Hi,
On 08/13/2015 10:35 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Thursday, August 13, 2015 at 05:50:18 PM, vikasm wrote:
>> Hi Marek,
>
> Hi!
>
>> On 08/12/2015 07:07 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On Thursday, July 16, 2015 at 04:27:29 AM, Vikas Manocha wrote:
>>>
>
Hi Marek,
On 08/12/2015 07:15 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Thursday, July 16, 2015 at 04:27:33 AM, Vikas Manocha wrote:
>> This patch is to separate the base trigger from the read/write transfer
>> start addresses.
>
> This patch breaks the QSPI support on SoCFPGA.
ok, can you please try to debug
Hi Marek,
On 08/12/2015 07:11 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Thursday, July 16, 2015 at 04:27:31 AM, Vikas Manocha wrote:
>> There is no need to poll sram level before writing to flash, data going to
>> SRAM till sram is full, after that backpressure will take over.
>
> Please see the question I pos
Hi Marek,
On 08/12/2015 07:09 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Thursday, July 16, 2015 at 04:27:30 AM, Vikas Manocha wrote:
>> There is no need to check for sram fill level. If sram is empty, cpu will
>> go in the wait state till the time data is available from flash.
>
>
> Consider the following sce
Hi Marek,
On 08/12/2015 07:07 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Thursday, July 16, 2015 at 04:27:29 AM, Vikas Manocha wrote:
>
> Commit message is missing.
Actually subject of the mail was sufficient, this patch just moves the register
configuration in init.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Vikas Manocha
>> --
Hi Marek,
On 08/12/2015 05:26 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Thursday, August 13, 2015 at 02:16:21 AM, vikasm wrote:
>> Hi Marek,
>>
>> On 08/12/2015 01:22 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 07:52:28 PM, vikasm wrote:
>>>> Than
Hi Marek,
On 08/12/2015 01:22 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 07:52:28 PM, vikasm wrote:
>> Thanks Jagan,
>>
>> On 08/12/2015 05:01 AM, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>> Vikas,
>>>
>>> Did you verified on board, can you just verifie
t; Hi Vikas,
>>
>> (added Marek to Cc)
>>
>>
>> On 11.08.2015 23:19, vikasm wrote:
>>>
>>> On 07/23/2015 05:22 AM, Stefan Roese wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Vikas,
>>>>
>>>> On 16.07.2015 08:46, Stefan Roese wrote:
Hi Stefan,
On 07/23/2015 05:22 AM, Stefan Roese wrote:
> Hi Vikas,
>
> On 16.07.2015 08:46, Stefan Roese wrote:
> In addition can you please check the patch causing this instability on
> socfpga. I don't like to bug you but to close this patchset, this info
> & tests mentioned above s
Hi Stefan,
On 05/28/2015 11:20 PM, Stefan Roese wrote:
> Hi Vikas,
>
> (added Dinh, Graham and Marek to Cc)
>
> On 29.05.2015 03:22, Vikas Manocha wrote:
>> Trigger base address can be set to the spi flash address without any
>> masking, here is the explanation of the register.
>>
>> QSPI_IND_AHB_
Hello Masahiro,
On 05/01/2015 03:32 PM, vikasm wrote:
> Thanks Simon,
>
> On 05/01/2015 03:02 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> +Masahiro, for my of_match_ptr() comment below.
>>
>> Hi Vikas,
>>
>> On 1 May 2015 at 15:48, Vikas Manocha wrote:
>>> This pa
Thanks Simon,
On 05/02/2015 07:26 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Vikas,
>
> On 1 May 2015 at 18:07, Vikas Manocha wrote:
>> This patch adds device tree for the ST Micro stv0991 board & enables
>> device tree control. Progressively device tree support for the drivers
>> being used will also be added.
Hi Simon,
On 05/01/2015 04:45 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Vikas,
>
> On 1 May 2015 at 17:18, vikasm wrote:
>> Thanks Simon,
>>
>> On 05/01/2015 04:01 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi Vikas,
>>>
>>> On 1 May 2015 at 16:43, Vikas Manocha wro
Thanks Simon,
On 05/01/2015 03:02 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> +Masahiro, for my of_match_ptr() comment below.
