Hi Marek,
On 08/12/2015 07:15 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Thursday, July 16, 2015 at 04:27:33 AM, Vikas Manocha wrote:
This patch is to separate the base trigger from the read/write transfer
start addresses.
This patch breaks the QSPI support on SoCFPGA.
ok, can you please try to debug the
Hi Marek,
On 08/12/2015 07:09 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Thursday, July 16, 2015 at 04:27:30 AM, Vikas Manocha wrote:
There is no need to check for sram fill level. If sram is empty, cpu will
go in the wait state till the time data is available from flash.
Consider the following scenario:
Hi Marek,
On 08/12/2015 07:11 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Thursday, July 16, 2015 at 04:27:31 AM, Vikas Manocha wrote:
There is no need to poll sram level before writing to flash, data going to
SRAM till sram is full, after that backpressure will take over.
Please see the question I posed in
Hi,
On 08/13/2015 10:35 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Thursday, August 13, 2015 at 05:50:18 PM, vikasm wrote:
Hi Marek,
Hi!
On 08/12/2015 07:07 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Thursday, July 16, 2015 at 04:27:29 AM, Vikas Manocha wrote:
Commit message is missing.
Actually subject of the mail
Hi Marek,
On 08/12/2015 07:07 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Thursday, July 16, 2015 at 04:27:29 AM, Vikas Manocha wrote:
Commit message is missing.
Actually subject of the mail was sufficient, this patch just moves the register
configuration in init.
Signed-off-by: Vikas Manocha
Hi Marek,
On 08/12/2015 05:26 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Thursday, August 13, 2015 at 02:16:21 AM, vikasm wrote:
Hi Marek,
On 08/12/2015 01:22 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 07:52:28 PM, vikasm wrote:
Thanks Jagan,
On 08/12/2015 05:01 AM, Jagan Teki wrote:
Vikas
Hi Marek,
On 08/12/2015 01:22 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 07:52:28 PM, vikasm wrote:
Thanks Jagan,
On 08/12/2015 05:01 AM, Jagan Teki wrote:
Vikas,
Did you verified on board, can you just verified with 'sf update' before
and after.. I just wanted to see if you
, vikasm wrote:
On 07/23/2015 05:22 AM, Stefan Roese wrote:
Hi Vikas,
On 16.07.2015 08:46, Stefan Roese wrote:
In addition can you please check the patch causing this instability
on
socfpga. I don't like to bug you but to close this patchset, this
info
tests mentioned above seems
Hi Stefan,
On 07/23/2015 05:22 AM, Stefan Roese wrote:
Hi Vikas,
On 16.07.2015 08:46, Stefan Roese wrote:
In addition can you please check the patch causing this instability on
socfpga. I don't like to bug you but to close this patchset, this info
tests mentioned above seems to be
Hi Stefan,
On 05/28/2015 11:20 PM, Stefan Roese wrote:
Hi Vikas,
(added Dinh, Graham and Marek to Cc)
On 29.05.2015 03:22, Vikas Manocha wrote:
Trigger base address can be set to the spi flash address without any
masking, here is the explanation of the register.
QSPI_IND_AHB_ADDR_TRIGGER
Hello Masahiro,
On 05/01/2015 03:32 PM, vikasm wrote:
Thanks Simon,
On 05/01/2015 03:02 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
+Masahiro, for my of_match_ptr() comment below.
Hi Vikas,
On 1 May 2015 at 15:48, Vikas Manocha vikas.mano...@st.com wrote:
This patch adds device tree support for arm pl010
Thanks Simon,
On 05/02/2015 07:26 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Vikas,
On 1 May 2015 at 18:07, Vikas Manocha vikas.mano...@st.com wrote:
This patch adds device tree for the ST Micro stv0991 board enables
device tree control. Progressively device tree support for the drivers
being used will
Thanks Simon,
On 05/01/2015 03:02 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
+Masahiro, for my of_match_ptr() comment below.
Hi Vikas,
On 1 May 2015 at 15:48, Vikas Manocha vikas.mano...@st.com wrote:
This patch adds device tree support for arm pl010/pl011 driver.
