr106 phy mode to usxgmii

Hi Madalin, On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 12:59:16PM +, Madalin Bucur wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Sascha Hauer > > Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2020 1:22 PM > > To: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > > Cc: Madalin Bucur ; Shawn Guo > > ; Le

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] i.MX: mxc_ipuv3_fb: add ipuv3_fb_shutdown() routine to stop IPU before bootm

On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 07:27:41PM +0200, Stefano Babic wrote: > > > > > I would like to see a handoff of display settings from U-Boot to > > the kernel, but that's also a tricky thing as long as we're supporting > > different mechanisms (DT in main-line and kernel parameters in > > older kernels

[U-Boot] [ANNOUNCEMENT] U-Boot-v2 has its own list

Hi all, U-Boot-v2 now has its own list on infradead.org. If you are interested in U-Boot-v2 development please subscribe here: http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/u-boot-v2 So as of now all v2 related topics should go over this list. Thanks Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH U-BOOTV2] image.h: amd64 support

Hi Peter, On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:21:00PM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > Use IH_CPU_I386 for amd64 machines as well, so bootm.c is able to build > on amd64 sandbox. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard Applied, thanks. Sascha > --- > include/image.h |2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 inserti

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] Add Eukrea CPUIMX27 support

Hi Eric, On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 05:18:39PM +0200, Eric Benard wrote: > CPUIMX27 is built around Freescale's i.MX27 and has up to 64MB of > NOR Flash, up to 512MB of NAND Flash and up to 256MB of mDDR, > it includes an ethernet PHY in MII mode, an I2C RTC and a > ST16554 QuadUART on nCS3. Looks g

[U-Boot] [PATCH] remove myself as phycore/litekit Maintainer

I never acked a patch that adds me as phycore i.MX31 maintainer nor was it me who pushed the patches, so remove myself from the maintainer list so that other people do not longer wait for my ack. Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer --- MAINTAINERS |5 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/10] mx27: basic cpu support

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:10:07AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Ilya Yanok, > > In message <4a0b4f9a.8030...@emcraft.com> you wrote: > > > > >> +return 2600 / 1.5; > > > > > > We definitely do not allow any FP use in U-Boot. > > > > This will be actually converted to an

Re: [U-Boot] [u-boot v2] and i2c

Hi Heiko, On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 09:36:46AM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote: > Hello Sascha, > > I actually looked in the u-boot-v2.git in the i2c branch, > because I wanted to look how things in v2 work, specially > I2C Subsystem ... and I have a first question: Note that the I2C branch is out of

Re: [U-Boot] Build errors u-boot-v2 iMX27

On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 02:18:21PM -0400, Bill Cook wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: saschaha...@web.de [mailto:saschaha...@web.de]on Behalf Of Sascha > > Hauer > > Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 12:57 PM > > To: Bill Cook > > Cc: u-boot@lists.den

Re: [U-Boot] [ANNOUNCE] Kconfig support

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:08:38PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Sascha, > > In message <20090421182102.gz21...@pengutronix.de> you wrote: > > > > > This is not quite correct. What I consider important is an evo- > > > lutionary path - this may include bigger changes and reorganizations

Re: [U-Boot] [ANNOUNCE] Kconfig support

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 04:40:04PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Robert, > > just to put a few points right: > > In message <20090421070431.gx5...@pengutronix.de> you wrote: > > > > So our intention was and is: > > > > 1. Wolfgang has a focus on stability and gradual changes. We respect thi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] smc911x: write back the manually set MAC address

On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 01:23:37PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: > If the MAX address is given by the environment, write it back to the > hardware. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack > Cc: Sascha Hauer Acked-by: Sascha Hauer Anyway, you shouldn't rely on this. I'm the origi

Re: [U-Boot] Build errors u-boot-v2 iMX27

Hi Bill, On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:57:49AM -0400, Bill Cook wrote: > Dear ML, > > I'm trying to build u-boot-v2 for an iMX27 based board. I'm getting a > HW/SW floating point mismatch error and hope someone will point me > to a solution. Building with: > make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-eabi-

Re: [U-Boot] [ANNOUNCE] Kconfig support

On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:20:50AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 20 April 2009 10:53:39 Robert Schwebel wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:42:08AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > U-Boot-v2 is used here to do real work in our projects. If it isn't > > > > what you need, it is perf

Re: [U-Boot] [ANNOUNCE] Kconfig support

On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 04:59:41PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Apr 19, 2009, at 2:48 PM, Robert Schwebel wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 08:54:41PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>> u-boot-v2 is an interesting approach in several aspects, but since it >>> was made publicly visible nearly two

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Make flash protection work, when the environment is in EEPROM

On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:01:09PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > Hi Wolgang, > > > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 09:24:05PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > >> Dear Jon Smirl, > >> > >> In me

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] mpc5200: make i2c faster

Hi, On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 09:38:48AM -0400, Jon wrote: > From: Sascha Hauer > > The mpc5xxx i2c driver has great delays while waiting for the chip status. > make the delays smaller and the driver faster. > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer > --- > cpu/mpc5xxx/i2c.c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Make flash protection work, when the environment is in EEPROM

Hi Wolgang, On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 09:24:05PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Jon Smirl, > > In message <9e4733910903211308v63878fabx19f3327371db5...@mail.gmail.com> you > wrote: > > > > My guess is getenv() returns a pointer to the environment variable, > > not a copy of the environment var

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] i.MX31: fir imx31_phycore to work after Linux reboot

Hi, On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:32:33PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Guennadi Liakhovetski, > > In message you wrote: > > > > > In message you wrote: > > > > Upon power on i.MX31 enables most peripheral clocks, Linux disables the > > > > ones > > > > > > Why does U-Boot do that? > > >

Re: [U-Boot] IMX27 nand_probe problem

Hi, When writing about U-Boot-V2 please Cc me as I do not read this list as regularly as I should. On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:16:24PM +0100, Alessandro Chies wrote: > Good morning, > I'm try to port uboot on a my board imx27 based. It has only DDR RAM > and a > NAND flash. > UBoot runs ver

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot-v2][PATCH] imx27: nandboot with 2k pages

Hi Frederic, The patches look good in general, but unfortunately you mailer turned tabs into spaces and wrapped long lines, so the patches do not apply. Can you send them again please? one comment inline. Thanks Sascha On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 02:14:41PM +0100, frederic Rodo wrote: > Signed-of

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot for imx27 Board

On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 06:54:53PM +0530, Lejin K Joy wrote: > > Thanks a lot Sascha, > > I was able to downlaod it and I was compiling it. If you have worked on the > same platform kindly give your valuable inputs. > > I am compiling the U-boot for imx27ads board. I just updated mx27ads suppo

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot for imx27 Board

On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 02:35:43PM +0530, Lejin K Joy wrote: > Hi, > > > > I was trying to use u-boot for imx27 board. But I was not able to find uboot > for the same board. Only one available is > u-boot/u-boot-v2.git > but I was not able