>
> Hi Vikas,
>
> On 1 May 2015 at 15:48, Vikas Manocha wrote:
>> This patch adds device tree support for arm pl010/pl011 driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vikas Manocha
>> ---
>> doc/device-tr
Thanks Simon,
On 05/01/2015 04:01 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Vikas,
>
> On 1 May 2015 at 16:43, Vikas Manocha wrote:
>
>
There is not much to add in the commit message apart from info in the title,
that is why i didn't add any message in the body. Please let me know if i am
missing something
On 03/30/2015 08:48 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
> ---
>
> arch/arm/Kconfig | 2 ++
> configs/stv0991_defconfig | 2 --
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Acked-by : Vikas Manocha
___
U-Boot mai
On 12/18/2014 09:19 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> This commit fixes warnings reported by tools/genboardscfg.py.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
> Cc: Vikas Manocha
> ---
>
> board/st/stv0991/MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/board/st/stv0991/MAINTAINERS b/bo
Hi Simon,
On 11/25/2014 11:50 AM, vikasm wrote:
Hello Simon,
On 11/18/2014 10:17 AM, vikasm wrote:
Hello Simon,
On 11/17/2014 09:19 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Vikas,
On 18 November 2014 01:30, Vikas Manocha wrote:
This patchset add support for new arch stv0991.
Changes in v4:
- rebased
Hello Simon,
On 11/18/2014 10:17 AM, vikasm wrote:
Hello Simon,
On 11/17/2014 09:19 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Vikas,
On 18 November 2014 01:30, Vikas Manocha wrote:
This patchset add support for new arch stv0991.
Changes in v4:
- rebased to current master
- added maintainers info
Changes
Hello Simon,
On 11/24/2014 07:51 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Vikas,
On 24 November 2014 at 17:40, vikasm wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 11/24/2014 07:51 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Vikas,
On 18 November 2014 at 11:59, vikasm wrote:
Thanks Simon,
On 11/17/2014 09:30 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Vikas
Hi Simon,
On 11/24/2014 07:51 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Vikas,
On 18 November 2014 at 11:59, vikasm wrote:
Thanks Simon,
On 11/17/2014 09:30 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Vikas,
On 18 November 2014 00:17, Vikas Manocha wrote:
This patchset fixes the pl01x driver esp for pl011 baudrate
Thanks Simon,
On 11/17/2014 09:30 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Vikas,
On 18 November 2014 00:17, Vikas Manocha wrote:
This patchset fixes the pl01x driver esp for pl011 baudrate & line
control.
Vikas Manocha (5):
serial: pl01x: pass pl01x_type to set baudrate
serial: pl01x: fix pl011 baud
Hello Simon,
On 11/17/2014 09:19 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Vikas,
On 18 November 2014 01:30, Vikas Manocha wrote:
This patchset add support for new arch stv0991.
Changes in v4:
- rebased to current master
- added maintainers info
Changes in v3:
- removed period from commit messages
Changes
Hello Albert,
On 11/17/2014 11:29 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hello Vikas,
(nitpicking) can you replace '+' in the subject with 'and' ?
ok, i will submit the v5.
(nitpicking yet more) can you keep the "action" form for the subject
rather than "action done", i.e., "stv0991: enable default and
Thanks Albert,
On 11/17/2014 11:21 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hello Vikas,
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:30:25 -0800, Vikas Manocha
wrote:
stv0991 architecture support added. It contains the support for
following blocks
- Timer
- uart
Signed-off-by: Vikas Manocha
---
Changes in v4:
- added maintai
Hello Masahiro/Nobuhiro,
As per your comments , the changes are done in V3 patchset.
Please provide your acceptance for reviewed-by or acked-by tag ?
Rgds,
Vikas
On 09/02/2014 03:04 PM, Vikas MANOCHA wrote:
This patchset add support for new arch stv0991.
Changes in v3:
- removed period from c
Thanks Masahiro,
On 08/30/2014 11:25 PM, Masahiro YAMADA wrote:
Hi Vikas
stv0991 : Add basic stv0991 architecture support.
Please do not add a priod at the end of the commit subject
when you post patches next time.
I agree, i will remove the periods & submit v3.
Rgds,
Vikas
This is ment
Thanks Nobuhiro,
On 08/25/2014 06:47 PM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Hi,
2014-08-23 4:43 GMT+09:00 Vikas Manocha :
stv0991 architecture support added. It contains the support for
following blocks
- Timer
- uart
Signed-off-by: Vikas Manocha
---
arch/arm/Kconfig
28 matches
Mail list logo