Signed-off-by: Vikas Manocha
Thanks Simon,
On 05/01/2015 04:01 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Vikas,
On 1 May 2015 at 16:43, Vikas Manocha vikas.mano...@st.com wrote:
commit message here
There is not much to add in the commit message apart from info in the title,
that is why i didn't add any message in the body. Please let
Hi Simon,
On 05/01/2015 04:45 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Vikas,
On 1 May 2015 at 17:18, vikasm vikas.mano...@st.com wrote:
Thanks Simon,
On 05/01/2015 04:01 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Vikas,
On 1 May 2015 at 16:43, Vikas Manocha vikas.mano...@st.com wrote:
commit message here
On 03/30/2015 08:48 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada yamada.masah...@socionext.com
---
arch/arm/Kconfig | 2 ++
configs/stv0991_defconfig | 2 --
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Acked-by : Vikas Manocha vikas.mano...@st.com
On 12/18/2014 09:19 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
This commit fixes warnings reported by tools/genboardscfg.py.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada yamad...@jp.panasonic.com
Cc: Vikas Manocha vikas.mano...@st.com
---
board/st/stv0991/MAINTAINERS | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git
Hello Simon,
On 11/24/2014 07:51 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Vikas,
On 24 November 2014 at 17:40, vikasm vikas.mano...@st.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 11/24/2014 07:51 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Vikas,
On 18 November 2014 at 11:59, vikasm vikas.mano...@st.com wrote:
Thanks Simon,
On 11/17/2014
Hello Simon,
On 11/18/2014 10:17 AM, vikasm wrote:
Hello Simon,
On 11/17/2014 09:19 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Vikas,
On 18 November 2014 01:30, Vikas Manocha vikas.mano...@st.com wrote:
This patchset add support for new arch stv0991.
Changes in v4:
- rebased to current master
- added
Hi Simon,
On 11/25/2014 11:50 AM, vikasm wrote:
Hello Simon,
On 11/18/2014 10:17 AM, vikasm wrote:
Hello Simon,
On 11/17/2014 09:19 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Vikas,
On 18 November 2014 01:30, Vikas Manocha vikas.mano...@st.com wrote:
This patchset add support for new arch stv0991
Hi Simon,
On 11/24/2014 07:51 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Vikas,
On 18 November 2014 at 11:59, vikasm vikas.mano...@st.com wrote:
Thanks Simon,
On 11/17/2014 09:30 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Vikas,
On 18 November 2014 00:17, Vikas Manocha vikas.mano...@st.com wrote:
This patchset fixes
Thanks Albert,
On 11/17/2014 11:21 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hello Vikas,
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:30:25 -0800, Vikas Manocha
vikas.mano...@st.com wrote:
stv0991 architecture support added. It contains the support for
following blocks
- Timer
- uart
Signed-off-by: Vikas Manocha
Hello Albert,
On 11/17/2014 11:29 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hello Vikas,
(nitpicking) can you replace '+' in the subject with 'and' ?
ok, i will submit the v5.
(nitpicking yet more) can you keep the action form for the subject
rather than action done, i.e., stv0991: enable default and
Hello Simon,
On 11/17/2014 09:19 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Vikas,
On 18 November 2014 01:30, Vikas Manocha vikas.mano...@st.com wrote:
This patchset add support for new arch stv0991.
Changes in v4:
- rebased to current master
- added maintainers info
Changes in v3:
- removed period from
Thanks Simon,
On 11/17/2014 09:30 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Vikas,
On 18 November 2014 00:17, Vikas Manocha vikas.mano...@st.com wrote:
This patchset fixes the pl01x driver esp for pl011 baudrate line
control.
Vikas Manocha (5):
serial: pl01x: pass pl01x_type to set baudrate
serial:
Hello Masahiro/Nobuhiro,
As per your comments , the changes are done in V3 patchset.
Please provide your acceptance for reviewed-by or acked-by tag ?
Rgds,
Vikas
On 09/02/2014 03:04 PM, Vikas MANOCHA wrote:
This patchset add support for new arch stv0991.
Changes in v3:
- removed period from
Thanks Nobuhiro,
On 08/25/2014 06:47 PM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Hi,
2014-08-23 4:43 GMT+09:00 Vikas Manocha vikas.mano...@st.com:
stv0991 architecture support added. It contains the support for
following blocks
- Timer
- uart
Signed-off-by: Vikas Manocha vikas.mano...@st.com
---
27 matches
Mail list logo
